“highly significant”

For the TbGK protein, there was no significant difference (p = 0.08) in RPP medians values between positive and negative sera ( Fig 3A and Table 3 ) compared to TcoCB1, TbWTL, and TcWTL, which showed highly significant differences (p<0.0001) between sera from infected and non-infected cattle groups ( Fig 3B ).

The least square (LS) mean differences compared with placebo in SPID6 values for the 62.5, 125, 250-mg, and combined DFN-15 groups were −756.6, −1120.7, −1355.1, and −1076.9, respectively, which were statistically highly significant for all comparisons ( P < 0.0001, ANCOVA model).

The correlation between anti-RBD and anti-Trimeric S IgG with NAb titers was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) at each time point, being spearman r slightly variable over time ( Table 1 ).

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that location was highly significant for all the traits ( p < 0.0001) except for plant height ( p < 0.001), leaf length (not significant), total seed weight ( p < 0.05), and yield ( p < 0.01) ( Table 5 ).

Both our cohort and that of Morris et al had a highly significant paired 2-tailed t test for Na + 1 ≠ Na + 2 ( P < 0.0001).

Levene’s test for homogeneity of variance from means is highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

The Analysis of Variance on memory performance on the three word categories across the two participant groups revealed a highly significant main effect of word category in both ISR ( F (2, 40) = 33.9, p < 0.0001) and DSR ( F (2, 34) = 48.4, p < 0.0001).

3b ; p = 0.0006) and the poor prognostic impact of the high signature score was reproduced in the EC cohort with full L1000 gene expression data ( n = 392) (Table 3 , all clinico-pathological variables highly significant; Fig. 3c , p < 0.0001).

The stratified log-rank test showed a highly significant difference between groups ( P < 0.0001), and the stratified Cox model produced a hazard ratio of 0.30 (95% CI 0.223–0.408), indicating a 70% lower risk of recurrence with the firsekibart group compared with the positive control.

Highly significant differences between pre- and post-weaning piglets were found ( P = 0.0001, P = 0.001 and P = 0.0001, for Envfit, Anosim and Adonis tests, respectively).

The adjusted result remained highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

Thus, there was a highly significant reduction ( p < 0.0001) in CFU compared with the negative control and with the enamel platelets treated with DMSO.

As seen in Figure 2 , this increase was highly significant in the whole-cell ( Figure 2 A p < 0.0001), the cytosol ( Figure 2 B p < 0.0001), and the nuclear volumes ( Figure 2 C p < 0.0001) when compared to the non-treated cardiomyocytes.

In addition, the difference between real synchrony and surrogate synchrony estimated by SUCO was highly significant ( t (44) = 43.80, p < 0.0001).

There was a highly significant media*volatile interaction ( p < 0.0001) for the raw responses reflective of compounds that not only differ in media solubility but also differences in response factors arising from electron impact mass spectrometry.

Effects of Bacterial Isolates on Sugar Beet Growth in Controlled Conditions The inoculation of the 18 bacterial isolates had a highly significant impact on sugar beet root length ( F = 23.653; p < 0.0001) and root dry weight ( F = 35.258; p < 0.0001).

The Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed a highly significant difference in OS was detected between the high- and low-risk groups (Log-rank test P < 0.0001), suggesting that the expression of these 5 genes can be effectively distinguished the high- and low-risk of these PC patients (Fig. 4 B and Fig. 5 ).

However, the past five-year trend (2015-2019) was different where, the daily average of PM 2.5 and PM 10 levels (2015-2019) were higher by 70 and 155% when compared with the same time period in 2020 (Phase I), which was highly significant (Kruskal-Wallis test, p <0.0001) (Fig.

We used automatic image analysis to count LMNA foci and found a highly significant difference between NTRK1-expressing and control cells ( p -value < 0.0001).

Correlation of these two cytokines regarding the whole study group (n = 48) was highly significant (p < 0.0001, Spearmans rank correlation) upon stimulation with Penicillium chrysogenum (r s = 0.82) and Aspergillus fumigatus (r s = 0.80) and after stimulation with 10 pg/mL endotoxin (r s = 0.55).

The most striking finding was the highly significant increase in IFN-γ levels in both groups, with a more pronounced effect in the Yoga group (from 7.65 ± 2.94 to 19.58 ± 2.72; P < 0.0001) compared to the Control group (from 8.49 ± 2.07 to 16.85 ± 3.29; P < 0.0001).

The difference in motility scores between the two groups was highly significant ( P = 0.0001).

The correlation was moderately strong (r = -0.6566) and highly significant (p < 0.0001).

Furthermore, the correlation between both methods was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), with Spearman’s r s = 0.9912 for honey, 0.9492 for hive debris, and 0.9682 for both sample types combined. 3.4.

The differences between the two populations were highly significant starting from D30 ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 5B ).