“highly significant”

However, purge loss in cured pork sausages was highly significant with the addition of ligands ( p < 0.0001; Table 2 ), with cysteine treatment showing higher purge loss than histidine and nicotinamide treatments ( p < 0.05; Table 3 ).

Although not entirely valid, given the informality of the study, it is nevertheless interesting to note that this difference was highly significant (Chi square p < 0.0001).

GWAS p -values and R 2 effects were extracted and QTL selection criteria was carried-out based on standard conditions of significance: “highly significant” refers to P < 0.0001 and “significant” refers to P < 0.001.

Satisfaction and Perceptions of Quality and Patient Safety Course and Implemented Activities A pre–post analysis of 51 students’ responses using the McNemar test revealed a highly significant positive change in their perceptions towards the quality and patient safety course ( p < 0.0001).

In addition, Ang-2 > 3.554 ng/mL and Ang-2/1 > 0.504 were associated with increased mortality, with highly significant differences observed ( P < .0001 for both) ( Figure 3C and E ).

This represents an almost five-times enrichment for the presence of the AAAUAA motif in this set of highly expressed transcripts for storage proteins (which is highly significant, with p < 0.0001, according to the one-sided Fisher’s exact test based on a 2 × 2 contingency table) with respect to transcripts not involved in the nutrient reservoir activity (represented by a random sample of 6258 protein-coding genes whose 3′ UTR sequence is identified in rice, which showed a presence of the motif in about 20% of the 3′ UTR sequence).

Variation by subregion for natural communities The factorial ANOVAs empirically demonstrate greater variation by subregion than by climate area ( Fig 2 ), and that a non-significant portion of variance in Ecosystem Status results from climate scenarios (P = 0.11, 0.01% of variation), compared to a highly significant result for subregions (P < 0.0001, 7.16% of variation).

The relative gray values between positive and negative samples exhibited a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001), and the ROC curves showed AUC values of 1 for each genotype ( Figure A–C).

Variance in signed FA (δ 2 FA =0.4066) was more than tenfold larger than variance in ME (δ 2 ME =0.03085) and was highly significant (likelihood-ratio test: P <0.0001).

2a , b ) and a highly significant decrease in IFN-γ + secreting Th cells ( p = 0.0001, Fig. 2c , d ), as compared to both control groups.

Based on the results, it showed that the model is highly significant when the computed F -value is greater than the tabulated F -value and the probability value is low ( p < 0.0001), indicating that the individual terms in each response model were significant on the interaction effect.

Furthermore, a highly significant ( P <0.0001) correlation between maximal efficacy and log potency of dexamethasone-mediated repression amongst genes was observed, thus confirming this observation ( Figure 2D , Table S3 ).

34 A highly significant association also was observed using this alternative measure ( P < .0001; Table V ; available at www.jpeds.com ).

The r value (0.72) is highly significant ( p < 0.0001; n = 468).

Notably, treatment of PNP-silenced cells with trastuzumab produced a pronounced and highly significant cytotoxic effect, reducing cell viability by ~45% compared to CTL ( p < 0.0001), and significantly more than either treatment alone.

3c ), highly significant effects in paired two-way t tests (weakest effect: p = 0.0001), indicating that our experimental conditions do give rise to the so-called stereo-movement suppression phenomenon.

Although a statistical comparison of these two subgroups was not included in the original paper, we performed this comparison using data provided in the manuscript, which was statistically highly significant (Fisher’s exact test; p = 0.0001).

There was a highly significant decrease in the mean value in the Aspartame Group ( p <0.0001) as compared with the Control Group, and there was a nonsignificant decrease ( p > 0.05) in the Recovery Group as compared with the Control Group. 4.

There was a highly significant concordance between the counts obtained by the HHAC and those by microscopy for mf densities of >5,000 (p<0.0001, r c = 0.97) or >30,000 per ml (p<0.0001, r c = 0.90).

For ANOVA analysis, the results revealed that the four models were highly significant (P < 0.0001).

The red line indicates the best linear fit for the two estimates with the resulting correlation being highly significant (R 2 = 0.8, p<0.0001).

The lack of a significant interaction between the stress and IMI treatment was observed in the anterodorsal part of the medial amygdaloid nucleus (MeAD) [interaction, F (2, 36) = 1.40; ns], while the treatment factor was highly significant [treatment factor, F (1, 36) = 24.20; p < 0.0001] and the impact of stress was also statistically significant [stress factor, F (2, 36) = 3.75; p < 0.05].

The model was found to be highly significant, as evidenced by the results of an F-test, which gave an F-value of 1655.45 ( p < 0.0001).

Using α=0.05 as the significance threshold, our analysis revealed a highly significant difference at F442 ( P < 0.0001) and a marginally significant difference at F447 ( P = 0.0468).

Statistical analysis (independent t -tests) confirmed that these differences were highly significant from day 13 onward ( p < 0.0001).