An r -value of 0.97 shows very strong correlation between CFB and GCB, which was statistically highly significant ( P < 0.0001).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
This was supported by statistical analysis that revealed that the frequency of polarization in HIV-1-infected T cells was highly significant compared to contacts formed between two uninfected T cells (odds ratio [OR] at 10 min, 1; OR at 20 min, 9; OR at 60 min, 17.9; Fisher's exact test, P < 0.0001) ( Fig. 1C ).
The model was highly significant (F = 117.22; p < 0.0001) and accounted for 82.4% of the variance in planned spending (R 2 = 0.824).
1 ), being the difference with the WT variability highly significant (Wilcoxon signed rank test V = 12246, P < 0.0001).
Exogenous application of aggregated SOD1 resulted in a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) increase (from 0.85 +/− 0.42 % to 4.7 +/− 0.62 %) in the proportion of cells containing inclusions (Fig. 1d ).
A highly significant correlation (p < 0.0001) was found between the results obtained for Teff flag leaf PSA using CoverageTool and ImageJ (Fig. 3 ) Another example for flag leaf blade PSA analysis by CoverageTool is presented [Fig. 7 and Table 3 in 11 ] as part of a drought experiment, which included a bread wheat cultivar and its near introgression line.
By week 1, the Col/Cs/A-PRF group showed a significant reduction in BMD (~ 650 HU) compared to the C group (~ 750 HU), with a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001).
Measurement error The ANOVAs for centroid size and shape both reveal that the “Individual” main effect is highly significant ( P < 0.0001), which means that the variation among flowers greatly exceeds the measurement error due to “Imaging” and “Digitising” ( Table 1 ).
Doxy-induction during differentiation led to a highly significant reduction of the relative amount of MAP2-positive neurons after 30 days in a dose-dependent manner (n = 3, Tukey's multiple comparisons test, p < 0.0001).
However, when the fertilization rates were adjusted for the mature oocytes (metaphase-II oocytes), there was a highly significant difference in fertilization rates in favour of the group with SDF levels < 15% where the women were in the younger age grouping of <35 years (78.4% vs. 73.0%; p < 0.0001).
The genetic differentiation among the populations was high (F ST : 0.28) and found to be highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
As expected, there was also a highly significant difference between thicknesses in different ETDRS subfields (p < 0.0001) and different layers (p < 0.0001).
Whereas phagocytosis in the presence of heat-inactivated serum from NHD showed no significant association with LPC concentrations (not shown), a highly significant negative correlation ( r = –0.556, p < 0.0001) between LPC levels and phagocytosis in case of heat-inactivated serum from patients with SLE was observed (Figure 5 B).
When allelic diversity in recombinant and nonrecombinant regions was compared in isolates from both species, the difference was still highly significant (unpaired t -test; t = 0.506 df = 1,476, P < 0.0001), as were the variances between all distributions (one-way ANOVA, P < 0.0001).
Marker-trait associations of early vigor in wheat landraces For the water deficit condition, 54 highly significant marker-trait associations (MTAs) were identified across all chromosomes with the FarmCPU method at a significance level of –log 10 P- value >4 ( Table 2 ).
The results indicated that drug release from all the screened formulations was very highly significant compared to that from drug suspension ( P < 0.0001), thus suggesting a higher bioavailability potential of the drug.
The overall comparison of groups showed a highly significant decrease in HATL5 expression in both Grade I-II (P<0.0001) and Grade III (P<0.0001) tumor samples as compared to normal and tumor adjacent samples ( Fig. 6A ).
Analysis of GMFI revealed parallel results, with highly significant MOI effects in MDA-MB-231 (F(2,6) = 427.7, p < 0.0001) and MDA-MB-468 (F(2,6) = 297.6, p < 0.0001), confirming robust dose-dependent increases in bacterial load, whereas MDA-MB-453 exhibited negligible changes.
Patients with ER-negative status (EFS: P = 0.043) had poorer outcomes and RT was associated with highly significant increase in LRRFS, EFS and OS (P < 0.0001, P < 0.001 and P = 0.017). status released display-pdf yes is-olf no is-manuscript no is-preprint no is-journal-matter no is-scanned no is-retracted no Received 2013 Dec 4; Accepted 2013 Dec 31; Collection date 2014.
Two-way ANOVA shows highly significant differences [F(1,24)=31.5, p<0.0001] between HAT genes expression in controls and embryos injected with well described Dystrophin morpholino cocktail (also see Materials and methods, S1 Fig A ).
The proportional reductions in recurrence with dose-intense chemotherapy were similar and highly significant (p<0·0001) in oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive and ER-negative disease and did not differ significantly by other patient or tumour characteristics.
Marble burying was strikingly increased by both treatments and two-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant effect of time (F = 49.16, df 1,47 p < 0.0001) and treatment (F = 12.67, df 2,47 p < 0.0001) and a significant time X treatment interaction (F = 12.67, df 2,47 p < 0.0001) (Fig. 6D ).
Differences between strains were highly significant by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (F(3, 8) = 299.2, p < 0.0001).
The two-way analysis of variance revealed a highly significant effect of the culture medium on mycelial growth F (1,44) = 90.128; p < 0.0001.
The regression model was highly significant with an F-value of 308.39 (p < 0.0001), while the lack-of-fit was not significant (p > 0.05), indicating that the model adequately described the experimental data.