“highly significant”

All of the phenotypic correlation coefficients were positive and highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

Regarding education attainment, there was a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001) in the highest degree obtained between PT and SP, detailed further in Table 1 .

We also found highly significant differences in CD8, CD4 and CD3 staining in tumors between TIL growers and non-growers (p<0.0001).

Highly significant AEI was observed at TMEM129 ( P < 0.0001; Fig. 6 A and Supplementary Table 8 ), with a mean T/C ratio of 0.84.

In these samples, we previously reported a highly significant positive correlation between the 71A1/3D6 oligomer values and both total tau ( r = 0.71, * p < 0.0001; Fig 3A ) and phospho‐tau 181 ( r = 0.70, * p < 0.0001; Pearson correlation coefficients; Fig 3B ) and no significant correlation with Aβ1‐42 monomer levels (Fig 3C ). 21 A separate cohort of control CSFs from 40 young (mid‐30s), healthy control individuals was also assayed, and their CSF 71A1 oAβ levels were compared with the patients from the BWH MAC cohort after further stratification.

A linear mixed-effects model, accounting for nesting within animals and tissue sections, confirmed a highly significant negative association between protein intensity and distance from the plaque core for both EFEMP1 (β = -0.53, p < 0.0001) and GALNT10 (β = -0.51, p < 0.0001) (Fig. 4 F-H).

Statistical analysis (unpaired t test) showed that the minor decrease observed in Young Women than in Young Men is highly significant ( P < .0001), and it is also significant the smaller decrease detected in adult women than adult men ( P = .0005).

Results: A significant improvement was noticed in the somatic, urogenital, and psychological climacteric symptoms from baseline to 6 weeks ( P = 0.001) and a highly significant improvement after 12 weeks ( P = 0.0001) of treatment. 96.5% of patients were satisfied with the treatment outcome evaluated by the MS-TSQ.

This difference was highly significant (p<0.0001).

Statistical comparison confirmed that differences between regions were highly significant (χ 2 = 348.0, p < 0.0001), highlighting pronounced regional heterogeneity of the epizootiological situation ( Table 2 ).

However, the ANOVA confirmed a highly significant difference between the groups for all three subdomains ( P < 0.0001 for each) and Cuzick's trend test showed a strong, and highly significant, trend towards lower scores with increasing mEHRA class ( P < 0.0001 for each of the three subdomains).

The test yielded a highly significant result ( p < 0.0001), confirming the presence of potential publication bias across the included studies ( Figure 7 ).

This downregulation was dose dependent with inhibitor KU757 and highly significant compared to controls ( P < .0001).

As the probability (p-) column indicates, all main effects—distracter level, formant swing extent, the size of f0 separation, and assignment of the higher f0 to target or distracter—were highly significant with p = 0.0001, both within and across subjects.

He found that there was a highly significant positive correlation between EPDS scores on the two occasions (Spearman rank correlation r=0.59, p<0.0001). 13 Although studies performed in the immediate postnatal period are likely to pick up many cases of postnatal blues, Dennis and McQueen 14 found that mothers with an EPDS score >12 at 1 week postnatal were significantly more likely at 4 and/or 8 weeks to discontinue breastfeeding, be unsatisfied with their infant-feeding method, experience significant breastfeeding problems and report lower levels of breastfeeding self-efficacy.

All these differences were highly significant at P < 0.0001.

The mean number of AMS on FSHtri was 1.96 and on FSHtetra 1.84, and the difference 0.1175 ± 0.0035 ( n = 78) was highly significant ( P < 0.0001) ( Figure 4 , left panel).

While subsets of the neuronal population showed increases or decreases in activity, the overall population showed a 26% increase in mean firing rate, which was highly significant with t -test p < 0.0001 ( Figure 4f ).

Both pre and post drug, the difference between the baseline and step firing rates in these 31 cells was highly significant ( Fig 3C pre and post drug Bonferroni P<0.0001).

Differences between normal and obese subjects for insulin, CRP, adiponectin and leptin were all highly significant (p<0.0001).

We tested the hypothesis of independence of these distributions and found it to be highly significant (t = −10.95, df = 642.86, p ≤ 0.0001).

This was a highly significant ( P < 0.0001) difference.

The r value (0.72) is highly significant ( p < 0.0001; n = 468).

ANOVA results ( Table 2 ) confirmed the quadratic model was highly significant ( F = 84.06, p < 0.0001).

Year-Effects on P and N in Green Leaves All variables showed highly significant differences among years ( P < 0.0001) and significant interactions of Year ×Age ( Table 1 ).