The difference in rates between officers and enlisted personnel was highly significant for hepatitis A, hepatitis B, and the aggregate of all forms of viral hepatitis (P < 0.0001) but was not significant for hepatitis, type unspecified (P = 0.099).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Substitution saturation is marginally significant for the SKL1 family (p = 0.07) and highly significant for the SK family (p<0.0001).
The correlation between Δ7 SMN baseline and Δ7 SMN at one year was less than flSMN, but still highly significant (p<0.0001).
The AFAS showed a highly significant decrease in explicit bias after the OASP (p<0.0001).
Analysis by R, fitting a GLM with a quasibinomial error structure, confirmed the highly significant main effects of age (change in deviance = 84.45, P < 0.0001, for 6 df) and region (change in deviance = 27.03, P < 0.0001, for 3 df), and the 2-way interaction between age and region (change in deviance = 34.85, P = 0.01, for 18 df, residual degrees of freedom = 1615).
K S and the block size show a strong negative correlation, and Pearson's correlation coefficient is r = −0.288, which is highly significant ( p <0.0001, permutation test).
There was the highly significant difference in means of SpO 2 in Group A ( P < 0.0001) at 3.5 min (SpO 2 of 96.9%) from baseline when the nose was covered by rubber dam given by post-hoc analysis.
We observed a highly significant correlation between the genetic distance and the variance (Pearson correlation coefficient: r = 0.773, n = 16, two-tailed p <0.0001), indicating that segregation increased in proportion to the genetic distance between strains.
The association of duration of use remained highly significant for moderate or greater AR ( p < 0.0001) but the association with moderate or greater MR did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.09, one-sided) while the trend for moderate or greater TR remained statistically significant ( p = 0.007, one-sided).
This interaction between potato type and combination status was highly significant ( p -value < 0.0001); mixing potatoes with MPACs leads to increased MPAC consumption when the potato type is the shaped potato face, but leads to decreased MPAC consumption when the potato type is diced potatoes.
parasuis field isolates, a highly significant protection was conferred by the vaccination in the survival rate ( p < 0.0001), regardless of G. parasuis TbpB cluster and SV, since all non-immunized piglets died within the initial three days post-infection (dpi) (Table 2 ).
Statistical analysis demonstrated highly significant differences among the three ED severity groups for both IIEF-5 scores (p < 0.0001) and serum testosterone levels (p < 0.0001).
The differences where highly significant in the Wilcoxon test (z = -3,79; p < 0,0001).
As the tumor sets were very large, statistical differences between the ERG positive and negative groups were still highly significant ( p < 0.0001; Figure 2 ).
Risk Group As shown in Table 3 , the main effect of risk group was highly significant [ F = 20.83; p < 0.0001], showing that HR subjects [2.96 (0.01)] manifested significantly lower theta power than their LR counterparts [3.10 (0.03)].
The CXCL12-induced increases in cell number observed after 7 days were therefore always highly significant ( P <0.0001).
One-year survival for good, moderate, and poor risk groups were 48.5, 25.7, and 11%, respectively, with a highly significant difference among the three groups ( P <0.0001).
Both differences were highly significant (p < .0001) [61].
Each Spearman correlation was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), except for the relationships of sleep with pain ( p = 0.0008), with general activity ( p = 0.0004), with walking ability ( p = 0.0068), and with relations with others ( p = 0.0029).
pseudoplatanus was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
Superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase and catalase activities were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) in the treatment groups compared to the control.
A Pearson's chi-square test comparing arsenic associated diseases (derived from 424 arsenic-interacting genes) indicated that these associations were highly significant (p-value < 0.0001).
The chi‐square test result indicates a highly significant association between this perception and the participants’ responses ( χ 2 = 32.202, p = 0.0001), as shown in Table 2 .
There was a highly significant effect of group on the accuracy difference (M - W), as indicated by ANOVA (F (2, 138) = 48.96, p < 0.0001).
The degree of shift to higher persistence of the multistate clusters compared to single-state appears roughly similar for all four pathogens and is highly significant (all P -values < 10 −4 , Mann–Whitney U test).