Although all four correlations were highly significant ( P <0.0001), by using g s the regression coefficients became higher, in agreement with previous surveys suggesting g s as a reference parameter ( Medrano et al. , 2002 ; Flexas et al. , 2004 ).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
The difference in TsH values between both groups was highly significant ( P < .0001) as well as between group A and control group ( P < .001; according to the all pairwise multiple comparison procedures-Holm-Sidak method).
3 D , compare lanes 3 and 5; differences were highly significant: P<0.0001).
Results Data on all decided agonistic interactions produced a highly significant linear dominance hierarchy (h' = 0.97, p = 0.0001; 10,000 matrix permutations).
Highly significant correlations (r > 0.97, p < 0.0001) between upregulated gene–metabolite pairs are shown in Figure 6 B, and downregulated pairs are shown in Figure 6 C.
As a result, the difference in mortality remained highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
Across the 2 h testing period there was a highly significant genotype by time bin effect ( F = 5.88; p<0.0001 ; Fig. 3D ).
Most strikingly, we detected a highly significant positive relationship between thigh and pectoralis mitochondrial content (correlation coefficient 0.61; P <0.0001).
pH had a highly significant impact on rubbing resistance, according to a one-way ANOVA (F (5,12) = 24.6, p < 0.0001).
Approximately 33.3% of all MC17 isolates were resistant to 5FC and this was found to be highly significant ( p <0.0001, Chi-square; p = 0.0005, Fisher exact test) when compared to the presence of 3.9 and 9.5% of resistant isolates in MC8 and MC3, respectively.
Decrease in Circulating mDCPs and pDCPs in PAD In patients with PAD, a highly significant decrease in the relative numbers of circulating mDCPs (0.15 versus 0.2; P < 0.0001), pDCPs (0.09 versus 0.12; P = 0.01), and tDCPs (0.25 versus 0.36; P < 0.0001) was observed compared to the controls ( Figure 2 ).
Intervention Outcomes and Group Comparison Overall, the results of our intervention are highly significant (as shown in Table 2 and Table 3 ) with a p -value of <0.0001 for all parameters across both groups.
When the data from all five experiments are pooled, this reduction is very highly significant ( P <0.0001).
The four distance interims also demonstrated a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001) when compared to one another.
Furthermore, the highly significant inverse correlation between expression of Glut-1 (implying local hypoxia) and the presence of micro vessels suggests that hypoxia is a major driver (p<0.0001; Figure 1A ).
The fecundity of laboratory reared females showed a highly significant positive relationship with female body mass before egg laying (linear regression, y = −6.484+2363.95 x , F 1,13 = 86.9, R 2 = 0.82, P<0.0001).
In a multilevel model describing HbA1c as dependent variable, the predictor time was highly significant at all time points (p < 0.0001), using time as categorical variable (drop of HbA1c at: Visit 4 = -2.3308, Visit 3 = -2.3583, Visit 2 = -2.0816, Visit 1 = -1.2916) or as continuous variable (drop of HbA1c per time unit = -0.5964).
In the present study, MDA levels were much higher in individuals with PCOS (0.71±0.13) than in those without PCOS (0.41±0.14) and the data was highly significant (p=0.0001).
The bacterial load difference mentioned above was highly significant (**** p < 0.0001) in all these groups.
In a multivariable analysis the interaction with time to treatment remained highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
This model was highly significant (p<10 −4 ) and explained 7.5% of the variation in African ancestry levels between individuals (adjusted R 2 ).
A highly significant difference in the journal impact factor ( p < 0.0001) was observed between manuscripts associated with OC (8.3 ± 10.1) and PP (4.0 ± 2.3).
The Gompertz curve fitted to the entire data set was highly significant ( F = 5127.5, P > 0.0001, df = 2, 107) and accounted for 99% of the total variation in the data ( Table 2 ).
The difference in bacterial burden in the lungs between these two groups was highly significant ( P <0.0001, one-way ANOVA with Tukey's correction).
The correlation coefficient ( r 2) values range from 0.70 to 0.95 (0.70 [for professors], 0.89 [for assistant professors], and 0.95 [for associate professors]); F values are highly significant ( P < .0001) for all faculty subgroups.