“highly significant”

Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05 for significant differences and p < 0.01 for highly significant differences, with **** indicating p < 0.0001, *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, and * p < 0.05. 3.

We found a highly significant correlation between the extent of intermingling and translocation frequency ( p < 0.0001; Figure 2 B), such that higher levels of CT intermingling increase the chances of double-strand breaks (DSBs) being involved in rearrangements with other chromosomes.

subquinaria revealed a highly significant effect of population type (sympatric versus allopatric; Wald χ 2 = 17.88, p < 0.0001), but no effect of individual population within population type (χ 2 = 1.02, p = 0.91) or trial (χ 2 = 2.12, p = 0.35).

This difference was highly significant (p < 0.0001).

Mc Neman concordance between tests P < 0.0001 and Kappa index gives us a highly significant concordance P < 0.0001.

The apparent 10.2/7.6 mmHg difference between inpatients and outpatients was only slightly reduced to 8.0/5.1 mmHg after adjustment for baseline and remained highly significant (p < 0.0001/p < 0.0001) even after correction for cluster effects.

The difference of distribution was considered highly significant ( p < 0.0001) ( Table 1 ).

The correlations between AS3-team members were in all cases highly significant ( P < 0.0001; even higher than those of the AS2-team, Table 4 ), suggesting that all assessors produced on average criterion scores resulting in roughly the same rank order of species (range of correlations 0.361–0.939, N = 90) and criteria (range of correlations 0.419–0.971, N = 24).

Comparison of distance errors The comparison of the distance reproduction error shows a main effect of distance [ F (9,38) = 136.2, p < 0.0001] together with a highly significant interaction of condition and distance [ F (18,342) = 3.45, p < 0.0001].

This regression was highly significant (slope = 0.5002, intercept = −0.8805, R 2 = 0.5580, F statistic = 60.59, p < 0.0001; Figure 5F ).

There is consistently more D1 dimensions in Group II as compared to Group I in each of interdental sites and these differences were found to be statistically significant for PM/CA, CA/LI and LI/CI while the difference was highly significant with CI/CI, CI/LI, LI/CA and CA/PM (p < 0.0001). 5 Discussion In search of definitive guidelines for attaining esthetics in relation to the proportionate existence of white and pink components, several clinical trials have been reported in the literature pertaining to PCA locations ( de Castro et al., 2006 , Sarver, 2004 ).

The correlation between vascularization and the Breslow thickness was highly significant ( p <0.0001).

While pairing at this locus was abolished throughout the gonad in the hal-2 single mutant, the syp-3; hal-2 double mutant exhibited a highly significant increase in pairing over the hal-2 single mutant specifically in Zone 2 (p<0.0001), the same zone in which chromosome V PCs were shown to be active in the hal-2; syp-2 double mutant.

The difference in freeze-thaw mortality rates between ancestral and evolved rates is highly significant (two-tailed t-test with unequal variances, p < 0.0001).

The 4w-11 line was characterized by three highly significant I-kappaB/NF-kappaB pathway-related functions (p < 0.0001) (Table 10 ).

There are 502 genes in common between the two sets (5,178 from 28 earlier studies and the 1,201 reported here); this degree of overlap is highly significant ( p < 0.0001), yet indicates that our approach yielded a large number of genes (699) ( Table S7 ) not previously known to be UV responsive.

The correlation for Tajima's D values across all genes between the two strata is highly significant (Spearman's ρ = 0.62, P<0.0001).

Highly significant correlations generally exist between the various markers (p<0.0001), with a slightly lesser significance between MLANA and MITF (p = 0.005), with the exception being between MLANA and TYR markers, where no statistical significance was found (p = 0.11).

The results are statistically highly significant WOMAC osteoarthritis index at V1: (4.24 ± 1.94/6.19 ± 1.79; p < 0.0001, t test and Wilcoxon test), not significant at V2: p = 0.1636, highly significant at V3: p = 0.0009, and significant at V4: p = 0.0123 (Fig. 4 ).

We found highly significant positive correlations between the identity levels of allergens and the representative helminth (r = 0.70, P<0.0001), protozoan (r = 0.64, P<0.0001) and fungal (r = 0.47, P = 0.0011) organisms suggesting that a conserved protein allergen in HPF is also conserved to a similar level in human.

LACE score was highly significant as a predictor of readmission (p<0.0001), with an AUC of 0.773 (95% CI 0.768 to 0.779) and R 2 of 0.180.

All cortical brain regions showed highly significant correlations irrespective of the early-phase FBB time frame or the particular reference region (p < 0.0001).

All the correlations presented here are highly significant ( p < 0.0001) except when stated.

A one-way ANOVA confirmed a highly significant effect of condition on accuracy differences (F (2, 132) = 477.06, p < 0.0001).

The difference between these values is highly significant ( P < 0.0001).