Removal of the two outliers improved the amount of variance explained by the model (76%) and turned into a highly significant relationship (r 2 adj = 0.76, F 1,14 = 49.27, P < 0.0001).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
This rate was highly significant (p < 0.0001) when compared to 1.4% in the control group which comprised of age and sex matched HIV-negative healthy persons.
There was a significant heterogeneity among studies I 2 = 88.7% (95% CI: 76.3–94.6%), τ 2 = 17.32, and a highly significant Q -test ( p < 0.0001) ( 14 , 17–20 ).
The pattern of trait correlations among pigeons is highly significant when adjusted for repeatability ( r m >1 between rock dove and domestic (p<0.0001); r m =0.798 for the feral-domestic comparison (p<0.0001)) ( Supplementary Tab. 3 ).
Binary logistic regression analysis with ln-NLR as independent and case/control status as dependent variable with adjustment for sex, age and smoking, showed highly significant effect of ln-NLR ( p < 0.0001) with an odds-ratio (OR) of 3.64 (95% CI: 2.87–4.60) per unit increase of ln-NLR, which corresponds to an OR of 2.68 for each doubling of NLR.
The differences between groups A and B in the accumulated survival (Kaplan-Meier) were highly significant (log rank P value < 0.0001).
The Kaplan–Meier curve, however, does show a highly significant trend of loss-of-barrier function at higher concentration ( P < 0.0001 for both curve difference and trend significance, derived from log-rank tests) (Fig. 4i ).
These differences were highly significant ( p < 0.0001), suggesting greater susceptibility to hypercoagulability in males. 3.4.
(I,M) Show OS and PFS curves stratified by WHO grade in the PSM cohort, both showing highly significant differences (p < 0.0001 for OS and PFS).
Spearman’s correlation analysis showed a highly significant positive correlation between the number of A. pegreffii larvae and the fish body parameters ( Table 2 , p < 0.0001).
theobaldi and ostracod numbers were highly significant in the wet season (Pillai's F 8, 88 = 3.959, P < 0.0001).
The PR-A / PR-B ratio was significantly increased after 6 h in vitro culture ( p = 0.0487) and highly significant beyond 24 h culture ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 1(d) ). 3.2.
The overall CIA score difference was also calculated as a cumulative effect on the experiment termination day (day 51), which showed highly significant improvement ( p < 0.0001****) in both the peptide 10 mg/kg group and the 5 mg/kg group.
The effect is highly significant ( p < 0.0001), and its 95% confidence interval ranges from 0.683 to 0.775.
These differences in frequency are highly significant ( p < 0.0001 by the Fisher’s exact test).
We mapped ∼54 million sequencing tags to the reference human genome (alignment details are presented in Supplementary Table S9 ) resulting in a highly significant correlation (Spearman correlation = 0.77, P < 0.0001) between the RPKM values and the microarray generated expression values ( Figure 6 C).
Both were highly significant, priming SOA: F (1, 19) = 31.1, p < .0001, MSE = 129.9, task: F (2, 19) = 8.3, p < .001, MSE = 72.13.
As illustrated in Figure 6 , the resulting cross-coupled correlations were highly significant regressions, with the most significant occurring between the roll and pitch BCIs (R = 0.83, p < 0.0001). 4.
( 1995 ), where the correlation between sCA and dCA was highly significant ( r = 0.93, P < 0.0001).
For both survival traits, there was a highly significant line and sex term in the ANOVA ( P <0.0001), as well as a significant line by sex interaction ( P <0.0001).
For the green colonies, wood species, time, and wood amount were highly significant (P < 0.0001), as were their interactions.
The decline with age was highly significant ( p < 0.0001 in lme).
The antibody increase was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), with a 28-fold GMC increase (95% CI: 17–43-fold) ( Figure 2 B).
Quantitative IgG levels showed a highly significant inverse correlation with viral loads (p<0.0001) ( Figure ).
There was a highly significant effect of reversibility ( F (1,23) = 14.43, P < 0.0001), indicating that subjects were slower to respond to the reversible pictures involving 2 people than to the irreversible pictures involving 1 person and an object, regardless of the grammatical structure of the sentence.