“highly significant”

This quantitative analysis revealed highly significant overall differences between groups and sample areas (Group: F (1,40) = 38.89; p < 0.0001; Area: F (3,40) = 7.9; p = 0.0003; Interaction: F (3,40) = 3.2; p = 0.0332).

The results in Figure 8 show a highly significant correlation between the potency of both compounds in the cancer cell lines, with an R -value of 0.852 ( p < 0.0001 ).

The ANOVA results for the set (i) showed highly significant and statistically greater Ks in the set of 26 mitogenomes: Ks = 1.618 ± 0.019, Ka = 0.384 ± 0.019 ( n = 325), F = 1949.2, d.f. = 1; 648, p < 0.0001 (effective hypothesis decomposition).

At both RNA concentrations assayed, pDC-enriched PBMCs induced 10 to 19-fold higher levels of IFN-α upon transfection, with statistically highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001) in all cases; in the case of the S transcript, those levels were 1.5 higher when the dose was increased from 5 to 20 μg/mL.

Results All the parameters considered in our study showed highly significant difference in pre-treatment and post-functional values, suggesting their reliability ( p < 0.0001).

Two-way ANOVA Sidak’s multiple comparisons test was used to compare the mean of three values obtained from three independent conditions, using GraphPad Prism version 7 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, California, U.S.); * p < 0.05 indicates a significant result; ** p < 0.01 a very significant result, *** p < 0.001 a highly significant result; and **** p < 0.0001 an extremely significant result. 3.

The mean of c-KIT expression values (c-KIT/B2M ratio) was calculated for both benign (1.72) and malignant (0.138) groups and the difference resulted highly significant (p < 0.0001).

Results The difference between ages of the two groups was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

When treated with EAE-AS, the comparison of Caspase 3 expression between neurospheres and N2a is highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

Highly significant (p < 0.0001) negative Pearson correlations were found between HbO and alpha (r 2 = −0.69) and HbO and beta (r 2 = −0.54) rhythms.

Parity ( p -value < 0.0001), menopausal status ( p -value = 0.0001), BMI ( p < 0.0001), and education ( p -value = 0.001) showed the most evident differences (Table 2 ). We found a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) lower vegetable intake among cases (mean 85.24 g/day, SD 50.62) with respect to controls (mean 112.24 g/day, SD 74.49) and a less pronounced, lower fruit intake (mean 262.87 g/day, SD 140.98 vs mean 289.35 g/day, SD 146.28), while no association was found with alcohol intake or total energy intake (Table 2 ).

( 5 ) Highly significant correlations were found between RT-PCR results and antigen levels (Pearson r = −0.61; p < 0.0001) ( Fig. 1 B ).

The study successfully captured significant longitudinal trends in both humoral and cellular immunity, including a highly significant decline in anti-spike IgG antibodies ( P <0.0001) and group-wise differences in IFN-γ levels ( P =0.0299), indicating the robustness of the cohort size and design.

The regression equation obtained from these data was Ln y = −10.507 + 2.116x and was highly significant ( p << 0.0001, r 2 = 0.90, n = 96).

Although storage duration alone had no significant main effect, the effect of time was highly significant at both time points ( P < .0001), reflecting distinct recovery and clearance profiles over time ( Figure 5 E-F; supplemental Table 3 ).

Statistical analysis (unpaired t test) showed that the minor decrease observed in Young Women than in Young Men is highly significant ( P < .0001), and it is also significant the smaller decrease detected in adult women than adult men ( P = .0005).

Results A highly significant relationship was found between SVA and C7_PSI, mediolateral amplitude of CoP displacements and age (adjusted R2=0.69, p < 0.0001).

By metaphase, statistically highly significant EBV-IS ( p < 0.0001) were located on 13q21 (33 metaphases); 19q13 and 22q12 (16 metaphases); 1p35, 2p23, 2q31, 7p22, and 13p11 (15 metaphases); 3q26 and 7q21 (13 metaphases); 2q21, 4q21, and 4q34 (12 metaphases); 15q14, and 17q25 (11 metaphases); as well as 1q31 and 12q21 (eight metaphases).

This downregulation was dose dependent with inhibitor KU757 and highly significant compared to controls ( P < .0001).

The line differences in both traits were highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

The effect of ever having been diagnosed with a mental health condition was highly significant as a main effect (p<0.0001) but did not differ significantly by ethnicity or age.

Thus, the Multivariate Linear Equation (MLE) of LFI as a function of the experimental conditions of S, pH and TA/S, yields a highly significant fit (p << 0.0001) as seen in the comparison between the measured LFI and the calculated LFI (Fig. 2 ).

On the single-cell secretion levels ( Figure 2A , 2 nd panel), the secretion rate distributions showed a highly significant difference for 1-, 12- and 24-hours of stimulation (p < 0.0001 for all) and resolved to a slight difference for the 36-hour stimulation (p = 0.04).

For the inflammaging score (z), both main effects were highly significant: periodontal status (F = 175.67, p < 0.0001) and BMD status (F = 131.80, p < 0.0001) ( Table 5 ).

Pairwise analysis of the LysoTracker levels for the 24 patient cell lines included in both studies showed a highly significant correlation with previous measurements (Spearman r = 0.76, p < 0.0001, Fig. 1 ), demonstrating the reproducibility of LysoTracker staining in cultured primary fibroblasts from individuals with NPC1.