“highly significant”

Seventy-four samples were run in parallel using both methods, and there was a highly significant correlation between the two measurements (r = 0.97, p <0.0001).

First dose of analgesia was given at 22.7 ± 1.3 h and 6.066 ± 1.26 h in Group C + L and Group L, respectively, which was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

The fat-graft group also showed highly significant differences when compared with the groups submitted to the sternocleidomastoid muscle flap ( p = 0.0001) and the platelet-rich fibrin gel techniques ( p = 0.016).

The effect of mCPP was highly significant ( F 2.24 =29.0, P = 0.0001), but there was no interaction of drug and genotype.

Mc Neman concordance between tests P < 0.0001 and Kappa index gives us a highly significant concordance P < 0.0001.

Overall, this model was robust, with epigenetic age demonstrating a highly significant ( p < 0.0001, R 2 = 0.78) positive correlation with chronological age (Fig. 1a ).

Finally, highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001) were also detected between sham-lesioned vs.

Biological control of Sclerotium rolfsii causal agent of rot in pumpkin fruit in vitro For the three samples of the pathogen growth colonies, the mean values showed highly significant differences ( P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0042).

34 A highly significant association also was observed using this alternative measure ( P < .0001; Table V ; available at www.jpeds.com ).

The breadth of the responses to the 11 epitopes showed highly significant correlations with both lower pVLs ( P < 1 × 10 −4 ; r = −0.4909) and higher CD4 counts ( P < 1 × 10 −4 ; r = 0.4542) in these Japanese individuals ( Fig. 8B ).

The difference between the number of bacteria recovered from the wild type and the mutant strains was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

Results In terms of detection, participants successfully detected 95±6% (average±STD) of the Duck-under obstacles in the test trials while using the EyeCane, in a highly significant manner over the control while using the white-cane alone 13±30% ( p < 0.0001) (see Fig. 3A ).

Indeed, there was a highly significant correlation between MMSE scores and educational level (r=0.601, p<0.0001; data nor shown).

In contrast to the weight of the primary tumour, the mean value of the number of lung metastases was 481±98 in wild-type scid mice and 75±37 in E- and P-selectin-deficient scid mice, with the differences between the two groups being highly significant ( P <0.0001; see Figure 2) .

Results A highly significant association (p < 0.0001) was observed for joint space narrowing (JSN) as well as for osteophyte formation between the three groups.

The statistical analysis indicated a highly significant result (P < 0.0001), reinforcing the reliability and consistency of our experimental validation.

As a cross-check, calculated (via DIC and TA) and directly measured pH values were compared and showed a highly significant correlation and no outliers (pH (total scale) = 0.9176 pH (NBS) +0.5453; r 2 = 0.99; p<0.0001).

Immunohistochemistry showed that NAC1 and FASN immunointensities in ovarian serous carcinoma tissues had a highly significant correlation ( P < .0001).

Blood elevation of GST-π, DJ-1, NT-proBNP, NDKA and IL6 in stroke patients were highly significant ( p<.0001 ).

Moreover, by taking into account the normal and intestinal metaplasia tissue to examine TF expression along the gastric MACS, the increasing trend was shown to be highly significant in both approaches; P <0.0001 by JTOM for both I s and I m scales ( Figure 2 ).

Highly significant differences were observed in the detection rates for viral infection by year ( P < 0.0001) (Table 1 ).

Two-way repeated measures ANOVA revealed a highly significant effect of DHβE (F 1,9 = 122.21, P <0.0001) and no significant interaction between sex and the effects of DHβE on nicotinic currents.

The difference between the ability of the ZIKV-RT-PCR-positive and flavivirus groups (median ODr of 2.2 and 1.1, respectively) or ZIK-IgM-positive and flavivirus groups (median ODr of 3.6 and 1.1, respectively) to recognize ZEDIII was highly significant (Mean rank diff. = 103.3, p < 0.0001, Mean rank diff. = 123.2, p < 0.0001, respectively), whereas there was no statistical difference between the flavivirus and negative sera (median ODr of 1.1 and 1.2; respectively, Mean rank diff. = -13.75, p > 0.9999) or the ZIKV-RT-PCR-positive and ZIKV-IgM-positive sera (median ODr of 2.2 [1.7; 4.0] and 3.6 [2.0; 8.5]; respectively, Mean rank diff. = -19.82, p > 0.9999).

The inverse relationship between the axons’ regeneration probabilities and the sizes of their cell bodies was highly significant (r = 0.92, p < 0.0001; Figure 1 C). 3.2.

A highly significant increase in area under the ROC curve from ∼0.944 to >0.97 (p<0.0001) was noted upon addition of the ‘new’ tests and thereby established their positive impact on TBM diagnosis ( Figure 4 ).