“highly significant”

Specifically, the common effect model yielded a MD of 2.0580, with a 95% CI of [1.6161; 2.4998], and a highly significant p-value of < 0.0001.

All group differences were highly significant (p<0.0001).

The observed uneven geographic distribution of both A.1 and A.4 is statistically highly significant ( P < .0001, two-tailed Fisher’s exact test).This distribution of subtypes in single larvae is also well represented in the pooled samples LdMNPV-SB, -SU, and -SZ, where for the northern samples -SB and -SZ also A.1, B.1, and C.1 was predicted, whereas -SU was explained by a combination of B.2 and B.3.

ANOVA results revealed that dielectric type was the most dominant factor, contributing 33.0% to MRR variation with a highly significant F-value of 24.63 ( p < 0.0001).

The comparison between groups gave highly significant differences (ANOVA P < 0.0001****).

The rGS14-QuadMut-immunized group showed significant increases in IL-2 levels on days 7 and 14, with a highly significant difference compared to the control group ( p < 0.0001) and a significant difference compared to the rGS14-TrypMut group ( p < 0.001 or p < 0.05).

These observations were quantitatively corroborated by fluorescence intensity analysis, which revealed a more than 3-fold increase in the FAM channel signal in chemoresistant U251 MG/TMZ cells compared to that in U251 cells, with highly significant statistical differences ( P < 0.0001, Fig. 5E ).

A highly significant difference in MxA levels was detected across groups ( H = 33.37, P < 0.0001).

There was a highly significant positive correlation between glucose and glycogen (Spearman r = -0.4102, p<0.0001, S1A Fig ), and a negative correlation between pH and glycogen (Spearman r = -0.5418, p<0.0001, S1B Fig ).

A correlation analysis was carried out between AM and total body length (cm) ( n = 43), revealing a highly significant relationship (S = 5101.8, p = 0.0001; Figure 3 a).

The difference in methylation was highly significant (p < 0.0001).

This deviation from both the overall attendance rate and the attendance rate for those who modified their first appointment were highly significant (p < 1e‐4 for both).

The highly significant difference between these two values (Z=49.36, p<0.0001) indicates that co-innervations are not random, and suggests the existence of cooperative or joint-causality mechanisms for the innervation and control of nearby chromatophores.

Specifically, the Na, Tb, Alb, age, and Cr showed highly significant associations with survival (p < 0.0001 for Na, p = 0.0055 for Tb, p = 0.00016 for Alb, p < 0.0001 for age, and p = 0.036 for Cr).

The much wider spread observed in ∆2 compared to ∆1 indicates a greater similarity between results obtained by LD-PCR and pyrosequencing than between LD-PCR and NGS on the MiSeq platform, which is highly significant according to a folded F Test ( p = 0.0001).

Pairwise estimates of population differentiation were all high and highly significant ( Table 5 , P = 0.0001).

When comparing the SEDC group to all other phenotypes combined, the difference in the frequency of multiple ossification centers was highly significant (Fisher’s exact test, p < 0.0001).

Results showed the most effective binary combinations against MRSA, excluding β 14 (SGEO-TET) and β 34 (SMEO-TET), while the ternary combination of VOEO, SMEO, and TET ( β 234 ) had a highly significant effect on SACI-1 ( p = 0.0001).

Growth Performance ANOVA analysis revealed a highly significant effect of treatment on average daily gain ( Figure 1 ; p < 0.0001).

The ANOVA results ( Table 3 ) indicated that this quadratic regression model was highly significant (p < 0.0001) [ 59 ].

The differences among groups were highly significant at each time point ( p < 0.0001).

Marker-trait associations of early vigor in wheat landraces For the water deficit condition, 54 highly significant marker-trait associations (MTAs) were identified across all chromosomes with the FarmCPU method at a significance level of –log 10 P- value >4 ( Table 2 ).

However, based on tumor grade, the decrease in HADHA transcript level is not significant (ns, p = 0.999) between normal and grade 1 tumors but it is highly significant between normal and grade 2 ( p < 0.0001) and 3 ( p < 0.001) tumors. 3.2.

Mettl5 and Mettl3 exhibited a similar expression pattern, peaking on Day 1 with highly significant upregulation ( p < 0.0001).

In addition, these remained highly significant after exclusion of outliers ( r = −0.525, p < 0.0001 and r = −0.507, p < 0.0001, respectively; Figure 2 b).