“highly significant”

A p value < 0.05 was considered significant, a p value < 0.01 was considered highly significant, and a p value < 0.0001 was considered extremely significant.

Additionally, the Q-statistic was highly significant [Q(6) = 587.82, p < 0.0001], further confirming that the observed variation is unlikely to be due to chance alone.

There were highly significant associa- tions between MIB 1 score and histological type (X2 = 22.62, P < 0.0001) as well as histological grade (X2 = 22.21, P < 0.0001).

There was no association between the consistency of weight tracking and the prevalence of excessive GWG in low income women (p = 0.47), and there is a highly significant association in not-low income women (p ≤ 0.0001).

Statistical analysis revealed a highly significant association between diffuse p53 protein expression and p53 missense mutation in these tumours (Table 6; Chi-squared, P < 0.0001).

Indeed the difference between RCR and RRC was highly significant for remembered items (F(1,795.6) = 15.3, p<10 −4 ), but was not significant for forgotten items (F(1,1325.4) = 1.68, p = 0.195).

The pattern of [9 0 0] is highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

However, we noted a 20-fold increase in the frequency of H2AX −/− bouquet-stage nuclei ( H2AX −/− , 6%; wild-type, 0.4%; based on 2,567 mutant and 2,772 wild-type spermatogenic nuclei), with the differences being highly significant (P < 0.0001; χ 2 and Fisher test; Fig. 2 B).

The predicted model developed for catechin (Y 1 ) was as follows: Analysis of variance for predicted models implied that the model was highly significant (F-value 20.13, P < 0.0001) with a good coefficient of determination (R 2 = 0.98).

The correlations between these measures are highly significant (Pearson p < 0.0001).

Injection of the super-repressor IκB-α expression plasmid into E18 trigeminal neurons caused a highly significant reduction in the number of neurons surviving with CNTF, compared with neurons injected with an empty expression plasmid ( P < 0.0001, t test; Fig. 2 ).

For Alveofact ® and Curosurf ® , a highly significant influence of hrDMBT1 on the surface tension could be shown (P < 0.0001 or P = 0.0001, respectively).

The interspecific comparison revealed highly significant differences in both male and female body weights (see Fig. 2 ) and in M m /M f ratios ( ANOVA , F (9,50) = 8.21, P < 0.0001 ).

C2), S nn became very high (S nn = 0.87) and remained highly significant (P < 0.0001), demonstrating the high phylogeographic signal detected in the species across its distribution.

We found a highly significant correlation between age and HNK-1 antigen expression (r = 0.78, P < 0.0001).

There was a highly significant statistical interaction between age and residence after adjusting for time from initial diagnosis of CDI to the second episode ( P < 0.0001) ( Table 3 ).

Additionally, acarbose significantly reversed IGT to NGT; an effect that was highly significant when compared to the placebo group (p<0.0001).

The ANOVA [ Table 3 ] showed that this regression model was highly significant ( P < 0.0001) with F value of 13.65.

Participants who rated their familiarity as “Poor” were significantly more likely to be classified as engaging in “Poor Practice” concerning off-label drug use, as indicated by a highly significant residual ( P < .0001).

There was a highly significant interaction between population and temperature 2 ( F 3,2126 = 15.34, P < 0.0001) indicating that the pattern of ticks questing with temperature varied between populations.

A cutoff of 8.8 for max SUVmax advocated in our previous report was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

Cosmetic camouflage was found to reduce DQLI (dermatology quality of life index) (DLQI consists of 10 questions concerning patients’ perception of the impact of skin diseases each scored between 0–4 giving a range of 0–40) from 16.67 ± 3.87 and to 2.23 ± 1.16 after its use, the difference (14.67 ± 3.87) was found to be statistically highly significant (p < 0.0001) [ 24 ].

OS-related mortality showed a highly significant association with progressive disease during therapy ( p < 0.0001) and relapse off therapy ( p = 0.009).

Furthermore, the difference between EL4–B7-1 and EL4–B7-2 or EL4–B7-1+ B7-2 in the incidence of tumor rejection and tumor volume was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

1. There is a highly significant difference between the stimulation induced by DR3 DPw3* PBLs and PBLs expressing only one or none of these antigens (P < 0.0001).