“highly significant”

There were highly significant correlations between IHC and target prints (ER: r s =0.47, P <0.0001, PgR: r s =0.72, P <0.0001, Her2: r s =0.29, P =0.0135).

All three factors had highly significant effects ( p < 0.0001), and signal intensity levels were compared between the species using Student’s t -test on residuals after the effects of Dye and Subarray had been removed.

We then compared the cell area between the ipsilateral HMG and the “unaffected” contralateral HMG (case HMG2) and found a highly significant difference between the two hemispheres (103.4 ± 4.12 μm 2 and 140.8 ± 4.63 μm 2 in contralateral and ipsilateral hemispheres, respectively, p < .0001, Wilcoxon test).

When all observations of Xe effects on freezing at PR-LTM1 were pooled from these two independent experiments (Air-exposure, n = 20; Xe-exposure, n = 21) there was a highly significant reduction in freezing both to context alone ( t 39 = 4.63, P<0.0001) and context + tone ( t 39 = 2.16, P<0.01) compared to air-exposed controls.

MHC I was detected as faint band on the blots indicating a highly significant depletion of 15.5% compared to dEAC ord (p<0.0001).

Both Manders’ tM1 ( Figure 4F ) and tM2 ( Figure 4G ) in the DHHC7 groups were markedly elevated above 0.5 relative to control, with all differences highly significant (P < 0.0001).

A logistic linear model confirmed a highly significant effect of the treatment and genotype on the phenotypic sex, but not for the interaction term (treatment: p<0.0001; genotype: p<0.0025).

Correlations between mean LrS and mean YrS were r = 0.58 in population CA and r = 0.65 in CF. ANOVA for stripe rust and leaf rust severity resulted in highly significant effects ( p < 0.0001) for experiment, genotype and genotype × experiment interaction (Online Resource 4).

There was highly significant ( P = 0.0001) increase in heart rate as compared to base line values in all three groups after laryngoscopy and intubation, which came to baseline values by 10 th minute post-laryngoscopy and intubation.

The AMOVA analysis showed that although the most of the genetic diversity was attributable to differences among individuals within populations (85.78%), the φ ST values among populations were highly significant ( φ ST = 0.141 p< 0.0001) confirming the existence of population differentiation.

The statistical analysis showed a highly significant reduction of the lameness grade (all grades) after baseline ( P < 0.0001), and a highly significant association between lameness grade and joint effusion ( P < 0.0001).

There was significant difference between virtually all antibiotics in the two periods studied, which was commonly highly significant ( p < 0.0001); however, no difference was observed between the antibiotics used for coverage of Gram-positive bacteria, except for rifampin and oxacillin.

The difference was highly significant for CLA+ T cells: median values and ranges were 3.7% (0.9–8) in patients and 1.3% (0.5–2) in the reference subjects, P < 0.0001.

For the index, the difference in MGMT expression between the high and low miRNA samples was highly significant at p<0.0001.

[ 36 ] analyzed the Kids Inpatient Database 2003 dataset and found a highly significant hospital volume-outcome relationship based on data from 60 hospitals (p < 0.0001).

This relationship was highly significant ( r = 0.39, p < 0.0001).

The prevalence of MetS was 35.73% with a highly significant female predominance (40.12% for women and 18.56% for men; P <0.0001).

es ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ \sigma_{e}^{2} $$\end{document} σ e 2 ) were always highly significant ( P < 0.0001) for all resistance traits in both models.

In our study, rs9939609 also showed highly significant association with waist circumference in both NHS98 Chinese ( P < 0.0001) and NHS98 Malay ( P = 0.001); waist circumference data were not available for SiMES Malays.

There was a highly significant body region by modality interaction for both simultaneous ( F 2,30 = 23.8, p < 0.0001) and successive 2PD ( F 2,18 = 93.8, p < 0.0001), but no main effect of either factor (simultaneous 2PD: both factors, F < 1; successive 2PD: body region, F 2,18 = 3.0, p = 0.075; modality, F < 1).

This co-infection was highly significant, despite the co-clustering of M. mitochondrii genotype A in OTU Midichloria 1 with genotype B ( p <0.0001) ( Figure 3 ).

Highly significant seroprevalence increases (p<0.0001) from children to younger adults (15–34 years) (but not from younger to older adults >34 years) were seen for mucosal α (HPV 16), γ (HPV 4, 65) and both μ PV (HPV 1, 63).

The difference in age structure among the groups as reported by the authors in their Table 1 is, in fact, highly significant ( χ 2 =374.6; P <0.0001).

In both populations, the effect of floral display size was highly significant ( p <0.0001).

The risk was increased by about 3.5 times, irrespectively of proximality definition, and highly significant (OR = 3.58, 95% CI: 2.00–6.43, p < 0.0001; OR = 3.41, 95% CI: 1.95–5.96, p < 0.0001; respectively).