This difference between mice infected with a mixture of HSV-IL-4 and KOS compared with mice infected with each individual virus was highly significant (p=0.0001, Fisher’s exact test).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
A decline in CFU was seen sequentially with increasing passage number ( Figure 4(d) ); comparison of CFU at p1 and p3, p3 and p5, and p1 and p5 was performed using Wilcoxon matched-pairs t - test and the difference was highly significant for each analysis ( p < 0.0001).
The two-way interaction of the condition and the surface was also highly significant ( p -value < 0.0001), indicating that polishing increased the microhardness values at the top and the bottom surface.
A reduced cubic model resulted in the best fit of the data which was highly significant (p < 0.0001) with a non-significant lack of fit (0.0688).
Intragroup comparisons were highly significant (P < 0.0001), confirming effective microbial control.
Tests for heterogeneity of allele distributions were highly significant for all 19 SSR loci ( P <0.0001).
The correlation was statistically highly significant ( R 2 = 0.99, p < 0.0001). 3.2.
Unless otherwise stated, all the relationships reported are highly significant ( P <0.0001).
The model and coefficients were highly significant (model adjusted R-squared = 0.64, F-statistic = 69.74 on 9 and 334 DF, p < 0.0001).
The amount of residual disease following primary laparotomy was also highly significant (X22 = 40.8, P<0.0001).
Statistical analysis showed a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001; OR [95% CI] = 156.9200 [117.7971–196.0429]) between groups, indicating a significant elevation of PRL serum level in UL patients.
Among patients treated with sarilumab or tocilizumab, the difference in survival between the high- and low-risk groups was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).
For values of ACAG below the turning point, the association with BMD was negative, with a β coefficient of −0.006 (95% CI: −0.009, −0.004) and a highly significant P value of <0.0001.
When the occurrence of adverse events was considered in relation to the number of performed procedures, the complication rate of IO + tenotomy resulted in 38.6% (111/287), while that of IO alone was 13.9% (61/436), having statistical differences that are highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
When the data from all five experiments are pooled, this reduction is very highly significant ( P <0.0001).
After adding MTM constructs, the final model remained highly significant (F = 11.12, p < 0.0001) with an adjusted R 2 = 0.5151, indicating that 51.5% of the variance in initiation was explained.
Furthermore, both IgG1 rK39 RDTs (n = 38) and ELISAs showed a highly significant difference in test outcomes between cured patients and those who relapsed (n = 23; P < .0001).
We found a statistically highly significant difference between the two patient groups ( p < 0.0001), reflecting a good discriminant validity.
Similarly, the correlation of the infection neutralization capacity of Omicron BA.1 and NAb was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) and moderately (rho = 0.44) positive.
Results Cathodal group Transcranial direct current stimulation produced a very highly significant effect in the cathodal group, as demonstrated by a significant main effect of stimulation condition ( p < 0.0001) (Table 1 ).
Physical and psychological QoL increases after SNM implantation were highly significant ( p < 0.0001 for both), with median increases of 13 and 11.5, respectively.
The 1–100 band is shown: in a two way ANOVA, merging 20 one-second epochs, with group as between factor and pre-post wave as within factor, a highly significant pre-post wave difference was found F(1,15) = 42, p<0.0001).
Under Eligibility Criteria, inclusion criteria were reported in 80% of public summaries and 100% of GAI summaries ( p = 0.11), whereas exclusion criteria were completely absent in the public summaries (0%) but present in all GAI-generated ones (100%), representing a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001).
All these differences were highly significant at P < 0.0001.
The comparison of mean GR values between baseline and 9 months shows a reduction of 3.650 mm which is statistically highly significant ( t = 17.49, P = 0.0001).