The percentage of positive ewes in the provinces varied from 21.3% to 50.1%, with highly significant differences (p < 0.0001) ( Table 1 ).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
We found a highly significant correlation between age and HNK-1 antigen expression (r = 0.78, P < 0.0001).
We also found the level of closest designated trauma hospital was a highly significant predictor of bypass (p<0.0001) with patients less likely to be taken to the closest hospital if it was classified as regional (OR: 0.16) and rural regional (OR 0.09) compared to hospitals classified as major trauma.
A highly significant correlation was observed between the individual T/N ratio of 11 C-4DST and 18 F-FLT in the tumor ( r = 0.79, P = 0.0001).
In an observational study of eight patients, the association of NSF with infection status, both focal and systemic, was found to be highly significant ( P < 0.0001).
After day 42 after infection, the difference in CD4 + memory T cell proliferative frequencies between RMs destined for normal versus rapid progression was highly significant (P < 0.0001 by t test).
In pre/post comparison, the change in median values is highly significant (factual knowledge, p<0.0001; scientific work, p<0.0001) or significant (interprofessional work, p=0.024).
Weather Data Statistical analysis of weather data for the two seasons revealed significant differences in climatic parameters between 2020 and 2021, including temperature and rainfall, where the difference was highly significant between the two seasons ( p < 0.0001).
Table 2 shows that the model is highly significant with a low p -value ( p < 0.0001).
Accordingly, season length was highly significant in the full models (combining long and short season length) of both species ( B. hybridum p < 0.0001; H. rhagadioloides p < 0.0001; full results in Table A1 ).
Results All the parameters considered in our study showed highly significant difference in pre-treatment and post-functional values, suggesting their reliability ( p < 0.0001).
The correlation matrix shows a highly significant relationship ( r = 0.38–0.43, P < 0.0001) between all three scores (Table 4 ) indicating internal validity in scores assigned for each measure.
3 , are highly significant ( P < 0.0001 by χ 2 analysis).
We confirmed a highly significant positive correlation between these two parameters (Spearman's R = 0.74, P < 0.0001; Fig. 5 c).
of apoptotic cells from 20 μM to 120 μM compound concentration in MCF-7 breast cancer cells and it is highly significant at 100 μM and 120 μM in 5c ( P < 0.0001), 5g ( P < 0.0011, P < 0.0012), 5h ( P < 0.0001) and 5i ( P < 0.0004, P < 0.0010) treated MCF-7 cells ( Fig. 6 ).
The difference was highly significant with P = 0.0001.
The prognostic value of the 'natural' S-phase fraction was highly significant (Table 1 and Figure iB), which was also true if the cut-off was set at 2.0%, 2.5%, 3.5% or 4.0% (P < 0.0001 in all cases).
In the case of the non-sensitive membrane proteins, the motif was found only in 5 out of 143 sequences demonstrating a highly significant correlation between the presence of the motif in an SAS and its cotransin sensitivity (p value < 0.0001 according to Fisher ́s exact test) [ 21 ].
Upon review of the unblinded data, the independent data monitoring committee observed a highly significant improvement in the primary endpoint ( p < 0.0001), along with favourable trends across multiple secondary endpoints, and recommended stopping the study in October 2023.
The pattern of increases in the concentration in the plasma was highly significant within the mutant groups over time: prenatal vs. 4–6 hours [F (1,6) = 107; p < 0.0001], 4–6 hr vs 8–12 hours [F (1,6) = 54; p < 0.0001] and 8–12 hours vs 20–24 hours [F (1,4) = 152; p < 0.0001].
For instance, decreasing the incubation temperature from 37 to 30°C or room temperature, had a highly significant effect on the total aerobic count for samples collected from the low care zone ( p < 0.0001).
Results demonstrated a highly significant and substantial improvement in knowledge ( p < 0.0001, d = 1.16) and attitudes ( p < 0.0001, d = 0.79) pertaining to mental health literacy in study participants.
Results KaplanMeier analysis showed a highly significant difference in OS between the CMR and N-CMR groups (log-rank test p < 0.0001).
The difference between survival curves was highly significant for PRS2 (p < 0.0001).
The quadratic regression model was highly significant, which was evident from the F-test with a very low probability value ( p <0.0001).