Expression of Bax and caspase-9 genes revealed a highly significant increase in cancer cell lines ( p = 0.0001) when compared to the control group.
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Despite there being no significant correlation between PANSS-FSNS and SQLS-R4 baseline scores in any group, there was a highly significant correlation between the changes of these scores from baseline to week 6 that was specific to the cariprazine group in both ITT and PNS populations ( P ≤ 0.0001). 4.
ty} \oddsidemargin -1.0in \begin{document} \chi_{\left(1 \right)}^2 = \,\,\frac{{{{\left({532\,\, \times \,\,53\,\, - 13\,\, \times \,\,73} \right)}^2}\, \times \,\,671}}{{545\,\, \times \,\,126\,\, \times \,\,605\,\, \times \,\,66}} = 181.7 \end{document} The large chi-squared value evidenced a highly significant association between postoperative nausea and vomiting in surgical patients ( p < 0.0001), and the hypothesis of independence between the two symptoms was rejected.
The difference between the groups for all parameters was statistically highly significant (P<.0001, for all parameters).
For both pathogens, we found a highly significant effect of the heat treatment (F = 72.4, P < 0.0001 and F = 25.2, P < 0.0001 for P . ramorum and G . clavigera , respectively) and an interaction between treatment and time point at which the gDNA and mRNA samples were collected (F = 4.2, P < 0.001 for P . ramorum and F = 2.7, P < 0.01 for G . clavigera ).
In subjects 6–55 years of age, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) of severe disease in the presence of S pneumoniae was highly significant ( P = 0·0001).
Surprisingly, in HCs, the percentages of Vδ2 + cells and Vδ2 + Vγ9 + cells in total CD3 + T cells had highly significant positive correlations with Treg cell percentages in CD4 + T cells ( r = 0.7826, p < 0.0001; and r = 0.7848, p < 0.0001, respectively) (Figures 3 A,C).
From this functional enrichment analysis, annotation levels 1 through 3 were derived and summarized in a specific key annotation term for 170 modules ( Table S5 ), i.e., when annotation terms were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) and show a similar theme or could be linked to the enriched TF, which was included in further analyses (see following text).
A large and highly significant difference in EBNA-1 IgM/IgG/IgA levels between RA patients and HCs and between RA patients and SLE patients ( P < 0.0001 for all 3 antibody isotypes) was observed.
Analysis of variance showed highly significant variation due to year-by-genotype interaction effects ( p < 0.0001) in both HRP and CGP ( Table 2 ).
The comparison between SEA and MEA DEGs revealed 248 downregulated and 29 upregulated genes that are shared in both diseases, showing a highly significant concordance (Fisher’s exact test, p < 0.0001; Figure 3 ).
For all 16 intersections of pairs of gene lists, the enrichment was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) ( Table S2 ).
A highly significant positive correlation of ELISA results was found for all species, with Um-Zm showing the highest correlation (r s = 0.94; p < 0.0001) ( Figure 6B ).
This represents a highly significant overlap (odds ratio (OR) = 10.45, p < 0.0001, and OR = 18.74, p < 0.0001, respectively; Figure 2 ) which could explain some of the synergistic/additive effects of LMP1 and LMP2A observed in mouse B cells described above.
Following an alternative approach for scalar variables we compute the assortativity coefficient r [ 54 ] and again find highly significant homophily at the last time point r HS (6) = 0.20 ( p -value < 10 −4 ) and r U,4 (14) = 0.21 ( p -value < 10 −4 ).
However, the results were found to be statistically highly significant when correlation was done between knowledge, attitude, and practices ( p < 0.0001).
Linear regression analysis performed using the Passing-Bablok technique showed that the highly significant relationship between these two variables is given by the quadratic equation NFA FIJI = 2.78 × 10 −4 (NFL) 2 + 0.72(NFL) + 471 (solid curve in Fig. 7 ; p < 0.0001).
At T2, the difference between the two groups was highly significant (0 (0–50) copies per 10 3 HPRT1 copies vs 90 (10–190) copies per 10 3 HPRT1 copies, P< 0.0001)) ( Figure 1B ).
A two‐way ANOVA showed highly significant effects of treatment [F(1,59) = 126.4, p < 0.0001], gene [F(5,59) = 75.40, p < 0.0001], and their interaction [F(5,59) = 74.37, p < 0.0001].
There was a highly significant correlation (P<0.0001) between rice content and inorganic arsenic concentration across all infant foods.
The aspirin pH i recovery rate showed a highly significant difference in ΔpH/min compared to non-stimulated conditions, ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 2A ).
Of the 21 families, differences in abundance of 13 families (Corynebacteriaceae, Staphylococcaceae, Ruminococcaceae, Streptococcaceae, Streptococcaceae, Lachnospiraceae, Pseudomonadaceae, Sphingobacteriaceae, Bacteroidaceae, Pasteurellaceae, Dietziaceae, Veillonellaceae, and Xanthomonadaceae) in N_DF and O_DF were highly significant ( p -value <0 .0001).
Statistical analysis revealed this difference to be highly significant (t = −14.68, p <0.0001), indicating a substantially longer hospitalization for patients with more severe injuries.
The differences between the two treatments were highly significant ( p < 0.0001), for both within-group variance (higher in the independent rewards treatment) and between-group variance (higher in the interdependent treatment).
The model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) with a non-significant lack-of-fit ( p = 0.0689 > 0.05).