Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantP ≤ 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Despite there being no significant correlation between PANSS-FSNS and SQLS-R4 baseline scores in any group, there was a highly significant correlation between the changes of these scores from baseline to week 6 that was specific to the cariprazine group in both ITT and PNS populations ( P ≤ 0.0001). 4.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
ty} \oddsidemargin -1.0in \begin{document} \chi_{\left(1 \right)}^2 = \,\,\frac{{{{\left({532\,\, \times \,\,53\,\, - 13\,\, \times \,\,73} \right)}^2}\, \times \,\,671}}{{545\,\, \times \,\,126\,\, \times \,\,605\,\, \times \,\,66}} = 181.7 \end{document} The large chi-squared value evidenced a highly significant association between postoperative nausea and vomiting in surgical patients ( p < 0.0001), and the hypothesis of independence between the two symptoms was rejected.
Biostatistics: Facing the Interpretation of 2 × 2 Tables.
J Belg Soc Radiol · 2017 · PMC6251079
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
For both pathogens, we found a highly significant effect of the heat treatment (F = 72.4, P < 0.0001 and F = 25.2, P < 0.0001 for P . ramorum and G . clavigera , respectively) and an interaction between treatment and time point at which the gDNA and mRNA samples were collected (F = 4.2, P < 0.001 for P . ramorum and F = 2.7, P < 0.01 for G . clavigera ).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
From this functional enrichment analysis, annotation levels 1 through 3 were derived and summarized in a specific key annotation term for 170 modules ( Table S5 ), i.e., when annotation terms were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) and show a similar theme or could be linked to the enriched TF, which was included in further analyses (see following text).
highly significantp -value <0 .00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Of the 21 families, differences in abundance of 13 families (Corynebacteriaceae, Staphylococcaceae, Ruminococcaceae, Streptococcaceae, Streptococcaceae, Lachnospiraceae, Pseudomonadaceae, Sphingobacteriaceae, Bacteroidaceae, Pasteurellaceae, Dietziaceae, Veillonellaceae, and Xanthomonadaceae) in N_DF and O_DF were highly significant ( p -value <0 .0001).