The occurrence of galactorrhea presented with highly significant differences among age groups (Table 1 ; p < 0.0001).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
The difference in the incidence of post TIPS HE between the patients with or without sarcopenia was highly significant (p < 0.0001).
After 6 days mortality caused by all six isolates was again similar and highly significant (p<0.0001).
The activity of AMPs and Tobramycin against preformed biofilms resulted to be similar in 5 out of 6 strains tested, causing a highly significant reduction of biofilm viability compared to the controls (biofilm not exposed; p < 0.0001), regardless of the concentrations tested (Figure 3 ).
14 C-glyphosate Uptake and Translocation Assays The differences in foliar uptake of 14 C-glyphosate between the resistant hairy beggarticks populations compared to the S population were highly significant ( P < 0.0001; DF = 2; n = 60) ( Figure 3A ).
Results ANOVA showed a highly significant effect of time in all the horses for the vitamins studied ( p < 0.0001).
Anti-dsDNA and RF are the most significant predictors with the occurrence of disease in months scores as the dependent variable, the model was highly significant ( F -ratio = 5.75 and P < 0.0001).
There was a highly significant difference in body mass index (BMI) between CRC patients and controls ( P < 0.0001).
It was 0.991 (187.545, p < 0.0001) for a* , with a highly significant effect of broccoli (246.62, p < 0.0001), IF (134.344, p < 0.0001) and BSG*IF (25.77, p = 0.004).
Two-way ANOVA analysis showed a highly significant effect of stress on body weight gain [ F (1, 147) = 16.25, P < 0.0001], with a highly significant effect of day [ F (13, 147) = 6.617, P < 0.0001].However, Bonfferoni’s post hoc test showed no significant interaction between stress and day on body weight gain [ F (13, 147) = 0.468, P = 0.9393] ( Figure 3A ).
Every comparison reported highly significant differences: absolute initial angles for clockwise trials were smaller in the negative ( t 17 = -4.72, P < 10 −4 ) and positive contexts ( t 17 = -3.6, P = 0.001); for counter-clockwise perturbations the initial angles were also smaller in the negative ( t 17 = 4.03, P < 10 −4 ) and positive contexts ( t 17 = -3.61, P = 0.001, one-sided paired t-tests).
Effects of v init on a max were statistically highly significant ( F 3, 213 = 1287, P < .0001).
The difference was highly significant ( p = 0.0001).
For the 531 melanomas evaluated, the enrichment of BRAF fusions in Spitzoid melanomas (9/12, 75%) compared to non‐Sptizoid tumors (5/519, 1%) was highly significant ( p = 0.0001).
There was a statistically highly significant association between the type of antithrombotic therapy and both midline shift and size of the CSDH ( p < 0.0001), but not GCS levels ( p = 0.1956) (Table 2 ).
The overall correlation coefficient observed between C6 and C6 Plus was highly significant ( P < 0.0001; r = 0.992; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.982–0.997).
Quantitative HI suv demonstrated a highly significant correlation with visual heterogeneity ( r = 0.5, p < 0.0001).
A decreasing trend was seen in the diameter of the nanofibres upon adding more micro-capsules, with 16% PMD micro-capsules showing the smallest average diameter and a large size distribution (386 ± 55 nm) against the blank (408 ± 67 nm). The results presented in figure 3 b–d show that the emulsion spun nanofibres with permethrin, catnip and chilli oil had a highly significant effect on the average diameter of the resulting nanofibres (all p < 0.0001).
In contrast, the topological polar surface area showed minimal overlap and a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001, paired two-sided t -test) between aglycones and saponins.
Thus, unpaired t -test reported a highly significant difference between the surface characteristics of control arch-wires and the test arch-wires ( P = 0.0001) [ Table 1 and Figure 4 ].
The statistical analyses show that quadratic models fit very well into the data for the response and the responses were highly significant (p < 0.0001).
Increases in the number of IFNγ responding cells were significant from 42 dpi [Lv17/WB/Rie1 ( p < 0.01) and Arm07 ( p < 0.001)] and highly significant ( p < 0.0001) from 49 dpi.
In slices from animals exposed to kynurenine and probenecid, galantamine increased the plateau LTP even further, with ANOVA indicating a highly significant increase compared with controls ( F (9,70) = 57.8, P < 0.0001) and with all individual points significantly different at P < 0.0001.
The primary analysis showed a highly significant treatment effect overall across all four time points (−17.4 mm; 95% confidence interval: −22.3 to −12.5 mm; p < 0.0001).
The positive correlation between tea consumption and total flavonoids was highly significant, with an R2 = 0.7968 ( p < 0.0001).