“highly significant”

On comparison of the proportion of the patients requiring only the ST graft, the p value came out to be highly significant ( p < 0.0001), showing that the ST tendon alone is enough when using the weave technique to achieve the required graft diameter.

For these patients with detectable cell proliferation, inhibitor treatment resulted in a highly significant antiproliferative effect compared to untreated controls ( p ≤ 0.0001, Kruskal Wallis test, Dunn ́s post-hoc test), for all inhibitors except lonidamine and AZD3965.

We found a highly significant correlation between the extent of intermingling and translocation frequency ( p < 0.0001; Figure 2 B), such that higher levels of CT intermingling increase the chances of double-strand breaks (DSBs) being involved in rearrangements with other chromosomes.

To ensure concordance between data generated in our MHRP laboratory and previously published CATNAP data, we performed a bridging analysis using 3 PSVs and 18 NAbs and observed a highly significant correlation between IC 50 endpoints ( S2 Fig , p<0.0001, r = 0.9043).

Body conformation indices of pelvic index, body index, transversal pelvic index and weight were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) among the studied districts.

Drug concentration (X 2 ) The concentration of IVM in the liquid dispersion had a highly significant main effect ( p < 0.0001) on the PDI values.

Bartlett's test of sphericity, which is sensitive to smaller sample sizes, was highly significant ( p > 0.0001) ( Worthington and Whittaker, 2006 ).

The progression in HHS values across the follow-up period was found to be highly significant (p < 0.0001) using one-way ANOVA.

This difference was highly significant (p < 0.0001).

Using the same statistical procedure described for Figure 2 , this overlap between the experimental data and the theoretical prediction is highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

No protective habits were associated with the frequency of the outcome.- Among the different types of work, one is highly significant-forest work (RR= 1.43, 95% CI 1.22-1.69, p< 10-4).

On average, only 4.9 ± 0.7% of proliferating normal epithelial cells in TDLUs simultaneously expressed ER-α, compared with 27.6 ± 2.2% in HELUs, which was also a highly significant difference ( P < 0.0001).

For the 170 workers with measured TCDD levels greater than 10 ppt, the Spearman correlation between their cumulative exposure scores and the back- extrapolated lipid levels was highly significant (rho = 0.65, p = 0.0001).

The differences in gene-expression ratios corresponding to 1-, 1.5- and 3-fold dose changes on chromosome 2L are highly significant ( p << 10 -4 by ANOVA followed by Tukey HSD, Hodges-Lehmann, and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests; see Materials and methods).

Furthermore, matrine at 128 ng/mL had a very highly significant anti-BVDV effect compared to this extract at 4, 8, 16 and 32 ng/mL (P-value < 0.0001), and had a significant anti-BVDV effect compared to 64 ng/mL (P-value < 0.05).

One-way ANOVA ( Tables S1 and S3 ) further indicated that the overall model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), with experimental data closely fitting the predictive model.

While this makes logical sense, a closer look at table 2 and figure 3 shows that global longitudinal strain (GLS) has a highly significant correlation (r = 0.61, P = .0001).

This was mainly because the relative risk (95% CI) of false positive recall among current users of tibolone was 0.76 (0.52–1.10) compared to women who had never used HRT, and the difference in the relative risk of false positive recall between women currently using oestrogen-only, oestrogen-progestagen and tibolone was highly significant (χ 2 2 (heterogeneity) = 21.0, p < 0.0001).

Results ANOVA Results of a conventional analysis of variance of the log-transformed data for grain yield indicated highly significant genotype x stress-level interaction (p<0.0001).

The log-rank test showed a highly significant difference in the risk of developing BE between the groups (chi-square (χ2) = 748.93, p < 0.0001), indicating that the timing of disease onset differed greatly.

Differences between concentrations were highly significant (P < 0.0001; F 6,45 = 26.92).

These analyses revealed strong correlations across all three internal data sets (all rho >0.89), with highly significant P values (all P values < 0.0001) (Supplementary Fig. 4a–c ).

Two-way ANOVA showed a highly significant effect of time ( p < 0.0001), a significant effect of group ( p < 0.0001), and a significant interaction effect between the two groups ( p < 0.0001).

When the statistic test was applied only to saliva, lingual plaque, and supragingival plaque data, the differences in the microbiota between individuals was highly significant (repeated measures ANOVA, P < 0.0001).

Paired Wilcoxon rank sum tests revealed highly significant differences ( P < 0.0001 for BLAST and k-mer matching) in accuracy favoring the rRNA operon.