“highly significant”

There was a highly significant correlation between high serum galectin levels and the incidence of both non-progressive and progressive retinopathy ( P value=0.0001).

A One-Way ANOVA with repeated measures shows that the difference between conditions was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), whereas there were no differences between run 1 and run 2 (see Tables 2a and 2b ).

We found highly significant elevations in AST, ALT, and total bilirubin levels (109.96 U/L, 70.17 U/L and 1.25 mg/dL, respectively; p < 0.0001) in group 3 rats after they were treated with 40% ethanol only compared with the control group.

Compared to baseline (2.2 ± 1.4), the decline in AGM was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) at 1-week, 1-month, and 3-months follow-up with respective mean AGMs of 0.5 ± 0.7, 1 ± 1.1, and 1.4 ± 1.2.

The LOD scores obtained for the QTL in both families were highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

Firstly, the gesture-only conditions (blurred, pointing, give-me gestures) were statistically investigated in a 2-way ANOVA (Time window × Gesture type) calculated across the three time windows, which revealed a highly significant interaction (F(4, 96) = 8.47, ε = 0.66, p = 0.0001, η p 2 = 0.26).

A quantitative analysis on day seven revealed highly significant differences in the number, size and roundness of the spheroids generated by D5 cells compared to control NIH3T3 cells ( p < 0.0001) (Fig. 3 b).

In animals subjected to the streptozotocin protocol (STZ-DPN), there was a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) reduction (95%) in PWT (>0.12 g i.e., static mechanical allodynia) which was restored to a level that was comparable to the saline-treated group (>2.5 g) by the dose of gabapentin (75 mg/kg) as the positive control standard drug ( Figures 1A–C ).

Inclisiran produced a mean LDL-C reduction of −46.5% at day 150 versus +1.4% with placebo and −11.2% with ezetimibe; the between-group differences were large and highly significant (inclisiran vs. placebo −47.9%, and vs. ezetimibe −35.4%; P < 0.0001 for both comparisons) [ 30 ].

The sEMG recording allowed highly significant discrimination between most of the exercises ( p < 0.0001) but some failed.

In the moderator test, the estimated model was highly significant with QM ( df = 4) = 41.21 and p < 0.0001.

There was a highly significant positive correlation between CD25+ OX40+ CD4 T cell responses to RBD and CD4 T cell proliferation responses to RBD (pearsons’ rho=0.89, p <0.0001) ( Figure 1D ), as we have previously reported for a variety of other recall antigens ( 20 ).

The ANCOVA analysis revealed highly significant differences between the elevations (F = 19.07, DFn = 1, DFd = 205, P < 0.0001). 3.2.3 Determination of antibody avidity maturation We determined the relative avidity index to appraise the antibody binding strength ( Fig 5 ).

In lung adenocarcinoma, the most predictive signature generated from the Kim and colleagues ( 38 ) dataset revealed no association with survival when derived from ldvae [ P = 0.25 or −log 10 ( P ) = 0.6], whereas the BBKNN signature showed a highly significant predictive capacity [ P = 1e−4 or −log 10 ( P ) = 4; Fig. 5B ].

Not surprisingly, all six regressions are also highly significant (p < .0001).

During the initial 6 months of the study, the cyclosporine A group had consistently lower IOP than the betamethasone group, which was statistically highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

The sEPSC frequency in these cells was 4.20 ± 4.36 Hz, which was greater than the mEPSC frequency (1.06 ± 1.39 Hz), and this difference was highly significant ( P < 0.0001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Fig. 9 D).

Under 200 mg/kg of Cd 2+ , the Cd 2+ contamination in the shoots and roots of transgenic plants was 24.6−30.5% and 45.5−51.3% higher than that of the WT, respectively ( Figure 4 c,d), and all of the transgenic lines showed a highly significant difference compared with the WT ( p < 0.0001).

The foliar area consumed with infestation at flowering ( Fig 9 Left) showed a highly significant effect of Species, Stage, Variety, Species x Variety and Species x Stage x Variety (p<0.0001 in all the cases), as well as a Stage x Species (p = 0.0019) and Stage x Variety (p = 0.0042).

There was a highly significant increase of 40% (relative risk (RR): 1.4; [1.27, 1.55]; p < 0.0001) in admission rates in the female children’s and the adolescents’ group (RR:1.32; [1.24, 1.41]; p< 0.0001) between the pre-COVID-19 and peri-COVID-19 periods in 2019 and 2021, respectively.

repens between healthy dogs and dogs with babesiosis (38.3 % versus 89.7 %) was highly significant (Fisher’s exact test, P < 0.0001).

The SiO 2 content in the hybrid materials is described by a statistically highly significant model ( p < 0.0001) with a high robustness R2 pred = 0.9459 and, hence, a good predictive power ( Table 2 ).

In the study provided in European countries, it was stated that there was a highly significant difference of 25(OH)D levels across European countries ( p < 0.0001) among women in the postmenopausal period.

The according risk of developing oral cancer was 0.65% and 0.18%, whereby the risk difference of 0.47% was highly significant ( p < 0.0001; Log-Rank test).

All variables but sex ( p = 0.814), upper quadrant periodontal assessment ( p = 0.513), and lower quadrant periodontal assessment ( p = 0.285) showed highly significant differences between the high-risk and low-risk clusters ( p < 0.0001).