“highly significant”

There was a significant difference between the groups ( F [2,137] = 3.6; P = 0.031) and a highly significant interaction term ( F [2,137] = 13.1; P < 0.0001; full ANOVA results are in SI Appendix , Table 2 ), confirming that the groups behaved differently in the two cueing conditions.

The difference in incidence of GCaMP expression in Cre-expressing and Cre-lacking neurons is highly significant ( p < 0.0001; Fisher’s exact test). 10.1523/ENEURO.0373-21.2022.f7-1 Extended Data Figure 7-1 Cre-dependent expression is limited to peripheral neurons.

We found a highly significant elevation in QTd among patients with AWMI compared to other MI types (98.96 ± 2.95 ms vs. 85.08 ± 17.02 ms; p < 0.0001)​.

To investigate this, we conducted a Chi-square test, which revealed a highly significant difference ( P < .0001).

Compared to the manual approach of biometric data export and intraocular lens calculation (76.7 ± 12.3 s) as well as the manual export of the reference image to a portable external storage device (26.8 ± 5.5 s), a highly significant saving of time was achieved ( p < 0.0001).

Upon co-inoculation, the phosphatase activity was enhanced and highly significant ( p -value < 0.0001), with a nearly 3-fold increase in the accumulation of phosphate ( Figure 2 ). 3.4.

In particular, the difference was highly significant in the case of ALS (controls: 9098.68 ± 1210.76 pg/mL; ALS: 17,235.3 ± 1033.2; p < 0.0001), and AD (18,496.00 ± 1165.27; p < 0.001) and less in the case of ID (16,180.35 ± 1323.65; p = 0.004).

In contrast, in YNP we observed a highly significant negative correlation between thermoregulatory behavior and temperatures (air and soil) (air temperature: r = −0.224, P < 0.0001; soil temperature: r = −0.153, P = 0.0037).

Although the serum 25(OH)D3 levels of subjects were significantly lower in March (14.11 ± 1.259 ng/mL) than in May (17.67 ± 1.342 ng/mL; p = 0.0013, paired t test), the correlation between the two sampling points was highly significant (r = 0.717, p < 0.0001).

For TNJ, no significant difference was found between modalities in young mice (p = 0.8591), whereas a highly significant difference was observed in the old group (p < 0.0001).

A response surface analysis shows both MCPNN and MNPR have highly significant effects ( P < 0.0001) on DDTH [DDTH = 1475.34 + (147.92*MCPNN) - (148512.8*MNPR)], explaining 77.54% of the variation (Figure 2 ).

Other Clinical Efficacy Results The mean changes from baseline in the IKDC subjective score, which ranges from 0 (worst result) to 100 (best result), were highly significant at all time points (i.e., P < 0.0001; including Month 3) and increased in their extent through Month 24 (LS mean increase from baseline: 41.6 ± 1.9 points; 95% CI: 37.9-45.4).

In discrete time survival analyses, lower baseline UPSIT scores were associated with transition to AD (hazard ratio 1.099 per point interval; 95% CI: 1.067, 1.131; P <0.0001) and remained highly significant (hazard ratio 1.072 per point interval; 95% CI: 1.036, 1.109; P <0.0001) after including demographic, cognitive, and functional covariates. 41 The study by Devanand et al 41 confirmed that impairment in olfactory recognition in a population with normal cognitive function more accurately predicted decline of cognitive function than assessment of verbal episodic memory and supported the cross-cultural application of inexpensive olfactory recognition tests as bio-markers for predicting decline in cognitive function and early stage AD.

This is confirmed by what is shown in Table 9 , where the results of the analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that the model as a whole was highly significant ( P < 0.0001), and the model adequacy was confirmed by several statistical indicators.

The point of parturition (P) itself marks a highly significant decrease in albumin levels in RFM cows compared to NP cows ( p < 0.0001), reflecting a major physiological impact during this critical time.

Subsequent validation revealed a highly significant positive correlation ( r = 0.91; p < 0.0001) between RNA-seq and RT-qPCR results indicating a high reliability of the RNA-seq data.

There was a highly significant difference in the serum Ki-67 concentrations between healthy dogs and dogs with non-neoplastic diseases ( p < 0.0001, Figure 2 ).

In patients with locally advanced disease or node positivity (pN1–3) proven by RC, AC (compared with SC) provided no OS benefit, despite a highly significant improvement in 5-year progression-free survival (47.6% with AC vs. 31.8% with SC, P < 0.0001).

Then, we confirmed this highly significant correlation between carriage and ESBL-Ec FUTI when analysing combinations of virulence genes (rho = 0.90, P < 0.0001), MLST (rho = 0.99, P = 0.0003), and serotypes (rho = 0.97, P = 0.005 respectively, Figure 1b–d ).

Highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001) in various trait values such as photosynthesis rate, transpiration rate, leaf-level water use efficiency, internal CO 2 concentration, shoot dry weight, root dry weight, ratio of deep rooting, root number, and root diameter were observed between the two treatments.

Highly significant genotypic variation ( p < 0.0001) was observed for all the phenotypic traits collected in Experiment 2 with heritabilities ranging from 0.67 to 0.86 ( Table 1 ).

Note that the changes for all non-linear features are highly significant ( p < 0.0001, Table 3 ).

Effect of temperature on yield traits The analysis of the variance (Table 4 ) showed that the variety had a very highly significant effect ( P ≤ 0.0001) on the days to 1% flowering, the days to 50% flowering, the days to maturity of grains, the width of grains, the weight of 1000 grains and the average yield per plant.

The intercept was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), indicating a consistent baseline effect.

The catalyst-to-sorbent ratio (C), the solid flux (D), the riser diameter (A), the inlet temperature (B), and the gas velocity (E) were very highly significant, with P -values < 0.0001, in descending order.