“highly significant”

In contrast, the coefficient of skewness (γ skew ) is negative and highly significant (−0.0021, t = −4.0245, p = 0.0001).

MFI showed highly significant expression differences for CD38, CD81, CD19, and CD200 (p < 0.0001).

The results showed a highly significant correlation between meniscal injuries on MRI and intraoperative findings ( p < 0.0001).

Diagnostic potential of miR-363 According to ROC curve analysis, miR-363 covered a highly significant ( P <0.0001) area in both PCa tissue (0.969; sensitivity: 85%; specificity 100%) as well as serum (0.988; sensitivity: 97.5%; specificity: 87.5%) ( Fig. 3A & B).

From a quantitative standpoint, the ANOVA test showed a highly significant difference among groups for the overall scores (F = 19.14, p < 0.0001).

Its performance was superior to that of all other primary reagents, with the difference being significant at P < 0.05 when compared to Y145 and highly significant (P < 0.0001) when compared to both EP (RD) and the polyclonal antiserum.

By 72 hours, a highly significant (p < 0.0001) significant reduction in p-AKT/AKT levels was noted across all treatment groups.

A one-way ANOVA test conducted across all transformer-based models yielded a highly significant result (F = 163, p < 0.0001), clearly indicating that model performance in terms of accuracy was not uniform.

On day 16, the median sizes were 180.0 nm in the positive control and 84.0 nm in the experimental group, with highly significant differences (p ≤ 0.0001, δ = −0.49).

arnfieldi infection, with statistical analysis showing a highly significant variation ( p < 0.0001).

Comparing the survival rates of patients with different histopathological tumor gradings showed a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 2 ).

Patients with bone pain at study inclusion demonstrated a distinct bone-centric disease pattern, characterized by highly significant increases in osteolytic lesions with structural instability risk (25% vs. 11%, p = 0.0001) and higher prevalence of CRAB-B already present at ID (90% vs. 78%, p = 0.003).

Among the departures from the early burst model, there is a highly significant skew to the right, as shown by the D CDF test on the EB fit ( p < 0.0001).

A highly significant association between CEI and mortality was noted (p < 0.0001), with mortality reduction of 8.1 (CI: 6.6–9.6) per 1000 units CEI.

Statistical analysis using the Wilcoxon test confirmed that the differences between ODHP and ODHP-NS at 1/2 MIC and 1/4 MIC were highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

A highly significant positive correlation existed between FDK and DON/NIV content ( R = 0.84, P < 0.0001).

A significant increase of several amino acids including phenylalanine (Phe, p < 0.01), tryptophan (Trp, p < 0.001), and tyrosine (Tyr, p < 0.0001), as well as isoleucine (Ile, p < 0.05), glutamate (Glu, p < 0.05), glutamine (Gln, p < 0.05), and glycine (Gly, p < 0.05) was observed, whereas a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) decrease in cysteine (Cys) was measured.

Furthermore, the 200 mg/kg BW dose resulted in an even more pronounced elevation in serum iron levels, with a highly significant difference compared to the control group (p-value <0.0001).

The significant effect of irrigation on stem length was observed only at later growth stages, with significance emerging at 3 MAT ( p<0.01 ) and becoming highly significant at 4 MAT (p<0.0001) .

A two-way ANOVA showed a highly significant effect of RVT ( p < 0.0001).

The baseline AIS grade effect on the fraction of two-grade improvements in the STASCIS and the present study’s databases were both highly significant, p < 0.0001.

Statistical analysis revealed a significant increase in OD of all treated groups, with DEHP treated groups showing significantly higher levels than DBP treated groups; moreover, the highest dose of DBP exhibited a highly significant increase compared to the lower DBP doses ( p < 0.0001; F 6,63 = 20.10; ƞp 2 = 0.66; Fig. 12 h).

Fisher's Exact Test indicated a highly significant association between screening modalities and biopsy findings ( p < 0.0001).

ObStruct using Structure output at K = 2 and 8 sampling locations as predefined populations shows these to be strongly correlated ( R 2 = 0.39, P ≤ 0.0001) and using sampling locations with Structure output for K = 4 had a weaker correlation, though still highly significant ( R 2 = 0.27, P ≤ 0.0001).

We then confirmed the intergroup similarity by the highly significant correlations for the normal and LPMC/F3 groups (within: R S = 0.87, n = 27, P < 0.0001; between: R S = 0.75, n = 64, P < 0.0001) ( Fig. 5 C ), as well as for the normal and extra groups (within: R S = 0.76, P < 0.0001; between: R S = 0.66, P < 0.0001) ( Fig. 5 D ).