“highly significant”

Although temperature had a modest overall effect (F(1,48) = 4.177; p = 0.0465; η 2 = 0.0097), its interaction with seed coat phenotype was highly significant (F(5,48) = 11.90; p < 0.0001; η 2 = 0.1382) ( Table 2 and File S2—Table S5 ), suggesting that thermal conditions selectively enhance the expression of specific seed colors already intrinsic to the species.

In the statistical analysis of the number of survivors, a highly significant effect was found (Omnibus test: likelihood ratio chi-squared test = 112.414, d.f. = 1, p < 0.0001).

A highly significant association between CEI and mortality was noted (p < 0.0001), with mortality reduction of 8.1 (CI: 6.6–9.6) per 1000 units CEI.

These findings underscore the substantial impact of the test treatment in promoting hair growth rate, with a highly significant p-value of <0.0001 (Figure 2 ).

25 Furthermore, during milk OIT, the risk of reactions and the need for epinephrine treatment was highly significant ( p < 0.0001). 25 These patients were also at a higher risk of OIT discontinuation or not achieving full desensitization.

The overall effect test result is highly significant ( z = 4.17; p < 0.0001), underscoring a consistent and statistically significant difference favouring the group with disabilities.

The GWAS analysis revealed a total of 80 highly significant Bonferroni corrected SNPs ( p < 0.0001 (−log10 ( p ) = 9.45) located on eight autosomes ( Table S1 ).

Using a mixed model to allow for correlation of the data, we found a highly significant difference (p < 0.0001) between weak and strong tapping ( Figure 1d ).

In all three studies, the primary endpoint was achieved, with a highly significant reduction in PANSS total score from baseline to endpoint (p < 0.0001).

Except for the physical summary score of the SF36 questionnaire, all the subjective scores indicated a highly significant ( P < 0.0001) improvement in the participants' ability to cope with stress.

At 38 days, when the first animal required euthanasia because of tumor size, tumors were 1,764 ± 1,526 mm 3 in the CA9 group and 126 ± 130 mm 3 in the control group ( Figure 5B ); differences in tumor growth were highly significant ( P <0.0001, twoway repeated measure analysis of variance with the Geisser-Greenhouse correction).

All differences were highly significant (p < 0.0001, 95% CI).

5C , p < 0.001, n = 14–27/group), specifically resulting from a highly significant reduction in the length of non-apical dendrites (Fig. 5D , p < 0.0001, n = 14–27/group), in line with previous observations related to increased expression of xlr3b and xlr4b [ 61 ].

A highly significant main effect of treatment was found for turn angle, F (4, 45) = 14.25, p < 0.0001 ( Figure 2 D), indicating substantial changes in movement trajectory or re-orientation behavior between groups.

The analysis of variance showed that Our results in children with neuroblastoma and ganglio- there were highly significant differences between the groups neuroblastoma mirrored those previously reported (Ishiguro (P=0.0001).

These results yielded highly significant class distinction between NEC and Sepsis (AUC = 0.958; p < 0.0001 ) ( Fig. 2C ) as well as NEC and control (AUC = 0.91; p < 0.0001 ) ( Supplemental Fig. 3 ).

We further plotted the MAGEA3 protein score versus the DUB3 protein score for individual HCC patients, which revealed a highly significant correlation (linear regression R 2 = 0.63, p < 1 × 10 −4 ; Figure 3 H).

The computerized-aided scores showed a moderate to highly significant negative correlation with forced vital capacity (FVC) ( r = −0.490; P < 0.0001), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) ( r = −0.675; P < 0.0001) and the single breath carbon monoxide diffusing capacity of the lung (DLco) ( r = −0.653; P < 0.0001) ( Figure 3 ). 3.3.

While comparing between two groups a statistically highly significant difference found between the groups ( P < 0.0001) and group C maintains hemodynamics more steadily than group G.

( 11 ) and the analysis of variance in Table 4 , the model shows a highly significant fit with P < 0.0001, the lack-of-fit is not significant (P = 0.8173 > 0.05), indicating no lack-of-fit exists.

* indicates p‐value 0.01 to 0.05 (significant) ** indicates p‐value 0.001 to 0.01 (very significant) *** indicates p < 0.001 (highly significant) **** indicates p < 0.0001 (extremely significant) 4.14.

The difference among the groups was highly significant ( P < .0001).

In slices from animals exposed to kynurenine and probenecid, galantamine increased the plateau LTP even further, with ANOVA indicating a highly significant increase compared with controls ( F (9,70) = 57.8, P < 0.0001) and with all individual points significantly different at P < 0.0001.

Two-way ANOVA analysis of the hemorrhage area for the FUS Intensity groups indicates a highly significant main effect of FUS intensity (p < 0.0001).

The interaction between current density and treatment time plays a decisive role in coating development, with a highly significant effect on hardness (IT = − 18.25, p < 0.0001).