“highly significant”

Besides, the other variants showed highly significant differences of the HDL-C with different genotypes in both sexes (all p- values < 0.0001).

A response surface analysis shows both MCPNN and MNPR have highly significant effects ( P < 0.0001) on DDTH [DDTH = 1475.34 + (147.92*MCPNN) - (148512.8*MNPR)], explaining 77.54% of the variation (Figure 2 ).

Diagnostic potential of miR-363 According to ROC curve analysis, miR-363 covered a highly significant ( P <0.0001) area in both PCa tissue (0.969; sensitivity: 85%; specificity 100%) as well as serum (0.988; sensitivity: 97.5%; specificity: 87.5%) ( Fig. 3A & B).

Statistical analysis confirmed highly significant differences in the levels of neutrophils, RBCs, PCV, Hb, MCH, urea, creatinine, total protein, albumin, globulin, A/G ratio, and PCT ( p < 0.0001 for each), as well as CRP ( p = 0.002), among infections caused by PDR, XDR, and MDR isolates.

Highly significant antibacterial activity (**** p < 0.0001) was detected at concentrations ≥ 15 mg/mL.

The model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), with a coefficient of determination R 2 = 0.99 and an adjusted R 2 = 0.98, indicating that the model accurately explains the variability in the response.

Treatment with cell-free supernatant from LSSA01 resulted in a robust increase in phagocytosis, reaching 286.1 ± 28.6%, which was highly significant compared with the control ( p < 0.0001).

Mann–Whitney U test revealed that 11 of 13 phyla (except Actinobacteriota and Nitrospirota) showed highly significant differences between rhizosphere and bulk soils ( Table S2 : **** p < 0.0001).

The paired t-test values between NZ and SC are highly significant for Olsen P t (1, 19) 5.45, p < 0.0001; Total N t (1, 19) 4.73, p < 0.0001, and pH t (1, 19) -18.4, p < 0.0001 respectively.

Line was highly significant for all field environments ( P < 0.0001 ) and greenhouse incubation period ( P = 0.0464), but not for the greenhouse DLA measurements ( P = 0.2187) (Table 1 ).

The quadratic equation generated from the models ( Figure 2 ) is the following Equation (2): (2) Rupture strength = −71.72 + 19.14A + 15.99B + 3381.93C + 4.78D − 0.43AB + 136.21AC − 0.29AD − 460.12BC + 0.88BD − 79.31CD − 4.30A2 − 32560.72C2 − 0.22D2 − 3.43B2 The compressive strength response surface model was highly significant (F = 22.36, p < 0.0001, Table S3 ), accounting for 91.16% of the total variation ( R 2 = 0.9116, adjusted R 2 = 0.9116, predicted R 2 = 0.834) with a non-significant lack-of-fit ( p = 0.683), confirming the model reliability.

For all interactions, the global null hypothesis test was highly significant ( P ‐value < .0001).

In contrast, the LGG cohort showed highly significant separation of survival curves, with the low-risk group demonstrating markedly improved outcomes ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure S3E ).

The impact of each factor on the model is considered highly significant ( p ≤ 0.0001), and according to the F-values, the order of the influence of extraction conditions on LRM-ELN yield is as follows: A (concentration of PEG6000) > B (relative centrifugal force) > C (incubation time), indicating that the concentration of PEG6000 is the key factor affecting the yield.

Results: Patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma exhibited significantly elevated levels of epithelial membrane antigen and cytokeratin-1 compared to non-hepatocellular carcinoma patients, with a highly significant statistical difference ( P < .0001).

The regression model was highly significant, with an F-value of 76.68 and p < 0.0001.

When comparing mean BOP values in G1 IL versus G1 IC, a statistically significant reduction was observed ( p = 0.0182) in T1 versus T0 and a highly significant difference between T2 and T1 ( p < 0.0001).

The overall model was highly significant, with a model p -value < 0.0001, whereas the lack of fit was not significant ( p > 0.05).

3.2 Lennox–Gastaut syndrome The global association between etiological group and LGS was highly significant (Fisher's Exact Test, p < 0.0001).

Strong and highly significant positive correlations were observed between IVS volume and both gestational age (Pearson’s r = 0.891, p < 0.0001; Spearman’s ρ = 0.920, p < 0.0001) as well as estimated fetal weight (Pearson’s r = 0.860, p < 0.0001; Spearman’s ρ = 0.927, p < 0.0001).

Conversely, highly significant differences were observed comparing NMRs between the LICs ( P <0.0001: ET vs.

In sunn hemp, BACIII treatment induced a highly significant increase ( p < 0.0001) in all pigments compared with both controls ( Figure 8 ).

This is illustrated for this cohort, examining the 55 CVID subjects with inflammatory complications (Group 2) as compared to 59 other CVID subjects without these medical issues (Group 1) or 21 normal controls, showing highly significant differences between the patient groups (P = 0.0001.) Fig. 1 A .

The results showed a highly significant correlation between meniscal injuries on MRI and intraoperative findings ( p < 0.0001).

The inhibition by Lr6127 CFS was highly significant for all three pathogen groups relative to the medium control ( p < 0.0001; Figure 1 A).