Intriguingly, however, we observed a modest, yet highly significant positive correlation between FBXW7 and MYC expression, exclusively in the Luminal A-subtype of breast cancers (rho=0.28, p=0.0004) (Figure 4A ).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
This proportional difference was highly significant (p = 0.0004).
Subsequent PCR- based HPV typing using type - specific primers revealed 32% were infected with HPV type 16 whereas 6% were found to be positive for HPV type 18, while in BPH controls only 5% of the BPH controls were infected with HPV 16 and this difference was highly significant (p = 0.0004).
By contrast, the quadratic term of reaction time (C2) is highly significant (p = 0.0004; F = 26.82), demonstrating that the system is strongly governed by nonlinear behavior associated with this variable.
These differences were statistically highly significant (Figure 4 A, t = -3.59, P = 0.0004; Figure 4 B, t = -2.59, P = 0.01; see “seedling survival”).
We observed a highly significant interaction between reported witnessed apneas and baseline plasma glucose level, p = 0.0004.
In the stunting model, Factor 2 showed a highly significant positive effect ( p = 0.0004; OR = 1.2368), implying that higher pre‐ and post‐monsoon temperatures are linked to higher odds of stunting.
Results There was a highly significant improvement in symptoms: PUQE score improved from 14.5+/− 1 to 7.5+/− 0.58( p = 0.0004).
As shown in Table 2 , after adjusting for the highly significant class variable (p = .0004) of the current DRG category, no differences could be demonstrated among the hospitals (p = .27).
However, since significant terms were highly significant ( p <0.0004 in all cases) and non-significant terms were highly non-significant ( p >0.1259 in all cases), there is no ambiguity in the results.
This difference is highly significant (p<.0004, Fisher’s exact test, two-tailed); furthermore, the sole novel nonsynonymous variant detected in an African-American POAG case ( Table 3 ) was not predicted to be pathogenic.
Group × time interactions were highly significant for LV dimensions, both LVIDd (F (4,40) = 6.57, p = 0.0004) and LVIDs (F (4,40) = 6.76, p = 0.0003), reflecting progressive dilatation in the MI-only group and attenuated increases in chamber size in the MI + HIIT group, with minimal changes in non-infarcted groups.
The difference in specific binding was highly significant (p = 0.0004).
Precisely, PAL was more correlated with the non-reducing sugars ( R 2 =0.9767, p =0.0002) than reducing and total soluble sugars, while anthocyanin exhibited a highly significant correlation with non-reducing sugars ( R 2 =0.969, p =0.0004) and total soluble sugars ( R 2 =0.9686, p =0.0004) compared to the reducing sugars.
Results: The results of this screening study showed that ADHD is highly significant associated with gender (p = 0.0004).
The levels of VLDLR-AS1 were lower in the rmTBI samples compared to the no lifetime TBI samples, and this difference was highly significant ( p = 0.0004), indicating that VLDLR-AS1 is a strong, viable indicator of rmTBI.
T CM /T EM ratio has been used to reflect the differentiation status of T cells ( 38 ), We therefore compared this parameter before and after GC treatment and found a highly significant increase ( P = 0.0004) of the T CM /T EM ratio among CD8 + T cells after GC treatment ( Figure 7C ).
This difference in uptake between [ 18 F]-FACBC and [ 18 F]-FET was highly significant for the MM.1S ev/ev xenograft tumors ( p = 0.0004).
We point out that the MCD index for the LC → Fz is generally lower overall that the other pathways ( Table 4 ), though still highly significant ( p = 0.0004) at the group level.
The model to optimize the AzA-TEs was highly significant ( p -value = 0.0004) ( Figure 1 E,F).
When the TTRS was included, the goodness of fit of the multivariable model was highly significant (R 2 = 0.84, p = 0.0004; LoF p = 0.99), and the variables significantly associated with the CFR were BCS ( p = 0.004), the skeletal score ( p < 0.0001) and the TTRS itself ( p = 0.008).
Outcomes Symptom Scores Improved by Healing Pre- and post-treatment scores are summarized as median (interquartile ranges) in Table 2 , which shows changes that were highly significant statistically (all P < 0.0004) towards improvement during the study period.
There was no difference in the slopes ( P = 0.58), but the difference in elevation was highly significant ( P = 0.0004), indicating that WT and M/Mt-CK −/− hearts do not share the same relationship for d P /d t max versus heart rate, but instead run in parallel (i.e. for any given heart rate, d P /d t max is lower in M/Mt-CK −/− hearts).
The effect size for O 2 uptake disturbance (as per SpO 2 outcome) is relatively smaller but highly significant ( p = 0.0004; Figures 2A , B , 9A ).
Indeed, Spearman’s correlation analysis of the OMAP index and pregnenolone production in U87MG cells treated with micromolar concentrations of the compounds revealed a highly significant p value ( p = 0.0004, Figure 3 ).