Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp = 0.00040.0× alphaqualifiedgold
These groups demonstrated highly significant improvements in OS (Bm2 hi /CCL3 lo HR = 0.14 (95%CI:0.04–0.49) p = 0.0004; Bm2 hi /CCL4 lo HR = 0.21 (95%CI:0.08–0.57), p = 0.001; and Bm2 hi /CXCL8 lo HR = 0.29 (95%CI:0.11–0.76), p = 0.007, Figure 5 ).
highly significantp=0.00040.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Intriguingly, however, we observed a modest, yet highly significant positive correlation between FBXW7 and MYC expression, exclusively in the Luminal A-subtype of breast cancers (rho=0.28, p=0.0004) (Figure 4A ).
MYC is a critical target of FBXW7.
Oncotarget · 2015 · PMC4413654
highly significantP < 0.00040.0× alphaqualifiedgold
failed to achieve significanceP = 0.0521.0× alphaplainly factual
Bonferroni-corrected post hoc paired T -tests revealed a highly significant difference between fluent and nonfluent ABM sequences for body stimuli ( t (23) = 6.3, P < 0.0004), but the corresponding difference for nonbody stimuli just failed to achieve significance ( t (23) = 2.7, P = 0.052).
highly significantp -value = 0.00040.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Indeed, ABA3 expression kinetics obtained after infection by prtE and outC are not significantly or weakly significantly different from that obtained after buffer inoculation ( p -value = 0.0830 and 0.0411, respectively) in contrast to the highly significant differences between the WT strain ( p -value = 0.0004) or the hrcC mutant ( p -value = 0.0006) and the buffer ( Figure 3 and Supplementary Table S2 ).
highly significantp = 0.00040.0× alphaqualifiedgold
of borderline significancep = 0.030.6× alpha
When analysed separately, there was a highly significant association between haemoglobin and serum ferritin in patients with ID ( r = 0.16, p = 0.0004), whereas in patients without ID, this association was only of borderline significance ( r = −0.09, p = 0.03).
highly significantP = 0.00040.0× alphaqualifiedgold
There was no difference in the slopes ( P = 0.58), but the difference in elevation was highly significant ( P = 0.0004), indicating that WT and M/Mt-CK −/− hearts do not share the same relationship for d P /d t max versus heart rate, but instead run in parallel (i.e. for any given heart rate, d P /d t max is lower in M/Mt-CK −/− hearts).