“highly significant”

The joint test statistic is highly significant ( P =0.0004), more so in fact than either of its components.

These differences were statistically highly significant (Figure 4 A, t = -3.59, P = 0.0004; Figure 4 B, t = -2.59, P = 0.01; see “seedling survival”).

This level of overlapping is highly significant ( P = 4E-4, χ 2 test).

In temporal GM, the overall association between normalised S1P level and Braak stage was highly significant (p = 0.0004).

The differences were statistically highly significant ( P = 0.0004).

However, since significant terms were highly significant ( p <0.0004 in all cases) and non-significant terms were highly non-significant ( p >0.1259 in all cases), there is no ambiguity in the results.

This difference is highly significant (p<.0004, Fisher’s exact test, two-tailed); furthermore, the sole novel nonsynonymous variant detected in an African-American POAG case ( Table 3 ) was not predicted to be pathogenic.

The sexual difference was highly significant (P=0.0004, by one-way ANOVA).

Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a highly significant difference in MFS between the two classes ( P = 0.0004).

Differences in patient satisfaction between women having answered this question with “yes” or with “no” are highly significant ( P < .0004).

The difference in the two distributions is highly significant (Fisher's exact test, P = 4×10 −4 ), suggesting that ethnic differences contribute to the bimodal distribution of imputation quality seen in Figure S12 .

In contrast, males displayed a more substantial and highly significant weight difference, with AL males weighing 9.9 ± 0.73 g versus 4.18 ± 0.24 g for CR males (Dunn‐test, adj. p < 0.0004, Figure 1A and Figure S1B ).

Conversely, when only products containing 50% or more nuts and seeds were evaluated, the changes in score when compared with the original HSR scores were highly significant for all scenarios ( p value = 0.0004, 0.0013 and 0.0098 for scenarios S1, S2 and S3, respectively).

RecG is expressed at a low level in “ BLM- FC: RecG fuse” cells (Figure 3 B, Table 1 ), resulting in a less dramatic, 25% reduction in the elevated SCE phenotype, nevertheless in a statistically highly significant manner (P=0.0004, Mann–Whitney two-tailed test).

It was observed that only MWW haplotypes showed a highly significant ( p = 0.0004) reduction (>50%) in the expression of the luciferase reporter gene ( Fig. 2 ).

There was no difference in the slopes ( P = 0.58), but the difference in elevation was highly significant ( P = 0.0004), indicating that WT and M/Mt-CK −/− hearts do not share the same relationship for d P /d t max versus heart rate, but instead run in parallel (i.e. for any given heart rate, d P /d t max is lower in M/Mt-CK −/− hearts).

In the final training session, she spent an average of 23 ± 3 s to complete each drawing, which is a highly significant improvement over the first training session ( p < 0.0004; t = 4.32; df = 19).

This difference was highly significant ( P = 0.0004); the average distributions were 64% ±17 gametocytes in the BM and 8% ±9 gametocytes in the PB (Fig. 3b ).

In contrast, there was a highly significant inverse correlation in SLE patients ( r = -0.587, P = 0.0004), such that low activation status was linked with higher IMT score.

At the end of 12 weeks, there was a highly significant ( P = 0.0004) 20 m placebo-corrected median improvement in 6MWD.

This highly significant difference in self-renewal pattern (p < 0.0004; two-tailed Fisher's exact test) is consistent with nuclear Lgr5 marking HF-SCs that shift between symmetric self-renewal and asymmetric self-renewal in response to Xn.

This would be consistent with the finding in the same study of highly significant correlations between tryptophan levels in the blood and disease severity as indicated by the number of CAG motif repeats (negative correlation, p = 0.0004), and between the kynurenine:tryptophan ratio and CAG repeat length (positive correlation, p = 0.0025). 16 In neither of these two patient groups is there any available pharmacological strategy for significantly improving the long-term outcome of the brain injury or neurodegeneration, so therapeutic studies to assess responses to drug therapies as performed in osteoporosis patients (above) are not currently possible.

This finding was not anticipated prior to the study, and the difference between the HFA and control groups was highly significant ( p <0.0004).

This increase was highly significant ( p = 0.0004, Fisher's exact test) ( Table 1 ).

Using a paired Student's t-test, the difference is highly significant (p = 0.0004).