The result of the Friedman’s test was highly significant ( P =0.0005).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
For all tumors, there was a highly significant association between the Immunotype Score and the expression of PTPRC (r = 0.32, p = 0.0005, Fig. 2 A, Table 1 ).
Faroese smokers tended to have higher T than non-smokers (p=0.7, adjusted for BMI effect), whereas the effect on the Danish men were highly significant (p<0.0005).
Serum MDA levels were found to be higher (6.846 ± 1.5) than controls (4.588 ± 1.17) while SOD levels were found to be lower in women with miscarriage (2.26 ± 0.66) than that of control group (3.16 ± 1.13) and difference were found to be highly significant ( P = 0.0005, <0.0001), respectively.
In contrast, PMA triggered a much larger increase in the C/N ratio of eERK-KTR1.2/emiRFP670, from ∼0.7 to ∼1.7, which was highly significant ( p = 5 × 10 −4 ).
In the 1-h period before tetanization, there were no overall differences in mean fEPSP slope values elicited by stimulation of left versus right CA3 [ipsilateral Schaffer collateral: left CA3 = −1.09 ± 0.13 mV/ms; right CA3 = −1.18 ± 0.10 mV/ms; contralateral commissural: left CA3 = −0.76 ± 0.06 mV/ms; right CA3 = −0.72 ± 0.09 mV/ms; overall left versus right comparison: F (1,74) = 0.07; p = 0.79], but a highly significant difference between the fEPSP slopes elicited by contralateral (crossed) versus ipsilateral (uncrossed) CA3 stimulation [ F (1,74) = 15.3; p < 0.0005].
Benefit For this case, the global Pearson’s chi-squared values were highly significant ( x 2 = 23430.50, df = 16; p < 0.0005).
In all cases the change in β was highly significant (p < 0.0005).
3C , and revealed highly significant changes as a function of gestational age (p < 0.0005) and mouse model (p < 0.0005).
The results of this comparison, shown in Figure 3 , indicate a highly significant correlation (lesions per base: model = 0.9006 × [ΔΔ C t ] + 0.73; r = 0.89, P < 0.0005).
1b ) with a 2 × 2 ANOVA showing highly significant effect of LB ( F [1,63] = 14.9, p < 0.0005), with no effect of sex ( F [1,63] = 0.18, p = 0.67), or interaction ( F [1,63] = 0.43, p = 0.52).
This is statistically highly significant (p < 0.0005) when comparing the group of hospitals with designated baby-friendly status in the past five years with those hospitals that had not been re-assessed for baby-friendliness in the past five years and with those that had never received baby-friendly status.
Using a randomization approach (see Materials and Methods), we find that both the excess of non-synonymous mutations, and the paucity of synonymous mutations, are highly significant ( Figure S4 ; P <0.0005).
However, the difference between the last postrace concentrations after Saturday finals and the non-race concentrations on Sunday afternoon (the latter five data points showed no significant change over time (as to be expected, see figure 1B )) were highly significant (p =<0.0005).
However, when these SNPs were combined into a risk score, a highly significant association ( p = 0.0005) was found.
We thus fitted the additive model, and, in this model, the method of density estimation was not significant (p = 0.1266) while the effect of the log.BodyMass was highly significant (p = 0.0005, conditional R 2 = 0.90).
Similarly, carotenoid content (CAR) exhibited a highly significant positive correlation with biological yield (BY) (r = 0.8447, p = 0.0005*) and TGW (r = 0.7378, p = 0.0062*).
Differences in the LARS score among QoL categories were highly significant ( p < 0.0005) ( Figure 2 ).
A P -value < 0.05 (*) was considered statistically significant, P < 0.005 (**) was considered highly significant, and P < 0.0005 (***) was considered extremely significant.
The difference was highly significant (Fisher’s Exact Test, p = 0.0005).
The correlations between “behavioral apathy” scores and signal change as P (yes) increased were still highly significant after controlling for individuals akaike information criterion (partial correlations, SMA: r = 0.562, P < 0.0005; ccz: r = 0.555, P < 0.0005; and M1: r = 0.489, P = 0.002).
A very strong and highly significant association of the biomarkers with the Average Change of the PGI-R was found (adjusted R2 = 0.61, p < 0.0005), with the most significant biomarkers being vitamin K (p = 0.03) and Biotin (p = 0.04).
Overall, we found a highly significant negative relationship between competitive success and yield in monoculture (linear regression; F 1,18 =27.117, R 2 =0.601, P <0.0005; Fig. 4b ).
Considering the influence of drinking water source, reduction in Campylobacter occurrence for using tube-well water in comparison to river water was observed to be highly significant (p < 0.0005) in cloacal swab samples and significant (p < 0.005) in egg surface swab and drinking water samples but insignificant for soil samples (Fig. 4 B).
We found a highly significant relationship between antidepressant use and eclampsia, OR 2.84 ( p < 0.0005, CI 2.06 – 3.92), unchanged when compared with the depressed/anxious cohort: OR 2.84 ( p < 0.0005, CI 2.06 – 3.92).