“highly significant”

Follow up analyses that analyzed each extraction type separately showed that the trilinguals' L1 Cantonese subject RC scores positively predicted their L3 Mandarin subject RC scores and the result was highly significant (β = 0.78, t = 5.81, p < 0.001), while the trilinguals' Cantonese object RC scores did not predict their Mandarin object RC scores (β = 0.32, t = 1.54, p = 0.14, n.s .).

Regression analysis indicated that the laser treatment had no significant effect on the microleakage scores, while the effect of the material type and the margin location was highly significant ( P ≤ 0.001) ( Table 4 ). 4.

Table 2 shows Paired ‘t’ test showed significant difference in overall pre and posttest mean scores of knowledge (10.45 ± 2.88 and 23.85 ± 0.44, resulting in amean difference of 13.4, calculated ‘t’ value =50.18 higher than the table value 3.291), highly significant at P < 0.001 level.

Owing to the high number of symptoms present, for the a priori variable selection, those demonstrating a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) via Fisher’s exact test were used for the development of our model.

There was also a highly significant difference between different income classification of countries ( P < 0.001), with a longer median length of excretion for high-income countries (2.5 years, 95% CI: 1.3–3.7) than upper-middle income countries (1.0 year, 95% CI: 0.9–1.3), lower-middle income countries (1.0 years, 95% CI: 0.8–1.5), and low-income countries (0.8 years) (Figure 3 C).

The categorical analysis of soluble protein was highly significant in stress types ( p = 0.001), study types ( p = 0.001), and maize varieties ( p = 0.02).

Reasons for Non-Participation from the Employees’ Point of View A KMO value of 0.65 and highly significant Bartlett test ( p < 0.001) confirmed that an EFA can be performed.

Overall, the most relevant parameters explaining LULC in the region were the topographic driver grouping (which incorporates elevation and slope), this driver grouping was highly significant for the majority of the transitions studied (p<0.001, Table 3 ), with the exception of the shrub and herb loss.

Among these, length and SA showed a highly significant positive correlation (r = 0.94, p < 0.001) with each other.

A highly significant intraobserver correlation (r=0.983, P<0.001) was found for repetitive measurements, as was the case for interobserver variability (r=0.973, P<0.001) between the photographs.

The difference was highly significant (P<0.001).

The results showed that the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin value was always above 0.50, that Bartlett’s test of sphericity was highly significant ( p < 0.001) and that the amount of variance explained by the single factor was always substantial, ranging from 36% to 62%.

However, comparing all measured saliva to serum concentrations ( n = 33) led to a highly significant correlation between clinical saliva and serum values (Pearson correlation r = 0.72, p < 0.001, y = −6.39 x + 1.36, R 2 = 0.52) as shown in Figure 1 A.

For 2D 1 H MRS and ProFit, ANOVA-RM analysis revealed highly significant changes for POC GABA levels in the CPP-115 cohort ( F 3,9 = 20.5, p < 0.001), but not for placebo ( F 3,3 = 1.5, p = 0.4).

Correlations between resilience, requiring factors of the work, overall job satisfaction, intention to leave nursing, and quality of care Highly significant correlations were found between resilience, requiring factors of the work, overall job satisfaction, intention to leave nursing, and quality of care (p ≤ .001) (Table 3 ).

The variant rs75932628 confers a substantially higher risk of late-onset Alzheimer’s disease, and, in one study, the odds ratio was 2.9 [ 150 ] ( Table 2 ); in another study, which comprised 1887 patients with Alzheimer’s disease, a strong, highly significant association (OR: 5.05, 95% CI: 2.77–9.16; p < 0.001) was observed [ 151 ] ( Table 2 ).

This test of association is highly significant with P = 0.001.

Our initial statistical analysis revealed a highly significant effect on total beam breaks with genotype for Macrod2 KO (* p = 0.001), but not Macrod1 KO ( p = 0.427) (see Supplementary Table S3 and Figure S3 ).

In addition, the presence of a cochlear implant champion at the hospital associated a highly significant benefit on having a discussion (OR: 1.42; [1.25, 1.61]; p < 0.001).

This result is supported by previously identified highly significant (p<0.001) positive additive (‘bb’) x additive (‘bb’) effects from a joint scaling test using the MRI x SB22 full-sibling family indicating the presence of homozygous loci with an increase in susceptibility [ 19 ].

There was a highly significant difference in periodical medical check-ups between CFHs and HCFHs ( p < 0.001).

Significance levels were classified as highly significant ( P < 0.001), strongly significant ( P < 0.01), significant ( P < 0.05), and tendency ( P < 0.1.).

The Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure of sampling adequacy was 0.944, which is above the recommended value of 0.60, and the Bartlett’s test of sphericity was found to be highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed highly significant effects ( p ≤ 0.001) of irrigation regimes for most of the traits ( Table S7 ), except spike length (SpL) and flag leaf length (FLL) (0.01 ≤ p ≤ 0.05).

Egger's test was highly significant (p < 0.001), implying evidence of publication bias (Figure 4 ).