“highly significant”

However, since the association between serological clusters and disease severity remained highly significant (P < 0.001) after excluding data from the 2008 samples, this confounding was not responsible for the association, as might be the case, for example, if the frequency of severe malaria-causing genotypes in the population changed from year to year.

These represent relative reductions of approximately 30 % (IR) and 34.8 % (XR) from baseline, each highly significant (Wilcoxon, p < 0.001 within groups) ( Table 6 , Table 7 ).

All pairwise comparisons of contact corners and contact region songs and syllables were highly significant (p < 0.001, Tables 2c and 3c ), showing that USVs emitted in the two social regions differed strongly in all measured parameters ( Fig 4b ).

The concordance between monogenoid phylogeny and ariid shape (host interaction) was higher ( R 2 = 0.30) and highly significant ( P = 0.001) ( Fig. 3D ).

In all the above tests, P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant; P > 0.05 was taken to be statistically not significant; P < 0.01 was taken to be statistically highly significant and P < 0.001 as very highly significant.

The Closeness rate was related to the type of human-robot interactions with a highly significant increase of IOS score in Correlated as compared to Static state (p < 0.001).

Comparison between months for both variables confirmed highly significant differences (pairwise comparisons – Benjamini-Hochberg adjustment: all P <0.001).

“mavizˮ consumption produced a highly significant improvement in total working memory score in the Digit Span Task (5.18 vs. 2.35, p<0.001) and Acoustic Memory Span (1.29 vs. 0.62, p=0.021).

When members of the Felidae family were removed, this phylogenetic signal remained highly significant ( λ = 0.90, logL = −13.4, p <0.001).

Correlation was considered to be significant with p < 0.05 and highly significant with p ≤ 0.001.

As there was increase in the duration of diabetes, the PN was shown to be increased, and it is statistically highly significant with the P < 0.001 with the odds ratio of 0.23 (95% CI 0.13–0.39).

This observation was highly significant compared to the expected number of interactions with neighboring genes in a randomized network that preserves node degrees ( P < 0.001; empiric P -value).

We make note of this result even though it exceeds our 0.005 cutoff because the main effect for Asian individuals compared to White individuals was highly significant (AOR = 0.10, p < 0.001).

test of the statistical significance of the allele frequency divergence between the two populations, were highly significant (p < 0.001).

All treatment groups prolonged survival time significantly compared to the negative controls, with the standard exhibiting a highly significant prolongation ( p < 0.001) than the extract (Table 5 ).

With a large sample size (n = 500), the p-value for the difference between the experimental and control groups was highly significant (p < 0.001), suggesting that meditation reduced anxiety.

Three results were highly significant (p-value<0.001) but there nevertheless is a risk of Type I errors.

Increased sunniness had a highly significant effect on the rate of bumblebees reported (P<0.001; Fig 3C ); with an almost doubling for counts taking place in full sun compared to counts taking place during no sun.

Log of likelihood ratio contrasted by the χ 2 test demonstrated that the model was highly significant (χ 2 = 21.02; degrees of freedom [df] = 4; P < 0.001).

The expression level of one gene, oxysterol binding protein-like 11 (OSBPL11), was revealed to be lower in HCC tissues compared with adjacent tissues in all 10 samples; this difference was identified to be significant in nine of the samples, and the difference between the HCT and AT groups reached a highly significant level (P<0.001; Table SIII ).

Highly significant (at P < 0.001) Pearson’s correlation coefficients between IR, DS, and COI across four environments showed positive correlations ( Supplementary Table S6 and Figure 3B ).

The results of the MANOVA ( Table 1 ) showed a highly significant effect of the interaction variety × fruit ripening ( p < 0.001) on the three sets of variables.

There is a highly significant positive relationship between the rate of adaptation and the recombination rate (Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient ρ s = 0.64, P < 0.001).

These degenerative changes were marked by highly significant ( p < 0.001) decrease in tubular and luminal diameters of seminiferous tubule and epithelial height among bisphenols treated groups as compared to control.

Differences were considered significant at p < .05 and highly significant at p < .001.