“highly significant”

Results Synchrony versus Pseudosynchrony The comparison of genuine synchrony to pseudosynchrony indicated that the phenomenon of nonverbal synchrony was present at a highly significant level and with a medium to high effect-size ( t = 4.91, p < .001, Cohen's d = 0.7, n = 27).

However, a highly significant effect of Valence was found for Bias [ F (1,35) = 29.11, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.45], with significantly higher bias for negative words, and also a main effect of Genotype [ F (1,35) = 6.56, p = 0.02, η p 2 = 0.16], with significantly lower bias in Met carriers than Val homozygotes (see Figure 1 ).

The difference between error and correct responses was highly significant ( p < .001) for both ERP components at each of the three time points. 3.2 Effects of demographic covariates on ERN The linear mixed-effect model showed no significant effect of gender on the ERN amplitude ( p > .1), however, the effect of ethnicity was significant ( F (1,408.1) = 9.07, p < .01), indicating larger ERN amplitude in Caucasians relative to minorities.

ANOVA results indicated that the effects of G, E and G × E were all highly significant ( P < 0.001) except for the effect of E on panicle number ( P < 0.05; Table 2 ).

A highly significant increase in antineuropathic prescription during the pandemic was also found for Cohort II patients, with IRR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.08–1.14, p < 0.001, while decreased prescriptions were found for weak opioids, with IRR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.95–0.99, p = 0.025 for Cohort I patients and IRR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.93–0.98, p = 0.003 for Cohort II patients (Table 3).

However, if the opposite was true and they were high F&V consumers with low fertilization rates, it is unlikely that their outcomes would influence the highly significant correlation observed in our analysis (β = 0.034, p < 0.001) (Table 2 ).

Although the former variability is assumed to be known and estimated by the standard error reported for each study, the latter (heterogeneity) was estimated from the model and found to be highly significant [ Q = 308.14 (14 df), p < 0.001].

There was a highly significant difference in Breg cells between SLE and APS patients with subclinical atherosclerosis and controls (P= 0.001, 0.005).

There was a highly significant interaction between season and tick species (z = 3.73, p < 0.001, Fig. 2 ) .

With both interventions, we observed highly significant ( P < 0.001) improvements with large effect sizes (>0.8) for symptoms and condition-specific quality of life (QoL) after 1 and 2 years, respectively.

Hence, adopting the total oocyte number from PVO4b to VTO as our proxy for potential fecundity, the relationship with body size (TL) was positive and highly significant (GLM, P < 0.001; Fig. 5A ), while no differences among spawning seasons was observed (GLM, P = 0.76).

On comparison of hs-CRP levels in grade 2 and grade 3, the difference was highly significant with P < 0.001.

A multivariate analysis through a linear mixed effects model (see Methods) reveals highly significant ( p − values < 0.001) correlations between FSLE, the QPI and the rate of attempted prey capture (see Table SI1 ).

A large analysis of T1 colorectal carcinomas in 2002 (n=7543) found that lesions with deep submucosal invasion (sm3) were associated with a highly significant risk of lymph node metastases (p<0.001). 64 This histological information is therefore vital in establishing whether a patient has been cured, the risk of recurrence and planning of subsequent treatment.

In the follow-up, each group showed significant deterioration in DLA and cognition at 3 and 12 months, demonstrated by the highly significant values of the binomial test ( p <<0.001 for all variables and groups).

We found 558 contigs with highly significant correlations (p < 0.001); 206 of these were positively correlated, while the remaining 352 were negatively correlated ( Supplementary Table S3 ).

For the entire dataset, quartiles were: Q25 = 0.32, Q50 = 0.37, and Q75 = 0.44, but the within breed values ( Table 2 .) are much more informative because breed differences are highly significant (F 2,9200 = 930.1, P<0.001).

In contrast, creatine exhibited a highly significant negative association with effectiveness (B= −0.485, β = −0.193, p = 0.001).

This model was highly significant, F (2, 38) = 107.626, p < 0.001, accounting for 85% of the variance (R2 = 0.850).

rural) shows a weaker association ( p = 0.059), education level is highly significant, with illiterate individuals having the highest rate of sleep disturbances (76.2%, p < 0.001).

In this regard, an analysis of polar phospholipids using TLC showed a highly significant decrease ( P < 0.001) in the concentrations of the anionic phospholipids phosphatidylserine, phosphatidylinositol, and phosphatidylethanolamine in eyes with MGD.

2 - black circle’s departure from the diagonal) was also highly significant (p < 0.001).

This model confirms that the effect of body mass depends on season, where the curvature in early season is highly significant (GAM; edf = 3.999, Ref. df. = 5.008, F = 5.600, P = 0.001, Fig 6 ), while it is non-significant in the late season (GAM; edf = 0.667, Ref. df. = 0.667, F = 0.515, P = 0.558, Fig 6 ).

Further, highly significant decrease was noted with administration of high-dose artesunate ( P < .001) in GSH, G-Px, and G-Rx after 45 days of treatment.

A value of p<0.05 was considered significant, p<0.01 as highly significant and p<0.001 very highly significant.