Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp<<0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The relation between the expected cation exchange capacity (CEC) of the soil at a tree ́s growth site and estimated seed production was not significant according to our GLMM, but nonetheless yielded a highly significant positive Spearman correlation coefficient (p<<0.001; S2 Fig ).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Higher and comparable percentage of wound contraction on excision wound healing model was observed in groups treated with 5%, 10% w/w hydromethanolic crude extract of Bersama abyssinica leaves and nitrofurazone 0.2% w/v at 12 th (90.58%, 93.73%, and 94.18%), 14 th (99.29%, 99.35%, and 97.05%), and 16 th (99.55%, 100%, and 100%) postwounding days, respectively, and was highly significant ( p < 0.001) compared with negative control.
highly significantp ≤ 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A 10 μg/m 3 increase in PM decreased RMSSD by 98% (95% CI: − 1.62, − 0.33), 64% (95% CI: − 1.28, − 0.01), 62% (95% CI: − 0.94,-0.29) and 59% (95% CI: − 0.96, 0.21) among e-waste collectors, sorters, dismantlers and burners respectively and these associations were highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001; p ≤ 0.001; p = 0.05; p ≤ 0.001).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Dividing obese females according to the presence of visceral fat; it was found that visceral obese status was associated significantly with the presence of the heterozygous (CT) genotype of the XbaI Apo B gene; as females carrying (CT) heterozygous represented; 22 out of 56 visceral obese (39.3%), 6 out of 66 (9.1%) obese without visceral fat and 8 out of 36 (22.2%) normal weight subjects; with highly significant differences ( p < 0.001).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Two items had strong loadings on care quality at the admission stage (i.e., their coefficients were highly significant): the provider encourages the companion to assist the delivery ( β = 0.62; p < 0.001) and the provider measures the woman’s temperature ( β = 0.66; p < 0.001).
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The bivariate analysis shows a highly significant difference ( P < 0.001) between the prevalence of the prehypertension/hypertension groups according to the categories of a) sex mainly due to the high prevalence of prehypertension in men (43.2%) and hypertension in women (34.2%), b) locality which is related to the significantly high proportion of