“highly significant”

We find that round is highly significant, regardless of the control variables being added or not (t = -0.064; p<0.001), suggesting a systematic reduction in effort (i.e., an increase in efficiency) over the repetition of the scenarios.

There is a highly significant difference in NCC MERP ratings between the subgroups ( p < 0.001) with a more than threefold higher proportion of C errors in PD-CP group.

Results showed that there was a highly significant effect of mean between with and without mask condition [t(34) = -10, p < 0.001].

We found a strong and highly significant correlation between UCPs and plasma C-peptides for DPZ animals (r s = 0.845, p<0.001, Figure 1e ), but not CS animals (r s = 0.390, p = 0.093, Figure 1f ).

There was a very strong positive correlation between two models (r = 0.94) in all men and also in men < 60 years (r = 0.84) and men ≥ 60 years old (r = 0.94) with a highly significant P -value ( P < 0.001).

In patients with aggressive DAVF (Cognard 2B and above), the change was highly significant ( p < 0.001; q = 0.001).

Linkage disequilibrium, non‐random association among pairs of loci due to lack of recombination, within clone‐corrected haplotypes of these two populations was highly significant ( P < 0.001, in both cases; Table 3 ).

Conversely, intakes of other forms of vitamin E ( γ-tocopherol, δ-tocopherol, γ-tocotrienol and δ-tocotrienol) suggest a highly significant inverse trend between serum concentration of vitamin E and cancer risk ( P < 0.001)[ 30 , 47 ].

There were highly significant differences between treatment doses for tumor burden and hypoxia ( P < 0.001).

The interaction between the regional location and the dietary treatment was highly significant ( p < 0.001) for a*, b*, Ch*, and H o , and significant for L* ( p < 0.05).

Keywords: Amyloid Neuropathies, Familial Amyloidosis, Familial Acidosis, Renal Tubular Prealbumin Urinalysis Furthermore, we obtained a highly significant correlation between dipstick UpH and UpH potentiometry (Spearman’s Rho 0.797, p<0.001), as shown by the regression line in Figure 2 .

The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin statistic was 0.957 and Bartlett’s test was highly significant (p<0.001), indicating that the PCA was deemed appropriate for the data.

For type 13, we found highly significant selection ( P <0.001) in landraces of Indonesia and the Philippines, especially in japonica rice.

Food Plant Preference 24 h after LCA Damage Determination of food plant preferences revealed a highly significant response that strongly depended on the different treatments applied ( Fig. 1B ; univariate ANOVA: F 4, 103 = 10.065, P<0.001), while colony identity did not affect the model (‘ant colony’ as random factor, univariate ANOVA: F 2, 103 = 0.315, P>0.05).

Linear regression using path analysis was conducted to study the predictors of academic achievement, and it revealed that motivation was the highly significant predictor of academic achievement (β = 2.68, CI95%:2.35–3.05, P < 0.001), followed by learning (β = 1.09, CI95%:0.80–1.41, P < 0.001), emotional intelligence (β = 0.92, CI95%:0.87–0.97, P < 0.001), and the educational environment (β = 0.14, CI95%:0.13–0.15, P < 0.001).

Correlation analysis of MMP-9/BDNF ratio with parameters of interest for the clinical assessment of the disease severity ( Table 4 ) revealed its negative correlation with IL-10/IL-17 ratio in moderately ill patients (p<0.05) and highly significant positive correlation with MMP-8 in mild (I), moderate (II) and IV (critical) groups (p<0.001).

Most interestingly, we found a highly significant interaction between group membership and SCC on measures of perceived cognitive abilities – CogPCA [ F (1) = 14.84, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.05], cognitive functionality on quality of life - CogQoL [ F (1) = 9.90, p < 0.01, η 2 = 0.04], and cognitive difficulties referred by others – CogOTH [ F (1) = 21.95, p < 0.01, η 2 = 0.03].

The calculated value of t = 14.548 and t = 8.601 was statistically highly significant at a p < .001 level ( Table 3 ).

We deemed predictors as promising if they were not amenable to meta-analysis but single studies reported a highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001) and large association (OR ≥ 2.0 or OR ≤ 0.5) with a study population of at least 1000 patients. 34 To avoid overestimating associations, we imputed an OR of 1 for predictors that were excluded in adjusted analyses because of nonsignificance. 34 , 35 We calculated the absolute risk for each predictor amenable to meta-analysis to facilitate interpretation using baseline risks of 1 in 1000 23 for fatal overdose and 2 in 1000 24 for nonfatal overdose.

Differences were considered significant when p ≤ 0.05 (*) or highly significant when p ≤ 0.001 (**).

The TSK-11 has good test-retest reliability (ICC (95% CI) 0.81 (0.71 to 0.88)) and a highly significant correlation with change scores on the TSK (r = 0.93, P < .001) [ 18 , 19 ].

Non-parametric comparison of the distributions showed highly significant differences (p < 0.001).

Diclofenac, a potent analgesic compound, produced highly significant ( P < 0.001) effect on writhing in doses of 1 mg/kg, i.p.

Regression identified Head–neck Connection, Quality of Legs, Walk length of Stride, and Scope as highly significant predictors of sales price ( p < 0.001), with Length of Croup, Trot Elasticity, Trot Balance, and Take-off Direction also significant ( p < 0.05).

The difference in mean changes between groups from EVA 1 to EVA 3 was highly significant ( p < 0.001), underscoring the intervention's effectiveness in reducing dynamic pain.