“highly significant”

Clonidine at doses of 37.5 μ g/kg and 65 μ g/kg induced a highly significant [ F ANOVA (3, 20) = 90.46; P < 0.001] decrease in the mean hind limb withdrawal time (Fig. 2 ).

Across all surveys, significantly more species (summed species occurrences at each island) were recorded at Darwin and Wolf than at all other sites (ANOVA, F = 80.4, df : 11,25, p < 0.001; differences between Darwin and all islands, except Wolf, highly significant, p < 0.001; see Table SI- 2 for listing of species, Table SI- 3 for the ANOVA table).

Statistical comparisons between receptor subgroups and menopausal status, tumor grade, lymphatic invasion, lymph nodes, adjuvant chemotherapy drugs and pathological stage were highly significant (p-values < 0.001).

A moderately positive correlation between the potential to ask further questions and satisfaction with the informed consent was identified through non-parametric correlation analysis, which was highly significant (p = 0.001).

Statistical significance was considered at P < 0.05 and highly significant at P < 0.001.

The Cobb angle average was 41.1 ± 8.90 degrees in the NHG and 34.4 ± 6.70 degrees in the CG; the difference between them was highly significant ( p <0.001).

There was a highly significant group effect for EIM (F(12,130) = 44, p<0.001) and a similarly strongly significant group effect for CMAP (F (12,130) = 26, p<0.001) but a non-significant group effect for MUNE (F (12,130) = 0.31, p = 0.58,).

The SOD activity in 273 wheat materials exhibited highly significant differences among genotypes, environments, and their interactions ( P < 0.001), with a heritability of 0.81.

Overall, a highly significant (p<0.001) protective effect of the AG genotype of rs4656461 in the TMCO1 gene was observed for glaucoma ( Table 1 ).

In general, significant variations between the two varieties were found ( Table 4 ); the analysis of variance revealed highly significant differences ( p < 0.001).

Exposure to pravastatin was associated with the highest odds ratio for readmission (OR = 13.10; 95% CI (2.82, 60.8); P = 0.017;) and chlorpromazine was highly significant with moderate odds ratio (OR = 4.53; 95% CI (2.66, 7.37; P < 0.001).

Nevertheless, the comparison of the four-factor model with the more parsimonious three-factor structure yields similar results: a substantial χ 2 difference value of ~ 200 with only df = 3 restricted degrees of freedom, thus favouring the four-factor model in a highly significant way ( p < 0.001).

Paired samples t-tests revealed highly significant differences in MEP ( p = 0.001) and significant differences in FEV1/FVC ( p = 0.026) for the testosterone use and no testosterone use groups.

When DMFS was analyzed in the stage IIB-IIIA cohort specifically, results were highly significant for all three individual biomarkers as shown in Figure S5 ( P = .001, P = .017, and P = .001).

1 and 2 ) Taking into consideration the precise localization of the recurrent plaque, 41/41(100%) specimens were unilateral (compared to 30/41 (73.2%) in pVFL; the difference is highly significant: G (1) = 17.0, p < 0.001), but in 2/41 (4.9%) patients, the lesions spread in the anterior commissure (compared to 16/25 (39.0%) in pVFL, the difference is highly significant: G (1) = 15.5, p < 0.001).

The following variables that showed a highly significant statistical difference ( P <0.001) in the univariate analyses were entered a stepwise backward logistic regression model: age; Euroscore; preoperative plasma creatinine level; ScO2 minox ; type of surgery; duration of surgery; duration of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB); lowest hematocrit during CPB; intra- and postoperative use of inotropic/vasoactive agents (noradrenaline, dobutamine, vasopressine); cumulative use of blood products; mean RPP within the first 8 hours after ICU admission, time to first extubation (hours), and reintubation.

When comparing positions independently, the greatest group differences occurred in conditions P1 (eyes open and firm surface) and P3 (eyes closed and firm surface), both showing highly significant differences (p < 0.001) favoring the control group, with large effect sizes (d > 1.88) ( Figure 3 ).

The effect of group was highly significant, F (3, 65) = 15.75, p < .001, and explained over 40% of the variance in the composite variable, η p 2 = 0.42 (see Figure 1 ).

All the F ST values were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Highly significant differences (p<0.001) were identified in all patients recruited into ADVANCE and the PARTNER-B MM arm for a number of key cardiovascular endpoints including atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, Logistic EuroSCORE and the proportion of patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV HF.

The shape of the associations between height at age 6 years or adult height and all-cause mortality were nonlinear, as indicated by the highly significant height-squared terms in the regression models ( P < .001).

A highly significant main effect of task [ F (2,108) = 29.119, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.350] suggested that the retrieval of dissimilar pairs was more demanding than the retrieval of similar pairs and the DMS-task ( p < 0.001 for both pairwise comparisons, respectively).

Statistical significance levels were denoted as follows: ∗ for p < 0.05 (statistically significant), ∗∗ for p < 0.01 (highly significant), and ∗∗∗ for p < 0.001 (extremely significant). 3.

The results indicated a highly significant improvement in RT during physical exercise periods compared to the baseline test ( P < 0.001).

The value of the Wilks' lambda statistic for the first function was close to zero and highly significant (λ = 0.04; χ2 = 137.221; d.f. = 8; P<0.001).