Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp-value < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Highly significant community level differences were observed between Fraction (PERMANOVA p-value < 0.001), Collection (PERMANOVA p-value < 0.001) and feed (PERMANOVA p-value < 0.001) based on the Bray–Curtis distances while less significant changes were contributed by breed (PERMANOVA p-value = 0.037) (Table 1 ).
highly significantp <0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
RNA ISH results correlated positively with IHC results ( p <0.05, r S =0.625; figure 3 B; see also table 1 ), and correlation with microarray data was highly significant ( p <0.001, r S =0.861; figure 3 C). 10.1136/jclinpath-2016-203798.supp5 Supplementary file Discussion Here we report two methods for the detection of KCNJ3 in archived FFPE human breast cancer tissue.
highly significantp ≤ 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Table S2 presents the results of the two-way ANOVA, revealing a highly significant effect ( p ≤ 0.001) of temperature, salinity, and their interaction on mycelial growth across all F. pseudograminearum isolates.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The relationship between the test variables and the response variables (yield) was established using multiple regression analysis, resulting in the following secondary‐order polynomial equation: Y = − 56.61834 + 0.071432 X 1 + 0.81887 X 2 + 0.43497 X 3 + 115.5413 X 4 − 4.50 × 1.0 − 5 X 1 X 2 + 4.46 × 10 − 3 X 1 X 3 + 0.030250 X 1 X 4 − 7.74 × 10 − 3 X 2 X 3 + 0.27850 X 2 X 4 − 0.598 X 3 X 4 − 4.69 × 1.0 − 3 X 1 2 − 0.014878 X 2 2 − 5.88 × 1.0 − 4 X 3 2 − 74.4325 X 4 2 The analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the regression equation reveals that both linear and quadratic terms were highly significant ( p < 0.001) indicating the robustness of the model (Table 3 ).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Resolution of population structure and migration Pairwise F st estimates (Table 2 ) were highly significant ( p < 0.001) for all population comparisons, with the exception of the two Tanzanian sites (0.0007), and PNG with the Solomon Islands (0.0059).