“highly significant”

The mean dimensions of all parameters for ramus were higher in males and highly significant ( P < 0.001).

Statistical analysis revealed a highly significant interaction term and main effect of frequency ( P < 0.001) and a marginally significant overall effect of groups ( P = 0.05).

Comparison of fiducials on the anterior–posterior image The ANOVA on the shifts for the AP image showed there were highly significant differences between fiducials, both in the LR and SI directions ( P < 0.001, n = 9250) (Fig. 1 ).

Both tests revealed highly significant differences within the studies (p<0.001).

Observed guidelines deviations were highly significant ( P < .001).

The nomogram model was established using the N stage and the risk score since the risk score was highly significant ( p < 0.001) and the N stage was marginally significant ( p = 0.055) upon the multivariate Cox analysis.

For both model variants, the effect of contrast was highly significant ( p < 0.001), whereas the effect of luminance was non-significant ( p > 0.285).

Even though there was a slight overestimation in boys in some age groups and slight underestimation in girls in some groups, correlation analysis showed that there was a highly significant correlation between the chronological age and dental age for both boys ( r 2 = 0.96, P < 0.001) and girls ( r 2 = 0.98, P < 0.001).

The post-prandial BG levels showed the same effect; it was greater in G1 than in G2 ( P < 0.05; Table 2 ). BG level reduction in G2 sows did not show immediately; interaction group × day was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

6 c, which reports the highly significant correlation ( r = 0.853; p < 0.001) between the clinical score and the percentage of fibrosis of the sampled area in animals from all groups.

The overall model was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001) and demonstrated a substantial explanatory power, accounting for 38.7% of the total variance in 6‐month weight loss ( R 2 = 0.387).

This could be explained by the highly significant linear relationship (χ 2 = 130.73, p < 0.001) between SIMD and maternal age, with maternal age increasing as SIMD increased: SIMD 1 and SIMD 2 have more younger mothers with a pregnancy with DS (18%, 15%, respectively) compared to SIMD 4 and SIMD 5 (5% and 2%, respectively) ( Appendix 1 , Table S8 ).

The correlations were all highly significant ( p < 0.001).

However, at both the 11th grade and 12th grade timepoints, THC was a highly significant predictor (both p < 0.001).

The network achieved a highly significant object classification accuracy of 49.9% (chance level = 0.1%; P < 0.001, binomial test) on this dataset.

We also carried out a mixed-effects model with village as a random factor, and the relationship remained highly significant at p < 0.001.

In this study, the statistical significance was determined as P < 0.05, and the statistically highly significant was determined as P < 0.001 (less than one in a thousand chance of being wrong).

From baseline to 18 months, the mean change in SE was –0.45 ± 0.33 D in the combination group and –1.00 ± 0.39 D in the control group, with a highly significant between-group difference ( t = 7.12, P < .001).

The Procrustes ANOVA performed on the shape variables confirmed the groups clustering observed in the PCA and returned highly significant results (F 2,21 = 8.725; r 2 = 0.478; p -value = 0.001).

The difference was highly significant ( P < 0.001), while treating these diabetic rats in G3-G6 with the aqueous extracts of the leaves and seeds of fenugreek and buckthorn significantly ( P < 0.001) enhanced restoring these kidney function parameters almost to the typical levels. 3.6.

This prevalence of bilateral and unilateral impactions among study population was statistically highly significant ( χ 2 = 216.89, p < 0.001 HS).

This sensitivity difference was highly significant (Student’s t , p < 0.001).

In the within-group comparisons, both the inpatient group and outpatient group showed highly significant reductions in pain interference at T2–T4 compared to T1 (inpatient p ≤ 0.001, 0.001, 0.001 vs outpatient, all p ≤ 0.001).

Starting from day 5, zeolite demonstrated a highly significant stimulatory effect on the germination percentage ( p < 0.001).

At first presentation, serum creatinine >1.4 mg/dl was associated with highly significant worse renal survival (P <0.001), and nephrotic range proteinuria was associated with the worst renal outcome (p=0.006) (Figures 3 - 4 ).