“highly significant”

Similarly, the difference in postoperative rescue analgesia between the groups was highly significant ( P < 0.001) at the end of treatment and 1 st h and significant ( P = 0.006) at the 2 nd h, while the difference was not significant ( P > 0.05) at the 3 rd h.

TKA had a highly significant impact on extensor moment at 10° (2.3 Nm (SD 0.2), vs native, two-way RMANOVA p < 0.001, vs Bi-UKA p = 0.002), 20° (3.0 Nm (SD 0.2) 40% reduction vs native two-way RMANOVA p < 0.001, 38% reduction vs Bi-UKA, p < 0.001), and 30° (3.1 Nm (SD 0.1) vs native two-way RMANOVA p < 0.001, vs Bi-UKA p < 0.001).

Moreover, a study in Shanghai reported that MTB genome quantification by RT-PCR provides a good performance in distinguishing between sarcoidosis and TB with highly significant (P<0.001) accuracy using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

* P -values of 0.001 to 0.05 reflected statistically significant differences; ** P -values of 0.001 to <0.01 were considered highly significant; and *** P -values <0.001 reflected extremely significant differences.

The constrained variables explained 59% of variation in community dissimilarity and a PerMANOVA of the model found the constraints to be highly significant ( F =14.70, p <0.001) along with the individual terms DRP, NNN, and TP ( p =0.005 for each variable).

The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy was 0.87, and Bartlett’s test of sphericity was highly significant ( p < 0.001), indicating that the data were suitable for the analysis.

The concordance between two DE measurements was highly significant ( r = 0.972, P < 0.001; Figure 4A ).

T-test showed that Cohen’s d is 0.341, which exceeds the level of 0.2 and is highly significant ( t = 7.136, two-sided p < 0.001).

Pearson correlation analysis showed a highly significant correlation of r = 0.998 between CL CT and CL MRI ( p < 0.001).

There was a highly significant interaction between hypoxic stress and dietary taurine on the taurine content in gill tissue ( P = 0.001). 3.4 Gill morphology and oxidative damage As shown in Fig. 1 , under normoxia, the gill filaments of grass carp were arranged neatly, the structure of gill epithelial cells was complete, and the gill lamellae were evenly distributed, relaxed and smooth.

The difference between the groups in risk change was highly significant (p<0.001).

Finally, it should be noted that while the correlation between ‘general performance quality’ and ‘study grades/output’ was highly significant ( r = 0.709, p < 0.001), their correlations with ‘interactions with other students’ or ‘contact with teachers’ were not significant.

In patients with sepsis, creatinine was a highly significant marker of AKI ( p < 0.001), followed by endostatin ( p = 0.001).

According to the p -value, differences were considered as significant ( p < 0.05) or highly significant ( p < 0.001). 3.

Considering only treatment, the mice spent significantly less time in the area treated with TMT (52.1 ± 5.9 s) than in the untreated area (343 ± 13.8 s), and this difference was highly significant, F(1,17) = 393.90, p < 0.001.

The differences in DM disappearance were highly significant ( p < 0.001) between dietary treatments from day 10–18 where it was higher in the LCF litters.

Furthermore, the miR-26a mimic-transfected follicles showed highly significant upregulation of the expression of mmu-mir-26a as compared to the miR- non-targeted control group ( p < 0.001).

The dropping of Vra1 or Vra2 showed a highly significant reduction of the additive LOD (p<0.001 with F statistics).

resulted in a highly significant neuroprotective effect (742.3 ± 25.8 RGCs/mm 2 ; p < 0.001; table 1 , Fig. 2B, C ).

Analysis of variance showed that malting barley grown after non-malting barley crops gave very highly significant ( p < 0.001) grain and biomass yield increments than when malting barley was the preceding crop in these experimental sites (Tables 1 and 2 ).

However, when the patients were grouped into three categories based on individual values of PES (score<10, score>11<12, and scores>13 and <14) and were analyzed for changes within and between the groups, there was a significant difference statistically between and within the groups, with a greater number of patients with PES values of (scores >13 and <14) in the SST group, which was highly significant statistically at P <0.001.

A highly significant association emerged between years of experience and the choice of first-line drug regimen (p = 0.001).

Highly significant correlations were observed between the CTSI ( r = 0.926, P < 0.001), mCTSI ( r = 0.950, P < 0.001), and extrapancreatic necrosis volume ( r = 0.784, P < 0.001) imaging scores and the severity of pancreatitis estimated by the rAC (Figures 1 - 3 ), with mild, moderate, and severe disease indicated by values of 1, 2, and 3, respectively.

In the current study, it could be seen that the regression coefficients (A, D, A 2 , and C 2 ) exhibited a highly significant effect ( P < 0.001) and the regression coefficients (B, BC, and B 2 ) were significant effects ( P < 0.05).

The model had acceptable fit indices (Table 2 , 2ii ), and explained a relatively high proportion of total PTSD symptom variation (R 2 = 26%), which was due to the highly significant association between chronic stress load and PTSD symptoms (β = 0.51, p < 0.001) (see Supplementary Table S4 for further information on direct and indirect effects).