“highly significant”

Controlling for age in the model did not alter results, neuroticism and extraversion remaining highly significant (p < .001) predictors.

Berendsen et al 15 found highly significant ( P < 0.001) disagreement in the perceptions of written communication between specialists at a main campus and practitioners at remote sites.

The lower prevalence of parasitism in the naïve catfish treatment was highly significant (Generalised Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) with binomial error distribution, n = 509 host clutches; naïve vs. experienced catfish: z = 4.31, P < 0.001; naïve vs. highly experienced catfish: z = 3.60, P < 0.001), but the probability of parasitising cichlid clutches did not differ between experienced and highly experienced catfish ( z = 0.75, P = 0.452) (Supplementary Table 2 ).

Chi-square analysis confirmed a highly significant association between cytology category and HPV mRNA status (χ 2 = 1296.26, df = 4, p < 0.001). 3.5.2.

In the parsimonious model, Module effect remained highly significant (p<0.001), and Item also showed a significant main effect (p<0.001), indicating different average levels across items but no differences in their pattern of change.

There were highly significant differences in associated actions according to occupation ( p < 0.001) (see Table 3 ).

A highly significant difference was found between microbial communities in the Caspian and Mediterranean Seas ( p = 0.001, R 2 = 12.4%), indicating that Location explains a substantial portion of the variation observed.

Given that highly significant correlations ( r = .69, p < .001) and similar results for the bilateral putamen were found, we used the average rGMD of the bilateral putamen in subsequent analyses. 3.2.

A highly significant association was found among the GCS, CT results, and ONSD measurements (P<0.001).

The Kaplan-Meier analyses for DMFS as a function of the seven-gene signature showed highly significant differences between the high- and low-risk groups ( Figure 3B , P < 0.001 in the training set; P = 0.039 in the validation set).

The association between coronary risk and interaction between metabolic syndrome and NAFLD was highly significant ( p value < 0.001).

All sequential improvements are highly significant (p < 0.001, McNemar’s test), confirming that gains from class balancing, eGFR regression, and monotonicity enforcement are not due to chance.

Joint space analysis and condylar position The assessment of joint spaces showed a highly significant difference in the anterior space (AS) among the groups ( P < 0.001).

Raktamokshana was found highly significant ( P < 0.001) in improving forward flexion of lumbar joint, VAS, straight leg raising, Lasegue’s sign, ODI scale and Schober’s test measurement.

The length of the periods between throws in the eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions did not differ (Wilcoxon Z = 1.01, p =0.311) and correlated at highly significant level (Spearman R = 0.88, p < 0.001).

In this case, the proportion of attracted individuals was statistically higher than the control (< n -hexane) for all concentrations, demonstrating highly significant differences for the highest concentrations [i.e., 0.1% ( p < 0.001) and 1.0% ( p < 0.001)].

pylori leads to highly significant adhesion inhibition ( p < 0.001).

Egger’s regression test was highly significant for comparative risk studies ( p < 0.001), and the trim-and-fill method imputed 15 and 11 hypothetically missing studies for comparative risk and standardized ratio analyses, respectively.

Results from the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) in the US and Canada for Type 1 DM and the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) for Type 2 DM demonstrate highly significant reductions (DCCT, p<0.001; UKPDS, p = 0.009) in the incidence and progression of retinopathy in patients randomized to tight blood glucose control (HbA1c <7%).

Although Korea had a lower baseline rate, it experienced a highly significant reduction in presenteeism, dropping from 20.3% to 15.3% during the pandemic ( p < .001).

More than one-half of the participants had received TB health education (63.29%), and the majority of the participants did not know a person with TB (85.80%) ( Table 1 ). Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) Since the KMO value=0.890 > 0.50 and Bartlett’s test of sphericity was highly significant, the TSS met the requirements for EFA (χ 2 = 4865.045 and p -value < 0.001).

However, the protective effect of NEO400 clearly was the strongest: compared to post‐treatments with POH, LA, or Aloe vera, the greater difference made by NEO400 was highly significant ( p < 0.001; Figure 6 ).

The smallest discrepancy, though still highly significant ( p = 0.001), was between needs of and access to psychopharmacologic treatment. 3.4.

bourarachae , both the developmental temperature of females (G1) and the temperature during oviposition and offspring development (G2) had a highly significant effect on the sex ratio (χ 2 = 4.104, df = 3, p < 0.001; χ 2 = 4.950, df = 4, p < 0.001, respectively).

The AUC for all assessed indicators was statistically highly significant ( P < .001), indicating diagnostic utility (Fig. 2 ). 3.4.