“highly significant”

In addition, a highly significant association (p-value<0.001) is found between education level or previous experience and whether people seek information about MRI safety.

The heterogeneity test showed highly significant among 11 cities ( P value < 0.001).

The statistical analysis ( Table 1 ) confirms that the sex of the interaction partner is a highly significant ( p < 0.001) predictor of shifts in trust; the negative B -value indicates that male interaction partners induce a decrease in trust (in comparison to the anonymous setting), while female interaction partners induce an increase in trust, both in male and female participants.

In contrast, the mean TCTI ratio from ADC values was higher in the soft group (1.37 ± 0.10) compared to the hard group (1.16 ± 0.18), with a highly significant difference ( P < .001).

Table 3 shows that the linear regression analysis yielded a strong predictive model, with an R2 value of 0.46 and a highly significant p-value (p = 0.001).

In the main spatial training phase, the animals rapidly learned to locate and raise the platform in order to escape from the pool ( Figure 2 ), as indicated by the highly significant reduction in latencies over trials ( F [7.78, 412] = 30.4, p < 0.001).

P < 0.05 is set as statistically significant, P < 0.01 is set as highly significant and P < 0.001 is set as very highly significant.

Given the large number of isolate results included in the majority of analyses in this study, statistical analysis was not performed, as even subtle differences in percent resistance (<1%) to an antimicrobial agent for any time period or demographic parameters would be reported as highly significant ( P <0.001).

In three-vessel disease, however, the analysis revealed a consistent and highly significant survival benefit in the first 8 years with an HR of 0.76 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.84, p<0.001) in favour of bypass surgery with similar survival rates in the two treatment strategies after that time period.

The difference between the mean plasma concentration in NPC1 patients and controls was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

The IE% showed a highly significant difference among the UTC and treatment groups ( χ 2 =193.2–250.0, P <0.001), as well as among the doses on days 3, 7/14 ( χ 2 =10.4–18.9, P <0.01).

The coefficient for subject group was estimated at −0.78 ± 0.03 and was highly significant ( p < 0.001), indicating that Mechanical Turk subjects performed worse than lab subjects.

By comparing the network to the 1,000 randomized networks, we found that the matrices, coefficient clustering and mean shortest path for our protein network are highly significant (p < 0.001).

Here again, there are highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) between the slope for the combined strabismic group and the slope for the anisometropic group.

The P2 also showed highly significant linear contrasts for the intensity factor for both the seven regular ISI case (F (1,4) = 114, p < 0.001) and five irregular ISI case (F (1,4) = 111, p < 0.001).

Venous blood flow Peak venous velocity with NMES showed a highly significant ( P < .001) increase over baseline, both in the seated position and in the recumbent position (Figure 5 ).

All the 10 SNP markers were highly significant ( P < 0.001) at an FDR of 0.01.

Correlations between the lesion diameters measured on MG and histology or CESM and histology were highly significant ( p <0.001, Figure 4A, 4B ), with PCC larger for CESM and histology (PCC=0.83, Figure 4B ) than for MG and histology (PCC=0.64, Figure 4A ).

As shown in Figure 7D , a highly significant correlation between KRT-19 and G6PD ( P < 0.001) was found between these two molecules.

It was found that: (a) LHIP/RHIP connections that were significant in the best 5-source model remain the same in 6-source model (except one RIPC to RHIP connection that fell slightly below the significance threshold), (b) connections from LHIP to mPFC, LIPC and RIPC are significantly ( p < 0.01) stronger than the same connections from RHIP, (c) there is a very strong (0.44 Hz) and highly significant ( p < 0.001) connection from LHIP to RHIP and no connection in the opposite direction.

and the scaled IL8 term was highly significant in the multivariate model (HR = 1.087, 90% CI = 1.048–1.128 p < 0.001).

Regarding the association between intentions towards COVID 19 vaccination and attitudes towards vaccines, vaccine hesitancy had highly significant associations with intermediate mistrust level of vaccine benefit (p < .001), high worries about unforeseen effects (p < .001), intermediate concerns about commercial profiteering (p < .001), and intermediate preference of natural immunity (p < .001) ( Table 5 ).

Apart from deviating from a standard neutral model, some loci pairs (1813, 1955) had positive LD (D′) results with highly significant ( p < 0.001) χ 2 values of 19.7 and 12.7 among Homa Bay and Kisumu sequences, respectively ( Supplementary Table S1 ).

Student’s t -test or one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test was used for analysis, p < 0.05 (*) was considered significant, p < 0.01 (**) was considered highly significant, and p < 0.001 (***) was very highly significant.

In contrast, the mRNA-H group displayed a dramatic reduction in RNA levels, with rectal tissue and mesenteric lymph nodes showing highly significant decreases compared with PBS controls ( P < 0.001).