“highly significant”

The lymph node ratio (LNR) remained statistically a highly significant parameter regarding DFS ( p < 0.001, HR: 4.99, 95% CI: 2.52–9.90) and OS ( p < 0.001, HR: 5.42, 95% CI: 2.81–10.44) in multivariate analysis (Table 2 ).

A one-way repeated measures ANOVA on flanked performance revealed a highly significant main effect of contrast combination between the target and the flankers ( F 3,18 = 10.986, p < 0.001).

In general, cranial measurements were longer on average in females than in males ( Table 1 ), and we found highly significant differences between all pairs of species ( p < 0.001), except for the comparisons between M. coibensis — M. molossus , P. macrotis—M. temminckii , P. macrotis—S. bilineata , M. nigricans — M. riparius and M. nigricans — S. leptura ( p > 0.05) ( Table 3 ).

Serum HCY concentrations were notably elevated in the case group [median (IQR): 6.44 (3.3) μmol/L] compared to the control group [4.5 (3.0) μmol/L], with a highly significant difference ( P < 0.001) (Table 2 ).

The overlap between the DEG sets from the kindling and kainic acid models, while modest in absolute count ( n = 123), was highly significant compared to random expectation (Fig. 2 C; Z = 10.19, p < 0.001), indicating shared gene regulation across models.

All statistical tests were 2-sided, and p -values < 0.05 (*) were considered statistically significant, p < 0.01 (**) highly significant and p < 0.001 (***) extremely significant.

The difference between controls and AD was nearly 6 kg for normal HGS, which was highly significant (p < 0.001).

In the left hand columns of Table 3 representing the results for squeals, vocants, and growls the odds ratios show that the three protophones conformed to the first two predictions (protophones > cry in neutrality, protophones < cry in negativity) with highly significant odds ratios (ORs > 1 and p < 0.001).

Post hoc pairwise comparisons revealed that the rating differences between the two listener groups were highly significant for AS_early, β = −3.07, SE = 0.79, z = −3.87, p < 0.001, AS_late, β = −3.81, SE = 0.68, z = −5.6, p < 0.001, FS, β = −3.45, SE = 0.69, z = −5.07, p < 0.001, and WP, β = −3.21, SE = 0.76, z = −4.22, p < 0.001, again confirming that BIL raters were less likely than ML raters to judge the bilinguals’ L1 speech as non-native.

FHEI exhibited highly significant differences ( p < 0.001), with medial fractures differing from lateral, pertrochanteric, and subtrochanteric fractures.

There was a highly significant association between male gender hernia patients and post Modified Halsted operation complications (p < 0.001).

5 , A – C ), all selected ratios uniformly showed highly significant differences in the temporal region ( p < 0.001) (exception for 580/500 ratio: p < 0.005) but not in the frontal and occipital regions ( Fig. 6 , D – G ).

1 highlighted this dynamic transformation process, in which fermented, fruity, creamy, milky-off, and sour aromas exhibited highly significant differences ( p < 0.001), while musty aromas also reached a substantial level.

1 ) and showed a highly significant effect of diagnosis (corrected for multiple comparisons, F 2,158 = 16.5, p < 0.001, Supplementary Fig.

A 3×2 ANCOVA controlling for age, found a highly significant difference between patient groups [ F (2, 268) = 7.14, P = 0.001; see Table 2 ].

All remaining correlations were highly significant (false discovery rate corrected p < 0.001), and isolated nodes with degree = 0 were removed.

Association study by Statistical analysis Statistical analysis revealed highly significant ( p < 0.001) positive associations among biofilm formation, antibiotic resistance, and virulence gene ( invA ) prevalence in Salmonella isolates.

Seven genes (CAV2, CHFR, CYP26B1, FLJ20021, NR4A2, TGFBRAP1, and TNFSF9) showed highly significant differences (p < 0.001), with RPS4Y1 demonstrating strong significance (p < 0.01) (Fig. 5 a).

The one-way ANOVA was highly significant, F (3,623) = 141.78, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.41.

Among the conventional lipid parameters, HDL-C demonstrated a significant decreasing trend from T1 (1.43 ± 0.39 mmol/L) to SCH (1.29 ± 0.36 mmol/L), which remained highly significant after FDR correction (unadjusted p < 0.001, adjusted q = 0.004).

Linear regression analyses showed a significant effect of PEMF on positive fusion (P=0.003) and remained highly significant after adjusting for all individual risk factors (P<0.001).

For the high EF group, only the linear component was highly significant (p <.001, ηp2 = .81) and pairwise comparisons showed that, apart from levels 3 and 4 (p = .243), the difference in memory performance between all other pairs was significant (ps <.05).

The effect was even more pronounced in elderly patients, with highly significant deterioration of the radiological outcome measures for conventional implants compared to precontoured LCP (RRS (C) = 5.7 ± 1.6, RRS (LCP) = 8.2 ± .8, P < .001; MPTA (C) = 92.6 ± 4.2°, MPTA (LCP) = 89.2 ± 1.4°, P = .002).

The difference between the preperturbation step and the perturbed step was highly significant ( P <.001), underscoring the disruptive effect of the perturbation on dynamic stability.

Concerning the radiation burden between surgeries for AIS with the FH technique or IN, the data show a highly significant ( p < 0.001) increment for the mean DLP in one study (Urbanski et al.) and the mean ED available in three studies (Dabaghi-Richerand et al., Su et al., and Urbanski et al.) [ 24 , 26 , 27 ].