“highly significant”

We observed a highly significant additive effect of mental demands and education on better performance in the TMT-B and VFT (p < 0.001; see Table 4 ).

5c ), PM 2·5 demonstrated a strong and highly significant decrease with distance (β = −0.6345 μg m −3 per 100 m; 95% CI: −0.6989 to −0.5701; R 2 = 0.7919; r = −0.8899; p < 0.001), indicating a pronounced near-road effect.

Again, we obtained a highly significant difference in conspiracies total (12.6 versus 9.6, p < 0.001 , in the first survey; 11.6 versus 9.1, p < 0.001 , in the second survey).

As in previous cohorts, there was a highly significant increase in brain weight relative to body weight in Nf1 +/- mice compared to +/+ controls (Fig. 4G : main effects – Genotype: p < 0.001; Sex: p < 0.001).

Overall, 140 of 349 (40.1%) assigned hydroxychloroquine reported a side effect by day 5, as compared with 50 of 352 (16.8%) assigned placebo, a highly significant increase ( P < .001).

Large restaurants showed highly significant differences (ANOVA: p < 0.001), with both FW2 and FW3 significantly exceeding FW1 (Tukey’s HSD: p < 0.001), but there was no significant difference between FW2 and FW3 (Tukey’s HSD: p = 0.959), suggesting that management focuses on both types.

The observed Δ hue,true between the benthic and littoral groups (0.153) was consistent with a highly significant difference between the groups ( P < 0.001) based on a nonparametric bootstrap procedure for which we assumed that all individuals belong to the same group (see methods).

Regensburg Friedman tests revealed highly significant decreases in both MDI (χ2(2) = 122.40–123.39, all p < 0.001) and HAMD scores (χ2(2) = 113.95–115.92, all p < 0.001) over the course of treatment across all imputations.

Time series causality IV prevalence was significantly associated with the evolution of EV/RV ( p < 0·001) and the effect of IV was highly significant at lag zero ( p < 0·001), indicating a non-lagged interference between IV and EV/RV as assessed by the Granger causality test.

Highly significant inverse correlations were observed between L1-4 spine BMD values and age, serum OC, ucOC, and ALP values (r=-0.425, P <0.001; r=-0.431, P <0.001; r=-0.349, P =0.001; and r=-0.393, P <0.001, respectively).

Results: After performed HFDS combined with cataract surgery, the IOP was reduced from 27.7 ± 2.11 mmHg to 14.4 ± 2.59 mmHg, which is highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The difference in excess observed similarity between the groups is highly significant (p<0.001, rank test), which suggests that amino acid identity is a poor measure for estimating physicochemical similarity, and thus T cell cross-reactivity.

For all cases, significance level was established at α = 0.05, and defining 0.01 ≤ p < 0.05 as statistically significant (*), 0.001 ≤ p < 0.01 as highly significant (**), and p < 0.001 as whole level significance (***). 3.

In contrast, the decrease in bacterial numbers seen after disinfection using the standardised protocol was highly significant (right hand p<0.001, left hand p<0.001).

The analysis yielded highly significant positive associations for the following variables (listing according to strength of association): previous ablation therapy ( p -value < 0.001; OR 3.87), previous family history of CAD ( p -value 0.011, OR 2.57), previous electric cardioversion ( p -value < 0.001, OR 2.54), substitution therapy with magnesium ( p -value < 0.001, OR 2.32), administration of beta-blockers ( p -value < 0.001, OR 1.91).

All domains except Overall Q O L show highly significant differences (p < 0.001). * Sex: Male (N=281) and Female (N=219).

A highly significant correlation was observed with TPC (R 2 = 0.9312 ***, p < 0.001) and moderate correlation with TFC (R 2 = 0.8158 **, p < 0.01) ( Table 4 ). 2.4.3.

Results After the Barlett-test was highly significant (p < .001) and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin-test confirmed the adequacy of sampling (KMO = .855), the first PCA with orthogonal rotation was used to confirm the one factor solution of the CNS.

We detected highly significant interaction effects among the three factors ( p < 0.001), a result indicating that the plant cultivar also contributed to the overall patterns in anthracnose disease levels ( Table 1 ).

A major finding of our study was that the mean MSNS score was significantly lower among non-survivors (7.87 ± 1.70) compared with survivors (10.80 ± 1.75), with a highly significant difference (p < 0.001).

However, the dependence of AP precision on the number of preceding APs was highly significant [F (3,240) = 7, p < 0.001; n = 3 mice, Figure 1 E] and specific to the oscillation [nonoscillation case: F (3,91) = 2, p > 0.1; n = 3 mice, Figure 1 E].

Irrespective of the sepsis definition, PSP was the only marker to demonstrate a highly significant interaction between time and group (sepsis versus no sepsis) ( p < 0.001) with a 3.3–5.5-fold increase within 72 h before the event of sepsis, whereas CRP, PCT, and WBC showed only mild undulations.

But in the healthy group, the IAR was only 1.04 ± 0.04, which was a highly significant difference between groups (p < 0.001) [ 20 ].

( 2011 ) and SO1–SO6 in the following), the correlation between PSA benefit and duration of CI use remained strong and highly significant ( r = − 0.82, p < 0.001) and can be seen in Fig. 9 .

The difference between groups was statistically significant ( p = 0.028) when comparing only the groups I and N, but highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) were found when comparing all three groups.