“highly significant”

The sex difference in directional discordance also persisted and remained highly significant (χ 2 (2) = 29.784, p < 0.001): among females, lower-than-tertile 48.5%, matching 39.4%, higher-than-tertile 12.1%; among males, lower-than-tertile 27.2%, matching 37.0%, higher-than-tertile 35.9%.

Regarding fermentation monitoring (density and temperature), highly significant differences were found between both factors, cultivar and yeast (ANOVA repeated measures, p < 0.001), as well as their interaction ( p < 0.001 for density and p = 0.003 for temperature) ( Figure 1 B,C).

Planned contrast analyses revealed that the difference in performance between Consistent and Inconsistent trials was highly significant on Other trials, that is, when the task was to report what was in front of the novel entity, t (32) = 7.0, p < .001, d = 0.74; this provides evidence of egocentric interference.

The multivariate log-rank test was highly significant (χ 2 = 95.8, 3 df, p < 0.001).

Levene’s test indicated highly significant variance heterogeneity ( p < 0.001); therefore, Games-Howell post hoc pairwise comparisons were conducted.

In our study, there is a highly significant difference ( p = 0.001) in CF that decreases when a dam is used during care [ 23 ].

p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant (*), p < 0.01 as highly significant (**), p < 0.001 as very highly significant (***), p < 0.0001 as extremely significant (****), and ns as not significant.

In contrast, a statistically highly significant difference was observed between pretest and posttest scores in the intervention group ( p < 0.001).

Statistical comparisons between receptor subgroups and menopausal status, tumor grade, lymphatic invasion, lymph nodes, adjuvant chemotherapy drugs and pathological stage were highly significant (p-values < 0.001).

As expected, the difference in FA levels between formalin-employers and non-employers proved to be highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Variance components for the full mixed model Results from the full mixed model (Table 1 , Equation 1 ) showed a highly significant site effect on growth ( p < 0.001), evidencing significant plastic responses to the environmental conditions at each test site.

Comparison between the two groups revealed a highly significant greater mean difference of 3.27 ± 0.5 mm in Group A than Group B ( P < 0.001).

The independent variables (near-miss categories, near-miss subcategories, and coding) showed highly significant results at p < 0.001 (two-tailed).

The exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was appropriate as indicated by a Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy of 0.846 and a highly significant Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity ( p < 0.001), showing two common factors with a cumulative contribution rate of 59.61% extracted.

In a follow-up simple linear regression model, we confirmed a strong and highly significant negative correlation between the prevalence of fibrillar aggregates on RBC and the CSF Aβ42/40 ratio [ R = −0.64, t statistic (31) = −4.69, P < 0.001; see Fig. 5A ].

Two-way ANOVA revealed a nonsignificant main effect of treatment [ F (1, 12) = 3.273, p = 0.096, η 2 p = 0.214], a highly significant main effect of time [ F (2, 12) = 359.273, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.984], and a significant treatment × time interaction effect [ F (2, 12) = 42.545, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.876] on CYP450 activity.

The regression model was highly significant, F (11, 995) = 12.997, P < 0.001.

Although the overall log-rank test between these two groups did not reach significance ( p = 0.15), both the Tarone–Ware and Peto–Peto tests were highly significant ( p < 0.001), supporting the hypothesis that very low iPTH levels may be associated with reduced survival.

However, a significant difference was seen in the heart rate at 0 min (immediately after securing airway devices) in Group I (141.60 ± 14.61 bpm) and Group II (163.49 ± 12.65 bpm) that was highly significant (p≤0.001).

There was a highly significant difference from the baseline period during which all 34 requests were accepted (44% vs 100%, p < 0.001).

The difference in APTT prolongation between the Plasmodium-infected and healthy control was highly significant (p ≤ 0.001).

(2019) [ 20 ] had a large and highly significant effect (SMD=1.153, 95% CI: 1.048 to 1.257, Z=21.623, p<0.001), indicating a strong positive association between risk factors and CKD or HTN.

This consistency in the effects of AP and TK on leaf physiological traits could be attributed to the highly significant positive correlation between AP and TK ( p < .001).

The comparisons between Hologic Dimensions W/Ag (0.05 mm) and Siemens W/Rh (0.05 mm) ( p = 0.003), and Hologic Dimensions W/Rh (0.05 mm) and Siemens W/Rh (0.05 mm) ( p = 0.009) were of relatively lower significance compared to the other pairwise comparisons, which rendered highly significant differences ( p < 0.001).

A highly significant higher level of sCD200 was found among cases as compared to controls (P<0.001), while a significantly lower level of CD200 R expression on both lymphocytes and monocytes was detectable in cases as compared to controls (P < 0.001 in both instances) Table 1 .