“highly significant”

Two-way ANOVA showed a highly significant influence of genotypes ( F 1,47 = 160.8, P < 0.001) and of sex ( F 1,47 = 28.3, P < 0.001).

For both nationalities and both genders, scorpions were fixated upon the most frequently, followed by spiders, while grasshoppers were fixated upon the least frequently (comparisons between levels of animal factors within both nationalities and genders were all highly significant with p -value < 0.001).

The BA + GEM combination induced the strongest suppression of VEGF and HIF-1α, with changes highly significant at p < 0.001 (**), indicating a synergistic inhibitory effect on angiogenesis-related molecules ( Figure 5 ).

The study revealed a highly significant association between age group and nationality ( p < 0.001) ( Table 4 ).

Furthermore, high pT-category and positive lymph node status predicted a highly significant worse 5-year OS and DFS rate ( p < 0.001) (Table 1 ).

However, the main effect of SOA was highly significant ( F (1.98, 31.66) = 78.62; p = 0.001, ηp 2 = 0.83), showing that the interval between stimuli determined their temporal discriminability.

There were highly significant line and environment effects for all traits ( P < 0.001) and a genotype × environment interaction was significant for all traits except palmitic acid and plant height ( P < 0.01).

Results Is LG-OST Effective in Reducing Dental Fear at Post Treatment? MANOVA showed a highly significant main effect of time [ F (6,29) = 8.41, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.64].

The results show a highly significant difference for Pfk activity ( p < 0.001) between the two groups.

Correlations between MAGE-A3 and the other 4 TAAs are also highly significant, with r > 0.70 and p < 0.001.

For fat content, highly significant differences were also detected in fat content among the cultivars (p value < 0.001).

This decreasing number of cells for all B cell subsets was most likely due to the progressive reduction of circulating total lymphocyte numbers (data not shown) in combination with a reduced frequency of CD20 + cells in PBMC ( P < 0.001) ( Fig 5A ), resulting in a highly significant and progressive reduction of total CD20 + cell counts ( P < 0.001) ( Fig 5B ).

Analysis with the Fisher's Exact test (one sided) revealed that the overlap is highly significant (P < 0.001).

Follow-up analyses revealed highly significant effects of the MMN in the frontal cluster from 540 ms to 590 ms (290–340 ms lc; cluster 1, main effect “stimulus”: F (1,16) = 19.64; p<0.001; 29 dipoles; Fig 3E left) with no hemispheric dominance (“stimulus x hemisphere”: F (1,16) = 2.78; p = 0.12).

Considering the iAUC for serum leptin in the 0–4 h postprandial lap, this difference among the study groups became highly significant ( p < 0.001) ( Figure 2 B).

The correlations were highly significant in all blood parameters ( p ≥ 0.001; Figure 2 ).

Differences in CI between the two measuring methods did not reach significance, whereas the calculated CVAI showed a 0.74-fold decrease using 3D digital photography and was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

In the subgroup restricted to patients treated with ME DMT (n = 1025), the association between RoAD ≥ 4 and irreversible EDSS 6.0 remained strong and highly significant (adjusted HR 3.04, 95% CI 2.08–4.44, p < 0.001).

In a multivariate model that included all relevant univariate predictors, the odds ratio of current medical practice being in an outer vs inner metropolitan area still remained highly significant (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.17, 1.97, P = 0.001) (Additional file 1 : Table S2).

The highly significant ( p < 0.001) permeation was achieved from EM-NLCs-opt and EM-NLCs-opt-IG4 than EM-IG.

Overall, the differences were highly significant both for systolic BP ( P =0.001) and diastolic BP ( P =0.04) (Figure 3 ).

In this model, interactions between SA ethnicity and age remain highly significant (standardized β=0.42; P <0.001), supporting the presence of accelerated E/e′ increase in this ethnic group.

The difference in the proportion of females choosing the pesticide-free side between the conditioned and unconditioned females groups was highly significant for all insecticides tested (Likelihood Odds ratio: P < 0.001 in all cases, Table 2 ).

ELISA analysis revealed that both NS1Pep1 + NS1Pep2 (dengue NS1 antigen) or HBsAg exhibited no significant reactivity across serum sets (p > 0.05), whereas CoV-2 peptide-3 demonstrated highly significant reactivity (p < 0.001) ( Supplementary Fig. 4 , Supplementary Table 3b ).

There was however a highly significant difference between sites ( p < .001; Table 2 a).