“highly significant”

The Kaiser-Mayer-Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy suggested that the sample was favourable (KMO = 0.936) and the Bartlett’s test of Sphericity was highly significant (χ 2 = 6723.041, df = 561, p < 0.001).

The mixed model analysis of variance revealed highly significant effects of species and of treatment on T leaf ( Table 1 ; p < 0.001).

Liver enzymes: AST decreased from ~ 70 U/L at baseline to ~ 20 U/L at 6 months, and ALT declined from ~ 100 U/L to ~ 25 U/L, both showing highly significant improvements ( P < 0.001).

Taking the two monkeys together, saccades to the remembered location began approximately 36 ms later than those to the attended location, a difference that was highly significant (Wilcoxon rank sum test, p < 0.001).

Biological Parameters of White and Yellow Turkey Sperm Significant ( p ≤ 0.05) and highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001) differences were observed in the parameters characterising spermatozoa from white and yellow semen.

This decreasing number of cells for all B cell subsets was most likely due to the progressive reduction of circulating total lymphocyte numbers (data not shown) in combination with a reduced frequency of CD20 + cells in PBMC ( P < 0.001) ( Fig 5A ), resulting in a highly significant and progressive reduction of total CD20 + cell counts ( P < 0.001) ( Fig 5B ).

The strength of inter- and intralimb coordination estimated with the length of vector r was highly significant ( p < 0.001) in all groups and attained values of 0.95–0.98 in intact rats, while saline and Riluzole treated rats showed ranges of 0.84–0.98 and 0.79–0.97, respectively.

The highly significant ( p < 0.001) permeation was achieved from EM-NLCs-opt and EM-NLCs-opt-IG4 than EM-IG.

Mean Apo-B/A1 for mild, moderate, severe, PDR showed highly significant positive correlation with severity of retinopathy ( P < 0.001).

Highly significant differences in pH (p = 0.001) were observed in five of the products.

For statistical interpretation, P<0.05 (*) is considered significant, p<0.01 (**) is considered highly significant, and P<0.001 (***) is considered very highly significant.

The multivariate analysis produced an overall highly significant result of time (F(4, 227) = 2783.26, p < 0.001), but no significant effect of time by text type interaction.

There were highly significant negative correlations between serum Mg levels and HbA1c, fasting glucose, and insulin resistance with (r = -0.969, -0.894, -0.653) respectively, p-value < 0.001.

There was a highly significant correlation for both equivalent internal noise ( R 2 = 59%, p < 0.001) and for processing efficiency ( R 2 = 80%, p < 0.001).

The results showed highly significant effects for the covariate familiarity, F (1) = 58.84, p < .001, as well as the factor metaphoricity , F (1) = 12.188, p < .001.

The results demonstrated a highly significant relationship between higher knowledge levels and being aged between 38 and 47 years ( χ 2 = 446.211, p < 0.001).

41 Statistical analysis showed a highly significant difference between OB-MT groups and PCL+OB-MTs ( P <0.001).

Diversification along an elevation gradient Plant species richness showed a highly significant decrease with increase in elevation ( p < .001).

Permutation tests resulted a highly significant classification ( P = 0.001).

Furthermore, high pT-category and positive lymph node status predicted a highly significant worse 5-year OS and DFS rate ( p < 0.001) (Table 1 ).

The results showed that SCC grade had highly significant effect on SCS, IL-17 and IFN-γ in Holstein and on SCS, IL-17 and IL-6 in Sanhe cattle ( P < 0.001).

Two-way ANOVA showed a highly significant influence of genotypes ( F 1,47 = 160.8, P < 0.001) and of sex ( F 1,47 = 28.3, P < 0.001).

Results Real-time quantitative RT-PCR demonstrated a 49.9 ± 2.9 fold highly significant ( P < 0.001) increase in Gpr151 mRNA expression in the dorsal root ganglion 7 days after the spared nerve injury model of neuropathic pain.

Why do site-based and species-based analyses differ with these data? An explanation is that there is an ‘unobserved’ trait, namely Specific Leaf Area (SLA), that is almost uncorrelated with Spread (correlation 0.02) and that strongly interacts with Snow as both the site-based and species-based tests are highly significant using either the fourth-corner correlation or the GLM tests using Poisson log-likelihood (all p < 0.001, yielding p max < 0.001).

In 112 consecutive patients, we found a highly significant correlation of baseline creatinine with NUTRIC (r s = 0.500, R 2 = 0.167, p < 0.001) and mNUTRIC (r s = 0.517, R 2 = 0.175, p < 0.001) on admission to ICU.