“highly significant”

The differences between agreeing and disagreeing participants were highly significant ( p < 0.001) in both years.

sgRNA and viral isolation results were concordant in 99/105 cases (94%), indicating highly significant agreement between the two techniques (Cohen’s kappa coefficient 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78 to 0.97, P < 0.001). sgRNA RT-PCR showed a sensitivity of 97% and a positive predictive value of 94% to detect replication-competent virus, further supporting sgRNA as a surrogate marker of SARS-

Experiment 3 Within the doubled haploid population, when using the “target” growth stages for transfer as a fixed effect there was a very highly significant interaction ( P < 0.001) between temperature, growth stage, and DH line for grain number.

Again, the overall model was highly significant ( p < .001), explained 90% of total deviance (12% higher than a model containing only geographic distance) and had very high mean cross‐validation predictive accuracy ( r 2 = .90; Figures S18 and S19 ).

Nuclear size, nuclear texture, and nuclear density parameters were highly significant in differentiating between benign and malignant cases ( P < 0.001 for all of them).

Highly significant input variables ( p < .001) for estimating fine root biomass were mean annual precipitation, sampling depth and the dummy variables for dominant tree species type and species mixing.

2 B, the villus height (VH) of the duodenum in the Dis group was lower than that in the Con group, with a significant decrease at 3 dpi ( P < 0.05) and a highly significant decrease at 11 dpi ( P < 0.001).

In particular, the multiscale entropy of the surrogate time-series data showed highly significant ( P < 0.001) deviations from the original time-series.

The overall treatment effect was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

Results Analysis of variance and correlation among physiological traits Highly significant differences ( P < 0.001) in SES scores, shoot and root dry weights, shoot and root lengths, shoot and root K + and Na + concentrations, and shoot and root Na + :K + ratios were observed among families and parental lines.

ANOVA showed very highly significant difference ( P < 0.001) in AL in AcCG, when compared to PACS and controls.

The differences among severity categories and the outcome group are highly significant ( p -values < 0.001).

The most pronounced enhancement was observed in the Barberry honey (95.13%) and Barberry honey + AgNPs (89.45%) groups, both of which exhibited highly significant wound closure rates ( p < 0.001).

In this analysis, 19.5% of the total variation was observed among the geographical regions, which is a highly significant differentiation (F CT = 0.20, P < 0.001).

In contrast, a highly significant number of participants (18/20) favored complex strokes for their whole system gestures (two-tailed exact binomial test, p < 0.001).

The differences exhibited between the populations were found to be highly significant ( P = 0.001) ( Table 3 ).

Paired-samples t -tests showed highly significant mean differences ( p < .001) between the pairs belief t1 and t2, (future) behaviour t1 and t2 and feeling t1and t2 for all myths (Table 3 ).

This effect is not significant for “light smokers” relative to “never smokers”, while it became highly significant for “heavy smokers” relative to “never smokers” (OR = 4.638, p < 0.001).

H1N1 given 48 h prior to SARS-CoV-2 almost completely abrogated SARS-CoV-2-typical weight loss in both sexes, beginning at 2 dpi, and increasing to highly significant protection ( p < 0.001) from 5 dpi onwards.

However, when the Candida were quantified, we could not detect any significant difference in cell numbers within the treatment group pre- and post-denture cleansing, despite highly significant differences between the treatment arm and control group from days 3–7 (p < 0.001).

The error in the up‐sampled populations (AFQUP and WBUP) is decreased compared to the initial sets (AFQ and WB) for each subject, and comparison at the group level shows a highly significant decrease in the mean NRMSE between AFQ and AFQUP and between WB and WBUP (paired samples, p < .001).

The difference versus patients at CKD stage 1 progressively increased and became highly significant in patients with lower GFR ( P < 0.001 at stage 3a, P < 0.0001 at stages 3b, 4, and 5).

They also reported significantly lower self-efficacy (29.11 ± 4.32) and perceived lower advising support (24.75 ± 9.91), with all differences being highly significant ( p < 0.001).

There was a highly significant association between high serum copper level and active RA disease (p < 0.001).

In contrast, Tg4510 mice treated with ACI‐16664 showed a highly significant ( p < 0.001) 51% reduction in aggregated hTau levels compared to vehicle‐treated controls.