“highly significant”

A highly significant cell layer effect (p < 0.001) showed that the ganglion cell layer was significantly more affected than outer and inner nuclear layers in both BP groups.

Two-way ANOVA test of these data show that both the effects of the Ala+TIMP-2 treatment and the IBMX are highly significant ( p <0.001) when compared with the control and DETA/NO alone groups.

Interestingly, from an ecological perspective, there was a highly significant correlation (R 2 = 0.426, P < 0.001, which increased to R 2 = 0.694, P < 0.000001 if one possible outlier was removed from the analysis) between the δ 13 C value and the δ 15 N of the wild Sodo and Dilla flies' legs which may be attributable to the nitrogen status of the C4 and C3 primary producing plants, or which could be linked to the rainfall status leading to variation in the plant nutrient cycling in the two sites.

Using the ANOVA test, the difference was statistically highly significant with p < 0.001 (Table 2 ).

ToM and NP variable As shown in Table 1 , the findings in this study indicated that PtTBI performed poorly than in the HC group on the entire ToM tasks, that is, both verbal and nonverbal task and cognitive and affective task, as the mean difference between groups was highly significant ( P < .001).

After adjustment, the difference across morbidity groups was highly significant (contrast P < 0.001), with odds ratios of 0.81 (95% CI = 0.77, 0.85, P < 0.001) for the multimorbidity group and 0.94 (95% CI = 0.90, 0.98, P = 0.006) for the single morbidity groups, relative to patients without a medical condition.

When TNF-α level was estimated within and between the groups, they showed a highly significant difference of P < 0.001 [ Table 3 ].

(2020), self-rated health scores showed a highly significant improvement of approximately 33% post-bereavement ( p < 0.001) [ 25 ].

Periodontal status The difference in proportion between the CPITN scores of periodontal disease of pregnant and nonpregnant group was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

Decrease in the PCOS group was highly significant ( P < 0.001, ANOVA), while no decrease was observed in the PCOS + KHFAC group, indicating that the KHFAC modulation reversed the EV-induced suppression of estrous cycling.

Patterns in genetic diversity Global population differentiation was highly significant using all SNPs (global F ST = 0.0068, 95% CI [0.005, 0.0105]; global genic differentiation test, p < 0.001), although clustering analyses with ADMIXTURE provided the strongest support for the model with a single underlying population (Fig C in S1 File ).

Among all mental health problems, age, gender and occupational status of participants were observed to have statistically highly significant differences, with p <0.001, as illustrated in Table 2 .

Results A highly significant negative correlation was found between the perceived spousal support of women during the early postpartum period and postpartum blues [ r =-.737; p < .001].

3B ), a highly significant overlap in the distribution of suitability areas with those of L. candidulus were reported ( r = 0.823, P < 0.001) ( Table 1 , Fig. 3F ).

Additive and dominance effects for individual SNPs were highly significant ( P < 0.001) and nearly identical across the linkage group 2C haploblock within each population (File S3).

In all three phenotypic classes and for both DE and GE assays, genotype, temperature, and their interaction all had highly significant ( P <0.001; Table 1 ) effects on cold tolerance.

Results were interpreted as highly significant*** (p<0.001), significant** (p<0.01), weakly significant* (p<0.05) or not significant ns (p>0.05).

One-way ANOVA showed that this difference was highly significant statistically ( F: value 5.653, P < 0.001) ( Table 2 ).

However, the robustness of our primary conclusions is supported by the following: (1) the improvements in all primary patient-reported outcome measures (Lysholm, IKDC, KOOS, Tegner) and key radiographic alignment parameters (HKA, MPTA) were highly significant (all P < 0.001); (2) even under the most conservative Bonferroni correction for the 9 primary comparisons in Table 2 (adjusted α = 0.05/9 ≈ 0.0056), these improvements remain statistically significant.

All the drivers were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The parsimonious model remained highly significant, F (6, 5230) = 477.30, p < 0.001, explaining 35.4% of variance ( R 2 = 0.354, Adjusted R 2 = 0.353).

The observed distinctions were highly significant, with a P-value < 0.001, except for CAT, which reached statistical significance at P < 0.05.

There is a highly significant association between HRQoL and pain levels (Spearman correlation=−0.552, P <.001; Figure S5 in Multimedia Appendix 1 ), which indicates that pain is associated with decreased QoL.

The wound contracting potential of animals treated with an ointment containing 0.5 percent (w/w) ethanolic extract on day 16 (94.33 ± 0.43) was found to be highly significant ( p < 0.001 ) compared to the control group.

For the PUT, a highly significant and robust GLM model emerged (adjusted R 2 = 0.623, F(12,167) = 25.62, p < 0.001), explaining over 60 % of the variance in susceptibility.