“highly significant”

The F-statistics on all three groups was found to be highly significant (P<0.001).

Results: WOSI, Subjective Shoulder Value, and Rowe score showed a highly significant improvement at all time points of follow-up ( P < .001).

Differences were considered significant when * P < 0.05, very significant when ** P < 0.01 and highly significant when *** P < 0.001.

According to DOT per 1 000 patient-days, there was a highly significant decrease in consumption of ceftriaxone and levofloxacin, by 19.1% (p < 0.001) and 49.9% (p < 0.001), respectively ( Table 2 ).

Notably, compared with the DSS group, the LF + DSS group showed a significant reduction in pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and TNF-α ( p < 0.01), and a highly significant reduction in IFN-γ and IL-6 ( p < 0.001).

This pattern in variation of Serine and Alanine counts between species was highly significant (Chi-square = 16.956, d.f. = 3, P ≤ 0.001) suggesting that there exists a linkage between the frequency variation of the two aa.

Results: Patients showed highly significant higher serum YKL-40 level more than that of the healthy subjects ( P < 0.001).

Respondents under 35 years of age were more inclined to favor active euthanasia (83.8%; n = 2421) compared to those aged 35–45 years (65.1%; n = 938), 46–55 years (50.5%; n = 471), and over 55 years (51.0%; n = 270), with a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001).

At 270 d, both N and P additions had a highly significant impact on the sprouts’ soluble SS/ST ( p < 0.001).

Finally, a third ( Table 8 ) and highly significant model (F(5, 296) = 1604.38, p < 0.001) investigated the relationships between the five subscales of the HPLP II and its total score, explaining 96.4% of the variance.

This highly significant difference ( p = 0.001) suggests an intrinsic link between excess weight—potentially mediated by visceral inflammation or obesity-associated dysbiosis—and the generation of functional digestive symptoms [ 50 , 51 , 52 ].

We found that all differences in Tajima’s D among populations were highly significant ( P < 0.001).

For fluidity, both fiber length and fiber content show highly significant effects ( p < 0.001).

Clinic Type: A highly significant correlation ( p < 0.001) was observed between the number of equipment and the type of clinic.

With respect to its role in differentiating between necrotic and viable tumor regions, a feature was deemed highly significant if P < 0.001, significant if 0.001 ≤ P < 0.05, and not significant if P ≥ 0.05.

To evaluate the discriminatory ability of the estimated GA in identifying pre term births, ROC analysis performed indicated a highly significant ability, with area under curve of 0.86 (conservative bootstrap 95% CI = 0.83 to 0.89); P < 0.001) and a Youden Index of 0.58 (95% CI = 0.51 to 0.64) with a corresponding sensitivity of 80.7% and specificity of 77.6% ( Figure 2 , Panels A and B).

Overall, F ST was 0.086 and highly significant ( p < .001), while pairwise values varied from 0 to 0.20.

For measurements taken at the top of the samples, a highly significant effect of material type on the degree of conversion was observed ( p -value < 0.001).

For soil pH, the main effects of both PE-MPs and TSB were highly significant ( p < 0.001), while their interaction was not significant ( p = 0.213).

The P treatment had highly significant effects on all traits ( p < 0.001; Table 1 ).

Platelet accumulation ( Figure 8 A) was highly significant for PVA samples ( R 2 = 0.341, p < 0.001, and F = 56.370) and collagen-coated ePTFE samples ( R 2 = 0.618, p < 0.001, and F = 29.175).

The analysis showed that mix proportion exerted a highly significant effect on all three mechanical properties ( p < 0.001).

For both species, weight gain and weight loss during both periods were highly significant (paired student t -tests P < 0.001).

Statistical significant ( p < 0.05), highly significant ( p < 0.01), and extremely significant ( p < 0.001) features are indicated with (∗), (∗∗), and (∗∗∗) respectively.

The interaction between the diagnosis of HTN and the benefit of trandolapril treatment was highly significant (p < 0.001) ( Gustafsson et al 1997 ).