“highly significant”

Firth logistic regression showed a highly significant effect of treatment on insect mortality ( χ 2 = ∞, P < 0.001), with treated insects experiencing substantially higher mortality than controls.

The difference in migration of larvae incubated with emodepside either with or without penitrem A was statistically highly significant with p-values of <0.001 for all emodepside concentrations tested.

The overall results indicated a good fit with a highly significant log likelihood ratio ( P <.001 for Wald 2 ; see Table 4 ).

Overall, F ST was 0.086 and highly significant ( p < .001), while pairwise values varied from 0 to 0.20.

Fewer than 2% of total CpGs probes present on the Infinium HumanMethylation450K BeadChip were located within chondrocyte chromatin state 13_EnhS (strong enhancers) yet remarkably 41.8% of de‐methylated CpGs were found in this chromatin state (Figure 5 E), a highly significant over‐representation (Chi‐square test P < .001).

Controlling for age in the model did not alter results, neuroticism and extraversion remaining highly significant (p < .001) predictors.

This relationship between the magnitude of initial resuscitation and the rate of O 2 D decrease was highly significant ( P < 0.001) and predicted later evidence of cell death and organ failure in 7-day postshock survivors [ 37 ].

A highly significant positive association of Mtb detection with stool PCR was obtained in both manifestations of TB ( p < 0.001).

The relationship between TAGB and the predictor variable was also found highly significant at (p ≤ 0.001).

The difference in ADC between carcinoma in situ and benign tumor before and after comparison was significant (P=0.009, P=0.03), whereas the difference in ADC between benign tumor and invasive carcinoma was highly significant (P<0.001).

Secondary significant parameters ( p < 0.05), including catalyst loading (B) and pH (D), and the second-order effects of reaction time (C 2 ) exhibited a measurable impact on the response, although less pronounced than the highly significant variables ( p < 0.001).

Moreover, family history of CHD and C-reactive protein level between controls with stable and unstable angina patients were highly significant ( P < 0.001).

The overall trend over the five years period (2011 to 2015) showed a highly significant decrease in the ZI ( β = − 0.286, P < 0.001), while no significant trend was observed in the ZNI ( β = − 0.087, P = 0.219) (Fig. 2 ).

The S5 classifier showed a highly significant increase proportional to the severity of lesions (Cuzick test for trend, p < 0.001).

As shown in Figure 1 , all HTLV-1–infected individuals (ACs, HAM/TSP, and ATLL) exhibited strong reactivity to 44 epitopes, whereas healthy controls (HCs) displayed only low-intensity binding restricted to 9 epitopes, resulting in a highly significant difference (p < 0.001) for all HTLV-1–infected groups compared with HCs.

All other thresholds produced significant decreases in the prediction correlation, with thresholds above 2 dB and below −10 dB producing highly significant decreases (bootstrap p < 0.001).

However, the statistical analysis revealed a highly significant effect of experimental conditions on T s parameters ( P < 0.001 for T sf , T se , and T sb ), with birds that were exposed to HS having higher T s values ( Fig. 6 ).

The correlation between the repeated alcohol measures is 0.24, although it is highly significant (p<0.001).

The Kruskal‐Wallis test revealed a highly significant difference in completeness scores among the various reporter types (H = 569.68; p < 0.001).

Indeed, even for the Lateral targets, a situation that needs a priori reduced APA because of the advantages of the gravity effects on the frontal plane during the SP (Patla et al., 1993 ; Lepers and Brenière, 1995 ; Lyon and Day, 1997 ; Sparto et al., 2014 ), this difference is highly significant ( p < 0.001).

A repeated measures ANOVA with independent variables Gender Intervals and dependent variable click-release time revealed that there were very highly significant differences between different Gender Intervals, F (2.49, 131.84) = 1681.58, p < .001, partial eta-squared = .97, Greenhouse–Geisser corrected.

In contrast, the multivariate OS model showed a marked reduction of heterogeneity after inclusion of covariates (τ2 decreasing from 0.933 to approximately 0), and the overall regression was highly significant (QM = 75.67; P < 0.001).

The combing examinations found highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) in the levels of infestation for the two larger urban schools (B and H) compared with pre-COVID levels, shown in Table 1 , but a non-significant reduction in city School G, which also had a considerably diminished school roll compared with previous visits.

Despite the latter still being a highly significant correlation, it is considerably smaller than the mean overlap of the original, Δ r = .173, z = 14.07, p < .001.

Both differences were highly significant (attitudinal differential F 1,252 =41.151, P <.001; trust differential F 1,252 =134.656, P <.001).