“highly significant”

Results demonstrated a highly significant main effect of time ( F = 278.003, P < 0.001), indicating that herniation volume significantly decreased at all postoperative time points compared to preoperative levels across all patients.

When comparing between the ADRC and ADNI cohorts using non‐PVC data there were highly significant associations for both age (Fig. 2A: r = 0.83, p<0.001) and sex (Fig. 2C: r = 0.95, p<0.001).

Histomorphometry revealed a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) between cattle egrets and ducks in the thickness and area % of connective tissues of pectoral and supracoracoideus muscle bundles (Table 3 ).

In particular, earlier graph-based and CNN-based approaches demonstrate highly significant differences ( p < 0.001), emphasizing the superiority of the proposed method.

When four additives with RNA and four without RNA content are combined together into two groups, differences between means of percentage of sa WT phenotype is highly significant (Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA, P <0.001).

Self-reported exposure and perceived air quality were highly significant for all outcomes ( p < 0.001).

Patients’ total NMSS and most of its domains showed highly significant worse NMSs compared to controls (p < 0.001).

The difference in the proportion of agreement between pedodontists and nonpedodontists was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Apart from the QSAR‐based SSD σ based on NOECs, all formulae were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Apart from alcoholism, highly significant associations were also found in the subgroups of patients with AST > 37 U/L (OR 1.038, 95% C.I. 1.015–1.063, P = 0.001) and bilirubin > 0.8 mg/dL (OR 1.042, 95% C.I. 1.017–1.068, P = 0.001, Fig. 2 ).

A one-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant difference among the three groups’ mean scores for overall attitudes (ANOVA p = 0.001).

Concurrently, a strong, highly significant positive correlation was identified between local AR tissue density and intracellular lead accumulation (rs = 0.415, p = 0.001), supporting the interplay between heavy metal deposition and receptor presentation.

The cluster effect was highly significant, according to PERMANOVA analysis ( p value < 0.001) (cluster_analysis.xlsx), and explained 72% percent of sample variation.

For all bone parameters, the effect of strain was highly significant ( p < 0.001), indicating that the parameters differ significantly across the different strains.

We also found a highly significant effect of stimulus type on mean accuracy by comparing the reduced model with a random-intercept only model (χ 2 (1) = 23.34, P < 0.001; ΔAIC = 21.34), with shape stimuli decreasing accuracy by 0.146 ± 0.025 (standard error) compared to color stimuli.

The RET + KET group showed highly significant reductions in general alcohol consumption (beer, wine or spirits) from baseline to post manipulation [ F (1,89.17) = 19.55, p < 0.001, n p 2 = 0.14], equivalent to a reduction of 23.5 UK units/188 g ethanol over a week.

A one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc analysis of the weighted F ST estimates (50 kb sliding windows) showed that the differentiation between South America and the hypothesized population sources (Iberian Peninsula, broiler, egg-layer, gamefowl) is highly significant ( P < 0.001).

Regression Analysis In the regression analysis, use of methylprednisolone as a pre-infusion prophylaxis and terminal sUA were both highly significant predictors of therapy duration ( p < 0.001, Supplementary Table 1, see electronic Supplementary Material [ESM]), as measured by the number of bi-weekly infusions.

After a 4-week treatment period, a highly significant reduction in depression status was prominent in the probiotics group [ p < 0.001] and a significant increase in the placebo group was observed [ p < 0.01].

Treatment had a highly significant effect on FTD (F 3,185 = 53.96, p < 0.001), and a significant block effect was also detected (F 3,185 = 10.48, p < 0.001), indicating variability among blocks.

We found a highly significant, positive interaction (p < 0.001) effect between MAPK-pathway altered diffuse low-grade gliomas relative and clusters 1 and 2 (Fig. 3F , Supplementary Fig. 4 ), indicating over-representation of tumors with a higher expression of immune infiltrate-related genes with this tumor entity.

The contribution of year, genotype and their interaction to the date of budbreak were all highly significant ( p -value< 0.001).

Considering all three conditions (Old, Novel, Scrambled) and only including RTs on correct trials, there was a highly significant main effect of distractor type ( F 2,78 = 28.1, p < 0.001).

The difference was highly significant ( P < 0.001), indicating that it is a true and reproducible discrepancy.

As you might have anticipated, the relationships are highly significant (weighted r>0.85, P<0.001).