“highly significant”

The correlation was negative and highly significant in both data sets (classic task: r = -0.1159, p < 0.001; interruptus task: r = -0.1156, p < 0.001), thus arguing against this possible interpretation.

When examining costs, switch targets showed marginally significant restart costs [ t (21) = 1.99, p = 0.059, Cohen's d = 0.20], while repeat targets showed highly significant restart costs [ t (21) = 5.60, p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 0.43].

A172 cells exhibited a similar dose‐dependent reduction in viability, with significant effects observed at 100 nM ( p < 0.05) and 200 nM ( p < 0.01), and highly significant reductions at higher concentrations ( p < 0.001).

R345W‐ARPE‐EVs induced a highly significant ( p < 0.001) increase in cell migration rate.

Changes in miRNA Expression in the Liver 24 h after DMBA Treatment A total of 24 h after DMBA treatment, there was a highly significant ( p < 0.001) increase in the expressions of miR-134, miR-132, miR-124-1, miR-212, and miR-155 in the liver of DMBA-treated female mice compared to the control group ( Figure 1 A).

When entered, the resulting model was highly significant ( r 2 = 0.29, F 1,39 = 16.13, p <0.001) and SIPS disorganization was a significant predictor ( β = −0.54, t = −4.02, p <0.001; see Figure 2 ), indicating that a higher score on disorganization symptoms at baseline was predictive of a poorer functional outcome.

Following PSM, the intergroup difference remained highly significant (2.50 cm vs. 5.82 cm, p < 0.001).

The C 4 grasses measured here also showed a highly significant variation in stomatal traits such as SR and SD ada ( P < 0.001; Tables 1 , S2 ).

Across all years, the Kruskal-Wallis test yielded highly significant results (p < 0.001), indicating significant differences in dengue incidence among the three categories.

The relationship between ECO 2 levels and the immediate preceding end-inflation lung gas volume was highly significant (p<0.001; Fig. 5 ).

T1DM DN+ showed a highly significant reduction in bone stiffness ( p < 0.001) and bone strength ( p < 0.001) compared to nondiabetic controls.

The differences between the values from the 3T3BXB-ER cells as well as the differences between 3T3 and 3T3BXB-ER cells were highly significant (p≤0.001), resulting in a decreased nuclear volume by ∼40% in estrogen treated BXB-ER cells.

The pairwise comparison for “coronal”/“middle” showed no significance (p = 0.465), whereas that for “coronal”/“apical” and “middle”/“apical” showed highly significant differences (p < 0.001).

There was highly significant ( P < 0.001) statistical relationship between primary site of tumor and histopathologic subtype.

There was a highly significant difference found between study and control groups ( P < 0.001) for taking soy food products in a week.

The calculated paired’ test value of t = 12.644 was found to be statistically highly significant at P < 0.001 level.

A highly significant correlation between the amount of human gDNA template with the total number of RPP30 copies was observed in intra-laboratory (R 2 = 0.996, p < 0.001), inter-laboratory (R 2 = 0.997, p < 0.001) and inter-operational (R 2 = 0.994, p < 0.001) RPP30 ddPCR assays (Supplementary Figure S5A to C ).

F) is highly significant (p<0.001), indicating that it is a dominant confounding factor that prevents the factor Susceptibility from reaching statistical significance independently.

Among these, food biomass exerted a highly significant positive effect ( β = 0.85 ± 0.14, 95% CI: 0.58 to 1.11, p < 0.001), while distance to roads had a significant negative effect ( β = −0.47 ± 0.07, 95% CI: −0.69 to −0.26, p < 0.001). 4.

First, analyzing the effects of history and environment at fixed immigration levels revealed that historical source, environmental medium, and their interaction all had highly significant effects on community composition variation across all three immigration treatments (control, higher, highest) and at both time points ( p = 0.001, Table 1 ).

In terms of changes before and after each session, GLMM results indicated a highly significant post-session main effect on all VAS measures, including perceived stress (β = −18.34, p < 0.001), energy (β = 7.01, p < 0.001), tension (β = −21.78, p < 0.001), and valence (β = 14.13, p < 0.001).

Statistical comparisons revealed highly significant differences between AE patients and controls ( p < .001 for most subgroups), whereas differences between AE subgroups were not significant, suggesting a uniform elevation of this chemokine across AE phenotypes ( Figure 1 ).

We found that, with the increase in visual working memory cognitive load, accuracy and reaction times in the single visual 3-back task and dual visual 3-back + auditory Go/NoGo task showed highly significant differences (accuracy: t (86) = 3.750, p < 0.001, r pb 2 = 0.141; reaction time: t (86) = −2.675, p < 0.001, r pb 2 = 0.077) (see Figure 4 a,b).

In Figure 1 , the fit of the model was highly significant ( R 2 = 0.9541, p < 0.001).

The overall association was highly significant ( p < 0.001).