“highly significant”

Settings for both observers revealed a highly significant main effect of the adapt condition on the image appearance (S1 F(2,45)=29.5, p<.001; S2 F(2,45)=58.3, p<.001).

While, the levels of sorbitol were decreased with curcumin, the reduction was highly significant (p<0.001) with nanocurcumin ( Table 2 ).

Results Analysis of the heart-rate data showed a highly significant effect of cue (ANCOVA: F 3, 75 = 14.989, P<0.001; Fig. 1 ).

Goodness of fit of the data were very good and all the structural coefficients were highly significant ( P <0.001).

Planned comparisons that assessed the effects of congruity at each SOA separately showed a highly significant facilitation at SOA = −300 ms, t (2155) = 3.21, p = 0.001, but not at SOA = −150 and 0 ms, t s < 1, p s ≥ 0.42.

Within each age group, the risks observed overall were seen, with the HR for progression in group 1b (R1 in both eyes) being highly significant in all groups (p < 0.001) and because of the smaller numbers significant for group 1a (R1 in 1 eye) p < 0.01 in all age groups.

Intention-to-treat analysis showed highly significant improvements ( P < 0.001) with large effect sizes (>0.8) with both interventions, but there were no significant differences between groups in primary outcomes.

In fact, Figure 4A shows that there is a highly significant negative correlation (r = −0.896; p<0.001) between the ranked (from the smallest to the highest) normalized differences in F ST values between the sympatric and allopatric pairs at each loci and the respective rank of F ST values in the sympatric pair at the same loci (see figure legend for more details).

Overall, there were highly significant differences between the viruses in fitness (ANOVA: F 2,12 = 432.381, P < 0.001).

As shown in the leftmost column of Figure 7 A, integrating bin 1–10 together yields highly significant P < 0.001 and q = 6.67E-04 (length = 15–30).

As expected, there was a highly significant main effect of sampling time (F = 26.62, df = (1,54), p < 0.001), indicating that cortisol means varied across the day.

Results: Paired t -test on pre and post domperidone treatment clinical scores showed that the decline in post-treatment scores was highly significant, with P value < 0.001.

Result: Combination of both Swetashankhapushpi and Clinical Yoga Techniques showed highly significant relief ( P <0.001) than single therapy, providing overall improvement in Generalized Anxiety Disorder.

Result: Highly significant relief p < 0.001in symptoms Klama, Daurbalya and significant relief P < 0.05 in reducing urine sugar and PPBSL (postprandial blood sugar level).

Result: At 90 days, Study Group shows >5% weight reduction in 45%, 35% in 45%, 0.334/week or 1.34/month, Highly Significant weight reduction, p <0.001, Improvement in BMI, p <0.001; W/H Ratio, p <0.001; Skin-fold Triceps, Subscapular, Suprailiac, p <0.001, (Biceps p <0.05), Qualitative features viz.

In Group B, out of 15 patients, 12 patients had attained normal skin color, which was statistically highly significant at the level of p <0.001, 1 patient had mild improvement, 2 patients have moderate improvement.

Result : It was observed that after 60 days of treatment with Gomutrashodhit Langlimool in Group A there was reduction in Hair fall which is statistically highly significant ( P <0.001) and highly significant improvement was observed in reducing dandruff.( p <0.001).

Relationships among leaf traits, root traits and RGR As expected, SRA and SRL showed highly significant negative correlations to root diameter across the sample ( p < 0.001, r = −0.52 and −0.70, respectively; Table 5 ).

Even with this pattern, the smaller degree of change in the second period was still very large (ES range 1.17–1.99) and highly significant ( P < .001) across the 5 measures in both groups.

There were highly significant positive correlation between hs-CRP and IL-6 ( r = 0.702, P < 0.001) and between hs-CRP and TNF- α ( r = 0.621, P <0.001), also between IL-6 and TNF- α ( r = 0.543, P < 0.001).

Correlations were all highly significant ( p < .001).

However, there was a highly significant interaction ( P <0.001) such that the presence of both proximal and distal disease was not associated with higher risk than the presence of either disease separately (HR, 1.4 proximal only; HR, 1.9 distal only; HR, 2.2 proximal and distal).

Using these methods, 1015 cases of highly significant space- time clustering were identified (P< 0.001).

The differences in bacterial composition were highly significant (F 8,18 = 6.94, P < 0.001, R 2 = 0.755) among groups.

A log-linear regression indicated a highly significant relationship ( r 2 = 0.39, p < 0.001; Figure 3A ) between the bark flammability φ and the bark thickness squared that expresses the bark insulating ability.